Journals / Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

The impact of the flipped classroom on receptive and productive vocabulary learning

Ters-yüz sınıfın algısal ve üretken kelime öğrenimine etkileri

Pages
437–449
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Depending on the results, it can be stated that the flipped classroom holds promise for the language learning process in terms of vocabulary learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present study was to measure the effect of the flipped classroom on vocabulary learning in termsof both receptive and productive vocabulary.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To do this, a post-test experimental research design was implemented.The participants of the study are 58 high school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Depending on the results, it can be stated that the flipped classroom holds promise for the language learning process in terms of vocabulary learning.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to measure the effect of the flipped classroom on vocabulary learning in termsof both receptive and productive vocabulary. To do this, a post-test experimental research design was implemented.The participants of the study are 58 high school students. The experimental group was exposed to a four-weekflipped instruction in which they worked on the pre-prepared videos designed by the teacher. The practice wasdone collaboratively inside the classroom. The control group was taught the target vocabulary in the traditionalway in which the vocabulary presentation took place in the classroom and the practice was done as homework.Following the instruction of each group of words, a vocabulary quiz was administered to both groups. The resultswere analyzed by using the SPSS package program. The experimental group’s perceptions of the flipped classroomwere also evaluated through an open-ended questionnaire. Depending on the results, it can be stated that the flipped classroom holds promise for the language learning process in terms of vocabulary learning.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, hem algısal hem de üretken kelime bilgisi açısından ters-yüz sınıfın kelime öğrenimine etkilerini ölçmektir. Bunu yapmak için art sınav yöntemi uygulandı. Çalışmanın katılımcıları 58 lise öğrencisidir. Deney grubu, öğretmen tarafından hazırlanmış videolara çalışarak derse geldikleri 4 haftalık ters-yüz öğretime tabi tutuldu. Alıştırmalar grup çalışması şeklinde sınıfta yapıldı. Kontrol grubuna hedef kelimeler geleneksel yöntemle sınıfta öğretildi. Alıştırmalar ise ev ödevi olarak verildi. Her öğretim sonunda gruplara quiz uygulandı. Sonuçlar SPSS program kullanılarak analiz edildi. Deney grubunun ters-yüz sınıf algıları açık uçlu sorulardan oluşan bir anketle ölçüldü. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre ters-yüz sınıfın kelime öğrenimi açısından dil öğrenim sürecine katkısı olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRMIZI, Ö., KÖMEÇ, F. (2022). The impact of the flipped classroom on receptive and productive vocabulary learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 437–449. https://ajindex.com/articles/563983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alsowat, H. (2016). An EFL flipped classroom teaching model: Effects on English language higherorder thinking skills, student engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9) Basal, A. (2015). The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education- TOJDE, 16(4) Baz, E.H. (2016).Attitudes of Turkish EFL student teachers towards technology use. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 15(2) Bergmann, J., &Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Alexandria, VA: International Society for Technology in Education. Buyukyavuz O. &Inal S. (2008). A descriptive study on Turkish teachers of English regarding their professional needs, efforts for development and avail-able resources. The Asian EFL Journal, 10, 215-234.
  2. Chan, V. (2001a). Learning autonomously: The learners' perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3), 285-300.
  3. Chan, V. (2001b). Readiness for learner autonomy: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505-518.
  4. Chan, V., Spratt, M., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students’ attitudes and behaviours. Evaluation and Research in Education, 16(1), 1-18.
  5. Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 195-205.
  6. Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: What do learners believe about them? System, 27(4), 493-513.
  7. Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
  8. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructionaltechnology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheetcourse. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
  9. Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation a literature review. System, 23(2), 165-174.
  10. Gairns, R. & Redman, S. (1986).Working with words. Cambridge: CUP. Han, Y. J. (2015). Successfully flipping the ESL classroom for learner autonomy, NYS TESOL Journal, 2(1). Holec, H., (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon. (Firstpublished 1979, Strasbourg: Council of Europe) Hung, H.T. (2014). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96.
  11. Karabıyık, A. (2008). The relationship betwee