SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry / 2015 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Alt Çene İmplant Çevresi Ölçümlerinde Farklı Dental Radyografik Yöntemlerin Hassasiyetlerinin Karşılaştırılması: In Vitro Çalışma

THE COMPARISON OF THE PRECISION OF DIFFERENT DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC METHODS IN MANDIBULAR PERI-IMPLANTARY MEASUREMENTS: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Onur GECKİLİ
Fatma ÜNALAN
Fatih AYÇİCEK
Selda Arat BİLHAN
Berkman ALBAYRAK
Pelin BOZBULUT
Hakan BİLHAN
Pages
1–9
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For both of the examiner measurements, significantly less difference from the original implant dimensions was detected in the parallel technique compared to the other techniques (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate and compare the precisions of several radiodiagnostic methods used in dentistry for the measurement of peri-implantary sites.Materials and Methods: Six dental implants were placed in a human cadaver mandible.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The measurement results at each implant were statistically analyzed.Results: The ICC values for the inter-observer reliability were 0.79 for implant diameters and 0.96 for implant lengths.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For both of the examiner measurements, significantly less difference from the original implant dimensions was detected in the parallel technique compared to the other techniques (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate and compare the precisions of several radiodiagnostic methods used in dentistry for the measurement of peri-implantary sites.Materials and Methods: Six dental implants were placed in a human cadaver mandible. Periapical radiographs obtained with the parallel as well as the bisecting angle technique, digital and conventional panoramic radiographs were used for implant and peri-implant bone measurements. The measurement results at each implant were statistically analyzed.Results: The ICC values for the inter-observer reliability were 0.79 for implant diameters and 0.96 for implant lengths. Statistical significance was not detected between the differences of the measurements of the 2 examiners from the original implant dimensions related to anatomic locations. For both of the examiner measurements, significantly less difference from the original implant dimensions was detected in the parallel technique compared to the other techniques (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı implant çevresi alanların ölçümünde kullanılan çeşitli radyodiagnostik metodların hassasiyetlerini değerlendirmek ve karşılaştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Insan kadavrasına ait alt çeneye 6 adet dental implant yerleştirildi. Implant ve implant çevresi kemik ölçümleri için hem paralel hem de açıortay tekniği ile elde edilen periapikal radyografiler, dijital ve konvansiyonel panoramik radyografiler kullanıldı. Her implantın ölçüm sonuçları istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi.Bulgular: Gözlemciler arası güvenilirlik için sınıf içi korrelasyon değerleri implant çapı için 0.79, implant uzunluğu için 0.96'dır. 2 gözlemcinin ölçümleri ve anatomik konumlara ilişkin implant ebatları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunamamıştır. Her gözlemcinin ölçümünün, paralel teknik kullanılarak yapılan ölçümlerde diğer tekniklere göre implantların gerçek ebatlarından anlamlı olarak daha az fark gösterdiği belirlenmiştir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GECKİLİ, O., ÜNALAN, F., AYÇİCEK, F., BİLHAN, S. A., ALBAYRAK, B., BOZBULUT, P., BİLHAN, H. (2022). Alt Çene İmplant Çevresi Ölçümlerinde Farklı Dental Radyografik Yöntemlerin Hassasiyetlerinin Karşılaştırılması: In Vitro Çalışma. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/563846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Chaytor DV, Zarb GA, Schmitt A, Lewis DW. The longitudinal effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study: bone level changes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991;11(2):112-125.
  2. Monsour PA, Dudhia R. Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Dent J 2008;53 (Suppl 1):11-25.
  3. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Buser D. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(1):80-89.
  4. Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70(1):32. Donatsky O. Osseointegrated dental implants with ball attachments supporting over-dentures in patients with mandibular alveolar ridge atrophy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8(2):162- 166. Boerrigter EM, van Oort RP, Raghoebar GM, Stegenga B, Schoen PJ, Boering G. A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24(3):182-190.
  5. Versteegh PA, Van Beek GJ, Slagter AP, Ottervanger JP. Clinical evaluation of man- dibular overdentures supported by multiple-bar fabrication: a follow-up study of two implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(5):595-603.
  6. Mericske-Stern R, Steinlin Schaffner T, Marti P, Geering AH. Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five- year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5(1):9-18.
  7. Spiekermann H, Jansen VK, Richter EJ. A 10-year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar- retained overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(2):231-243.
  8. Leimola-Virtanen R, Peltola J, Oksala E, Helenius H, Happonen RP. ITI titanium plasma-sprayed screw implants in the treatment of edentulous mandibles: a follow-up study of 39 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(3):373-378.
  9. Akesson L, Hakansson J, Rohlin M, Zöger B. An evaluation of image quality for the assessment of the marginal bone level in panoramic radiography. A comparison of radiographs from different dental clinics. Swed Dent J 1993;17(1-2):9-21.
  10. Batenburg RHK, Stellingsma K, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Bone height measure-ments on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84(4): 430-435.
  11. Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Geraets WG, van der Stelt PF. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27(4)