Journals / Journal of multidisciplinary academic tourism / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Perceptions about the applicability of robot technology in the tourism industry

Pages
97–108
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the research findings, it is accepted that airports, housekeeping activities, tour operator and travel agency services and hotel receptions are the most applicable areas of robot technology in the tourism industry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the research, it is aimed to determine the applicability of robot technology and the importance of technological innovations in the tourism industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research data was collected from tourism students, academicians and managers who participated in the Mersin University Faculty of Tourism Career Days and the IVth International Eastern Mediterranean Tourism Symposium held in 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the research findings, it is accepted that airports, housekeeping activities, tour operator and travel agency services and hotel receptions are the most applicable areas of robot technology in the tourism industry.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Tourism Industry · Robot Technology · Turkey

Abstract

In the research, it is aimed to determine the applicability of robot technology and the importance of technological innovations in the tourism industry. The populatin of the research consists of academicians, managers and students in the tourism industry. In the research, the "convenience sampling" method was used, in which everyone who participated in the research could be included in the sample. The research data was collected from tourism students, academicians and managers who participated in the Mersin University Faculty of Tourism Career Days and the IVth International Eastern Mediterranean Tourism Symposium held in 2019. The Cronbach Alpha test was applied for the reliability of the scale, along with the frequency distributions, percentiles, mean values, standard deviations and correlation coefficients from the descriptive statistics of the obtained data. In the research findings, it is accepted that airports, housekeeping activities, tour operator and travel agency services and hotel receptions are the most applicable areas of robot technology in the tourism industry.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİNSÖZ, B. C., DOĞAN, S., DURAN, A. (2022). Perceptions about the applicability of robot technology in the tourism industry. Journal of multidisciplinary academic tourism, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 97–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/564766

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. İstanbul:
  2. Sakarya Kitabevi.
  3. Anandan, T. M. (2019). Human-Robot Interaction: A Team Sport. Accessed at. https://www.automate.org/industry-insights/human-robot-interaction-a-team-sport, (21.07.2021).
  4. Arai, T., Kato, R., & Fujita, M. (2010). Assessment of operator stress induced by robot collaboration in assembly. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 59, 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.043
  5. Atsız, O. (2021). Virtual reality technology and physical distancing: A review on limiting human interaction in tourism. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism, 6 (1), 27-35. DOI: 10.31822/jomat.834448 Attaran, M. (2007). Robotics Applications in Manufacturing. Journal of Information Systems Management, 7 (1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399019008968323
  6. Baykal, F. (2015). Uluslararası Turizm Ulaştırmasının Akış Yönü ve Dağılış Dokusu. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 24 (2), 57-68.
  7. Bazazo, I., Elyas, T., Awawdeh, L., Faroun, M., & Qawasmeh, S. (2017). The impact of Islamic attributes of destination loyalty via the mediating effect of tourist satisfaction. International Journal of Business Administration, 8(4), 65–78.
  8. Beusher, L. M., Fan, J., Sarkar, N., Dietrich, M. S., Newhouse, P. A., Miller, K. F., Mion, L. C. (2017). Socially assistive robots: measuring older adults' perceptions. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 43(12), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20170707-04
  9. Buhalis, D., Harwood, T., Bogicevic, V., Viglia, G., Beldona, S., & Hofacker, C. (2019). Technological disruptions in services: Lessons from tourism and hospitality. Journal of Service Management, 30(4), 484–506. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-12-2018-0398 Čaić, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Mahr, D. (2018). Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks. Journal of Service Management, 29 (2),178-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-07-2017-0179
  10. Chan, A. P. H., & Tung, V. W. S. (2019). Examining the effects of robotic service on brand experience: the moderating role of hotel segment. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36 (4), 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2019.1568953
  11. Chin, Y. H., Lee, H. P., Su, C. W., Li, J. H., Lin, C. H., & Wang, J. F. (2014). A Framework Design for Human-Robot Interaction. In: Huang Y M., Chao H C., Deng D J., Park J. (eds) Advanced Technologies, Embedded and Multimedia for Human-centric Computing. Lecture Notes in