SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish) / 2015 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Transkranial Doğru Akım Stimülasyonu: İnmeli Hastalarda Plejik Üst Ekstremite Motor Fonksiyon Üzerine Etkileri

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: The Effects on Plegic Upper Extremity Motor Function of Patients With Stroke

Nigar DURSUN
Erbil DURSUN
Ilgın SADE
Ersin ŞAHİN
Y. Berna ŞIK
Pages
320–334
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The plegic upperextremity motor functions were evaluated by Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Jebsen- Taylor Test (JTT) and Kocaeli Functional Evaluation Test (KFET).Results: The anodal tDCS group showed statistically significant improvements in 10qualitative-8 quantitative parameters (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The primary aim of this prospective, randomized, sham controlled study was toevaluate the effectiveness of anodal or bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) applications on the upper extremity motor functions of patients with stroke.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Anotheraim was to compare the effectiveness of bihemispheric tDCS with anodal tDCS applications.Methods: Thirty-six patients with stroke were randomly assigned into three groups as anodaltDCS (n:12), bihemispheric tDCS (n:12), or sham tDCS (n:12).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The plegic upperextremity motor functions were evaluated by Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Jebsen- Taylor Test (JTT) and Kocaeli Functional Evaluation Test (KFET).Results: The anodal tDCS group showed statistically significant improvements in 10qualitative-8 quantitative parameters (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this prospective, randomized, sham controlled study was toevaluate the effectiveness of anodal or bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) applications on the upper extremity motor functions of patients with stroke. Anotheraim was to compare the effectiveness of bihemispheric tDCS with anodal tDCS applications.Methods: Thirty-six patients with stroke were randomly assigned into three groups as anodaltDCS (n:12), bihemispheric tDCS (n:12), or sham tDCS (n:12). All patients participated in aconventional rehabilitation program for 15 days. 31 patient completed study. The plegic upperextremity motor functions were evaluated by Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Jebsen- Taylor Test (JTT) and Kocaeli Functional Evaluation Test (KFET).Results: The anodal tDCS group showed statistically significant improvements in 10qualitative-8 quantitative parameters (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu prospektif, randomize ve kontrollü araştırmanın birincil amacı anodal tDAS veyabihemisferik tDAS'nin inmeli hastalarda üst ekstremite motor fonksiyonlarına olanetkinliğinin değerlendirilmesidir. Diğer amacı bihemisferik tDAS ile anodal tDASuygulamalarının etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır.Metod: Otuz altı inmeli hasta anodal tDAS (n:12), bihemisferik tDAS (lezyonlu hemisfereanodal tDAS ve lezyonsuz hemisfere katodal tDAS) (n:12) veya plasebo tDAS (n:12) olmaküzere randomize olarak 3 gruba ayrıldı. Her hasta 15 gün süren konvansiyonel rehabilitasyonprogramı aldı.31 hasta çalışamayı tamamladı. Hastaların plejik üst ekstremite motorfonksiyonları, Wolf Motor Fonksiyon Test (WMFT), Jebsen Taylor El Fonksiyon Tesi(JTEFT) ve Kocaeli Fonksiyonel Değerlerndirme Testi (KFDT) ile değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Anodal tDAS grubu 10 kalitatif ve 8 kantitatif parametre (tüm parametreler içinp

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, N., DURSUN, E., SADE, I., ŞAHİN, E., ŞIK, Y. B. (2022). Transkranial Doğru Akım Stimülasyonu: İnmeli Hastalarda Plejik Üst Ekstremite Motor Fonksiyon Üzerine Etkileri. Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish), Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 320–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/564930

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Blicher J U, Jakobsen J, Andersen G, Nielsen JF. Cortical excitability in chronic stroke and modulation by training: a TMS study. Neurorehabil Neural Rep air 2009; 23: 486-93
  2. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Rep eated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor f unction imp rovement in stroke p atients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25: 123-9
  3. Bolognini N, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced p lasticity. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 17: 6-8
  4. Bütef isch CM, Netz J, Wessling M, Seitz RJ, Hömberg V. Remote changes in cortical excitability af ter stroke. Brain 2003; 126: 470- 81
  5. Castel-Lacanal E, Marque P, Tardy J, de Boissezon X, Guiraud V, Chollet F, Loubinoux I, Moreau MS. Induction of cortical p lastic changes in wrist muscles by p aired associative stimulation in the recovery p hase of stroke p atients. Neurorehabil Neural Rep air 2009; 23: 366–72
  6. Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moj a L, Gatti R.Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke p atients: systematic review and meta- analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010; 46: 537-44
  7. Cruz Martínez A, Tej ada J, Díez Tej edor E. Motor hand recovery af ter stroke. Prognostic yield of early transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electromyogr Clin Neurop hysiol 1999; 39: 405-10
  8. Dursun N, Dursun E, Sade I, Cekmece C. Constraint induced movement therapy: eff icacy in a Turkish stroke p atient p op ulation and evaluation by a new outcome measurement tool. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 45; 165– 70
  9. Edwards DJ, Krebs HI, Rykman A, Zipse J, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL, Pascual-Leone A, Volp e BT. Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 f orearm area f ollowing anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009; 27:199-207
  10. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaff ected hemisp here in stroke p atients. Neurorep ort 2005; 16:1551–5
  11. Friedhelm C Hummel, Leonardo G Cohen. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to imp rove neurorehabilitation af ter stroke? Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 708–12
  12. Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool f or double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurop hysiol 2006; 117:845-50
  13. Gref kes C, Nowak DA, Wang LE, Daf otakis M, Eickhoff SB, Fink GR. Modulating cortical connec