Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS AND THINKING STYLES OF PRE-SERVICE EFL TEACHERS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
1032–1052
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the findings ofthe study, it can be said that the participants have a moderate level of metacognition, the mostprominent thinking styles are legislative, judicial, monarchic, and anarchic thinking styles,and legislative, executive, monarchic, and internal thinking styles predict metacognition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Metacognition is an umbrella term encompassing thinking and memory, learning,motivation, and cognitive development as indicated by Metcalfe & Shimamura (1994).
📊
Key Findings & Data:According toLivingstone (2003: 2), “activities such as planning how to approach a given learning task,monitoring comprehension, and evaluating progress towards the completion of ‘that’ task ismetacognitive in nature.” As to the educational practices, learners thinking styles andmetacognitive awareness should be attached importance in the sense that both are consideredinfluential factors on learning and thinking.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the findings ofthe study, it can be said that the participants have a moderate level of metacognition, the mostprominent thinking styles are legislative, judicial, monarchic, and anarchic thinking styles,and legislative, executive, monarchic, and internal thinking styles predict metacognition.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Metacognition is an umbrella term encompassing thinking and memory, learning,motivation, and cognitive development as indicated by Metcalfe & Shimamura (1994). As isgenerally believed, metacognition has direct linkage with higher order thinking skills, which isall about regulating and functioning on cognitive processes of learning. According toLivingstone (2003: 2), “activities such as planning how to approach a given learning task,monitoring comprehension, and evaluating progress towards the completion of ‘that’ task ismetacognitive in nature.” As to the educational practices, learners thinking styles andmetacognitive awareness should be attached importance in the sense that both are consideredinfluential factors on learning and thinking. Therefore, the current study aims to scrutinize thispossible relationship that takes place in foreign language education specifically. For thispurpose, a representative group of 121 pre-service EFL teachers enrolled in English LiteratureDepartment was the participant group of this study. Thinking Styles Inventory (TSI) andMetacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) were used to collect data. The results werestatistically analyzed through the application of SPSS 22.0 version. Based on the findings ofthe study, it can be said that the participants have a moderate level of metacognition, the mostprominent thinking styles are legislative, judicial, monarchic, and anarchic thinking styles,and legislative, executive, monarchic, and internal thinking styles predict metacognition.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIÇOBAN, A., KIRMIZI, Ö. (2022). THE CORRELATION BETWEEN METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS AND THINKING STYLES OF PRE-SERVICE EFL TEACHERS. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 1032–1052. https://ajindex.com/articles/542235

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Apaydin, B.B. & Cenberci, S. (2018). Correlation Between Thinking Styles and Teaching Styles of Prospective Mathematics Teachers, World Journal of Education 8(4), 36-46.
  2. Aydin, U., & Ubuz, B. (2010). Turkish Version of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory: The Validation Study. Education and Science, 35(157), 30-45.
  3. Bernardo, A. B. I., Zhang, L. F., & Callueng, C. M. (2002). Thinking styles and academic achievement among Filipino students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(2), 149–164.
  4. Betoret, F. D. (2007). The influence of students’ and teachers’ thinking styles on student course satisfaction and on their learning process. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 219-234
  5. Cano-Garcia, F., & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413–430
  6. Celik, D. (2016). Sinif ogrencilerinin Dusunme stilleri, ogrenme stratejileri ve dusunme stilleri ile ogrenme stratejileri arasindaki ilişki, M.Sc Thesis, Pamukkale University Educational Science Institute, Denizli, Turkey Cinar, G. (2016). Ögretmen adaylarinin dusunme stilleri ile yansitici dusunme egilimleri arasindaki iliski, M.Sc Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University Educational Science Institute, Samsun, Turkey. Dincer, B. (2009). Ögretmen adaylarının düşünme stilleri profillerinin çesitli değiskenler açısından degerlendirilmesi, M.Sc. Thesis, Adnan Menderes University Social Science Institute, Aydin. Efklides, A. (2014). How Does Metacognition Contribute to the Regulation of Learning? An Integrative Approach. Psychological Topics, 23, 1-30.
  7. Fan, W. & He, Y. (2012). Academic Achievement and Intellectual Styles, In Li-fang Zhang, Robert J. Sternberg, Stephen Rayner (eds) (2012). Handbook of Intellectual Styles Preferences in Cognition, Learning, and Thinking, Springer. Fan, W., Zhang, L. F., & Watkins, D. (2010). Incremental validity of thinking styles in predicting academic achievements: An experimental study in hypermedia learning environments. Educational Psychology, 30(5), 605–623.
  8. Heidari, F. & Bahrami, Z. (2012). The Relationship between Thinking Styles and Metacognitive Awareness among Iranian EFL Learners, International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 721-733.
  9. Kallio, H., Virta, K., Kallio, M., Virta, A. Hjardemaal, F.R. & Sandven, J. (2017). The utility of the metacognitive awareness inventory for teachers among in-service teachers, Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4). 78-91.
  10. Khosravi, A. A. (2