SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish) / 2016 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of The Decompressive Surgery and Medical Therapy Alone Results in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction

Geniş Orta Serebral Arter İnfarktında Dekompresif Cerrahi ve Yalnızca Medikal Tedavi Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması

Süleyman KUTLUHAN
Nihat ŞENGEZE
Tamer KARAASLAN
Pages
296–308
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Rates of survival for patients who were under 60 years old and treated with decompressive craniectomy were significantly higher than those above 60 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Decompressive craniectomy is performed in the treatment of malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction as an alternative to medical treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this cross-sectional trial is to compare the differences in morbidity and mortality rates of malignant MCA infarctions with decompressive surgery in comparison to conservative medical therapy alone (standard antiedema treatment).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Rates of survival for patients who were under 60 years old and treated with decompressive craniectomy were significantly higher than those above 60 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Decompressive craniectomy is performed in the treatment of malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction as an alternative to medical treatment. The purpose of this cross-sectional trial is to compare the differences in morbidity and mortality rates of malignant MCA infarctions with decompressive surgery in comparison to conservative medical therapy alone (standard antiedema treatment). The cases of malignant MCA infarctions observed and enrolled in this study were located in our hospital between November 2007 and June 2011. Ages of the 42 patients in the trial varied between 40 and 80, 20 of the patients were treated with decompressive craniectomy and 22 with medical therapy. Rates of survival for patients who were under 60 years old and treated with decompressive craniectomy were significantly higher than those above 60 (p

Özet

Dekompresif kraniektomi geniş orta serebral arter infarktında medikal tedaviye alternatif bir yöntem olarak gerçekleştirilmektedir. Bu kesitsel çalışmanın amacı geniş orta serebral arter infarktında yalnızca medikal tedavi ile dekompresif cerrahinin mortalite ve morbidite farklılıklarını karşılaştırmaktır. Çalışmaya Kasım 2007 ile Haziran 2011 tarihleri arasında geniş orta serebral arter infarktı ile hastanemize başvuran hastalar dahil edilmiştir. Yaşları 40 ile 80 arasında değişen, 20'si dekompresif cerrahi ve 22'si medikal tedavi ile izlenen toplam 42 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Cerrahi tedavi yapılanlardan 60 yaş altındakilerin hayatta kalma oranı 60 yaş üstündekilere göre anlamlı oranda yüksek saptanmıştır (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KUTLUHAN, S., ŞENGEZE, N., KARAASLAN, T. (2022). Comparison of The Decompressive Surgery and Medical Therapy Alone Results in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction. Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish), Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 296–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/564866

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Arac A, Blanchard V, Lee M, et al. Assessment of outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction in patients older than 60 years of age. Neurosurg Focus. 2009
  2. 26(6):E3 2. Arnaout OM, Aoun SG, Batjer HH, et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy after malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: rationale and controversies. Neurosurg Focus. 2011
  3. 30(6):E18. 3. Bardutzky J, Schwab S. Antiedema therapy in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2007
  4. 38(11):3084-94. 4. Burkert W, Paver HD. [Decompressive trepanation in therapy refractory brain edema]. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1988
  5. 49(4):318-23. 5. Cooper PR, Rovit RL, Ransohoff J. Hemicraniectomy in the treatment of acute subdural hematoma: a re-appraisal. Surg Neurol. 1976
  6. 5(1):25-8 6. Dierssen G, Carda R, Coca JM. The influence of large decompressive craniectomy on the outcome of surgical treatment in spontaneous intracerebral haematomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1983
  7. 69(1-2):53-60. 7. Ewald C, Duenisch P, Walter J, et al. Bone flap necrosis after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Neurocrit Care. 2014
  8. 20(1):91-7. 8. Fisher CM, Ojemann RG. Bilateral decompressive craniectomy for worsening coma in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Observations in support of the procedure. Surg Neurol. 1994
  9. 41(1):65-74. 9. Frank JI, Schumm LP, Wroblewski K, et al. Hemicraniectomy and durotomy upon deterioration from infarction-related swelling trial: randomized pilot clinical trial. Stroke. 2014
  10. 45(3):781-7. 10. Gupta R, Connolly ES, Mayer S, et al. Hemicraniectomy for massive middle cerebral artery territory infarction: a systematic review. Stroke. 2004
  11. 35(2):539-43 11. Heros RC. Surgical treatment of cerebellar infarction. Stroke. 1992
  12. 23(7):937-8. 12. Hofmeijer J, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, et al. Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the Hemicraniectomy After Middle Cerebral Artery infarction with Lifethreatening Edema Trial [HAMLET]): a multicentre, open, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009
  13. 8(4):326-33. 13. Johnson RD, Maartens NF, Teddy PJ. Decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: evidence and controversies. J Clin Neurosci. 2011
  14. 18(8):1018-22. 14. Juttler E, Schwab S, Schmiedek P, et al. Decompressive Surgery for the Treatment of Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery (DESTINY): a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2007
  15. 38(9):2518-25. 15. Juttler E, Bosel J, Amiri H, et al. DESTINY II: DEc