Journals / Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish) / 2017 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Akut İnme Hastalarında Hastanede Kalış Süresini Etkileyen Etkenler

Factors Affecting Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Acute Stroke

Pages
143–152
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the acute term, realization of infection and detailed assessment of functional disability are fundamental issues.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The cost of hospitalization for stroke accounts for a large proportion of the total cost of stroke in the first 12 months.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The records of 1507 patients' who were hospitalized due to acute stroke between September 2011 and September 2013 were investigated retrospectively; 909 patients were eligible for the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the acute term, realization of infection and detailed assessment of functional disability are fundamental issues.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The cost of hospitalization for stroke accounts for a large proportion of the total cost of stroke in the first 12 months. Factors that affect hospital length of stay (LOS) among patients with acute stroke should be understood in order to develop appropriate rehabilitation targets and plan discharge times. The aim of this study was to determine factors that influenced LOS among patients with acute stroke. Methods: The records of 1507 patients' who were hospitalized due to acute stroke between September 2011 and September 2013 were investigated retrospectively; 909 patients were eligible for the study. Age, sex, stroke types (ischemic or hemorrhagic), muscle strength of upper and lower extremities, number of co-morbidities, presence of infection, physiotherapy information, history of smoking, and LOS were recorded. Results: The mean length of stay was 7 days (interquartile range: 5-13 days). Patients with hemorrhagic infarct, aphasia, infection, atrial fibrillation, and history of smoking had significantly longer LOS. LOS was also longer when patients received physiotherapy. The presence of infection and functional disability level (assessed using the modified Rankin Scale) emerged as significant predictors for LOS. Conclusions: Functional disability level and presence of infection may be used to predict the LOS in patients with stroke. In the acute term, realization of infection and detailed assessment of functional disability are fundamental issues.

Özet

Amaç: İnme sonrası 12 ay içerisinde oluşan giderlerin büyük bir çoğunluğunu, hastanede kalış giderleri oluşturmaktadır. Akut inme hastalarında uygun rehabilitasyon amaçlarının belirlenmesi ve taburculuk zamanının tasarlanması için hastanede yatış süresini etkileyen etkenlerin anlaşılması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, akut inme hastalarında hastanede yatış süresini etkileyen etkenleri belirlemektir. Yöntem: Eylül 2011-Eylül 2013 tarihleri arasında hastanede yatan 1507 akut inme hastasının kayıtları geriye yönelik incelendi. 909 hasta çalışma için uygun bulundu. Yaş, cinsiyet, inme türü (hemorajik ya da iskemik), kol ve bacak kas kuvveti, eşlik eden hastalık sayısı, enfeksiyon varlığı, fizyoterapi bilgisi, sigara öyküsü ve yatış süresi kaydedildi. Sonuçlar: Ortanca kalış süresi 7 gündü. Hemorajik enfarktı, afazisi, enfeksiyonu, atriyel fibrilasyonu ve sigara kullanımı olan hastalar, anlamlı olarak daha uzun süre kalmışlardır. Fizyoterapi alan hastaların yatış süresi daha uzundu. Enfeksiyon varlığının ve fonksiyonel dizabilite düzeyinin (Modifiye Rankin Ölçeği ile belirlenmiştir), hastanede yatış süresi için anlamlı göstergeler oldukları anlaşılmıştır. Tartışma: Akut dönemde, enfeksiyonun belirlenmesi ve fonksiyonel dizabilitenin detaylı değerlendirilmesi temel konulardır. Fonksiyonel dizabilite ve enfeksiyon varlığı ile ilgili bilgiler inme hastalarında hastanede kalış süresini öngörebilmek için kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUTLUK, K., KAHRAMAN, T., GÖZ, E., GENÇ, A., ÖZTÜRK, V., KAYA, Ö. (2022). Akut İnme Hastalarında Hastanede Kalış Süresini Etkileyen Etkenler. Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish), Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 143–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/564822

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aho K, Harmsen S, Hataon S, et al. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ 1980; 58:113-130
  2. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016; 133: e38-360
  3. Schnitzler A, Woiman F, Nicolau J, et al. Schnitzler A, Woimant F, Nicolau J, Tuppin P, de Peretti C. Effect of rehabilitation setting on dependence following stroke: an analysis of the French inpatient database. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014; 28:36-44
  4. Hossmann KA, Heiss WD. Neuropathology and pathophysiology of stroke. Brainin M, Heiss WD (Wolf-Dieter), Tabernig S, editors. Textbook of stroke medicine. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 1-32
  5. Agarwal S, Menon V, Jaber WA. Outcomes after acute ischemic stroke in the United States: Does residential ZIP code matter. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4:1-12
  6. Edmans J. Occupational Therapy and Stroke, Second Edition, Malaysia, Blackwell Publishing, 2010; 1-23
  7. Sommerfeld DK, Johanson H, Jönsson AL, et al. Rivermead Mobility Index can be used to predict length of stay for elderly persons, 5 days after stroke onset. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2011; 34:64-71
  8. Kwok CS, Clark AB, Musgrave SD, et al. The SOAR stroke score predicts hospital length of stay in acute stroke: an external validation study. Int J ClinPract 2015; 69:1-7
  9. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 1:1-72. Somerford PJ, Lee AL, Yau KK. Ischemic stroke hospital stay and discharge destination. Ann Epidemiol 2004; 14:773-777
  10. Pollack MRP, Disler PB. 2: Rehabilitation of patients after stroke. Med J Aust 2002;177:452- 456
  11. Seet RCS, Lim ECH, Chan YH, Seet RC, Lim EC, Chan YH, Chan BP, Quek AM, Ong BK. Can demographic and admission laboratory variables be useful to identify long-stay patients with acute ischemic stroke? A hospital-based cohort study in Singapore. NeurolSci 2009; 30:275-280
  12. Lim JH, Cheon SH. Analysis of variation in length of stay (LOS) after ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). J Phys TherSci 2015; 27:799-803
  13. Aksoy D, İnanir A, Ayan M, et al. Predictors of mortality and morbidity in acute ischemic stroke. Archives of Noro Psikiyatr Ars 2013;50:40-44
  14. Li Y, Liu H, Wang J, et al. Variable lengths of stay among ischemic stroke subtypes