Türk Toplumunda Dental Anomalilerin Görülme Sıklığı

Tooth agenesis was the most common dental abnormality (1.77%) followed by taurodontism (1.18%), hyperdontia (0.79%), microdontia (0.54%) and root anomalies (0.44%), respectively.Conclusion: Tooth agenesis is the most common developmental dental anomaly in the studied Turkish population followed by taurodontism

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of dental anomalies in a Turkish population according to the gender and age.Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed using panoramic radiographs of 2025 patients (885 males and 1140 females) ranging in age from 9 to 35 (mean age 25.61±10.04) years attending Department of oral Radiology, university of Istanbul, Faculty of Dentistry.

📊

Key Findings & Data:The incidence of these anomalies were assessed according to the gender and age.Results: Among the 2025 subjects, a total of 96 individuals (42 males and 54 females) showed at least one of the selected dental anomalies (4.74%).

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Tooth agenesis was the most common dental abnormality (1.77%) followed by taurodontism (1.18%), hyperdontia (0.79%), microdontia (0.54%) and root anomalies (0.44%), respectively.Conclusion: Tooth agenesis is the most common developmental dental anomaly in the studied Turkish population followed by taurodontism

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2025 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of dental anomalies in a Turkish population according to the gender and age.Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed using panoramic radiographs of 2025 patients (885 males and 1140 females) ranging in age from 9 to 35 (mean age 25.61±10.04) years attending Department of oral Radiology, university of Istanbul, Faculty of Dentistry. These patients were examined to determine the presence of developmental dental anomalies involving hypodontia, hyperdontia, microdontia, taurodontism and other root anomalies. The incidence of these anomalies were assessed according to the gender and age.Results: Among the 2025 subjects, a total of 96 individuals (42 males and 54 females) showed at least one of the selected dental anomalies (4.74%). Tooth agenesis was the most common dental abnormality (1.77%) followed by taurodontism (1.18%), hyperdontia (0.79%), microdontia (0.54%) and root anomalies (0.44%), respectively.Conclusion: Tooth agenesis is the most common developmental dental anomaly in the studied Turkish population followed by taurodontism

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk toplumunda dental anomali görülme sıklığının cinsiyet ve yaşa göre araştırılmasıdır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş-Çene Radyolojisi Anabilim Dalı'na başvuran, yaşları 9-35 yaş arasında değişen (ortalama yaş: 25.61±10.04) 2025 hastanın (885 erkek ve 1140 kadın) panoramik radyografileri geriye dönük olarak araştırılmıştır. Hastalar hipodonti, hiperdonti, mikrodonti, taurodontizm ve diğer kök anomalileri gibi dental anomalilerin varlığı açısından incelenmiştir. Bu anomalilerin görülme oranları cinsiyet ve yaşa göre değerlendirilmiştir.Bulgular: 2025 hastanın toplam 96'sının (42 erkek, 54 kadın) incelenen dental anomalilerden en az birine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir (%4.74). en sık gözlenen dental anomali diş eksikliği olup (%1.77) bunu sırasıyla taurodontizm (%1.18), hiperdonti (%0.79), mikrodonti (%0.54) ve diğer kök anomalileri (%0.44) takip etmektedir.Sonuç: Diş eksikliği incelenen populasyonda en sık gözlenen gelişimsel dental anomali olup bunu taurodontizm takip etmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, İ., KÖSE, T. E., AREN, G., GÜVEN, Y., AK, G., TOLGAY, C. G., BAYAR, Ö. F., KOYUNCUOĞLU, G. (2022). Türk Toplumunda Dental Anomalilerin Görülme Sıklığı. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3, 23–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/563825

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

Kuchler EC, Risso PA, Costa Mde C, Modesto A, Vieira AR. Studies of dental anomalies in a large group of school children. Arch Oral Biol 2008;53(10):941-946.
Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(4):510-514.
Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The class ii division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000;22(5):529-535.
Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(3):328-335. al-Emran S. Prevalence of hypodontia and developmental malformation of permanent teeth in saudi arabian schoolchildren. Br J Orthod 1990;17(2):115-118.
Ooshima T, Ishida R, Mishima K, Sobue S. The prevalence of developmental anomalies of teeth and their association with tooth size in the primary and permanent dentitions of 1650 japanese children. Int J Paediatr Dent 1996;6(2):87-94.
Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Aust Dent J 1998;43(6):395-398.
Mattheeuws N, Dermaut L, Martens G. Has hypodontia increased in caucasians during the 20th century? A meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2004;26(1):99-103.
Polder BJ, Van't Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32(3):217-226.
De Oliveira Gomes C, Drummond SN, Jham BC, Abdo EN, Mesquita RA. A survey of 460 supernumerary teeth in brazilian children and adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18(2):98- 106. Rajab LD, Hamdan MA. Supernumerary teeth: Review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12(4):244-254.
Chen YH, Cheng NC, Wang YB, Yang CY. Prevalence of congenital dental anomalies in the primary dentition in taiwan. Pediatr Dent 2010;32(7):525-529.
Kapdan A, Kustarci A, Buldur B, Arslan D, Kapdan A. Dental anomalies in the primary dentition of turkish children. Eur J Dent 2012;6(2):178-183.
Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndrome turkish population: Associated pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15(4):e575-578. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an indian population. J Oral Sci 2011;53(2):231-238.
Patil S, Doni B, Kaswan S, Rahman F. Prevalenc