Journals / Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3

EVALUATION OF KERATOCYSTIC ODONTOGENIC TUMORS USING CONE BEAM

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Pages
32–37
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients with an impacted tooth were significantly younger than those without an impacted tooth (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the radiological features of keratocystic odontogenic tumors (KCOT) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 28 patients who had histopathologically-confirmed KCOT were retrospectively reviewed from the archives of the Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The mean age of patients at initial diagnosis was 34.5 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients with an impacted tooth were significantly younger than those without an impacted tooth (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the radiological features of keratocystic odontogenic tumors (KCOT) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 28 patients who had histopathologically-confirmed KCOT were retrospectively reviewed from the archives of the Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry. The location and size of KCOT, cortical expansion, cortical perforation, relation with the impacted teeth, and the impact on the mandibular canal were evaluated. Results: The mean age of patients at initial diagnosis was 34.5 years. Patients with an impacted tooth were significantly younger than those without an impacted tooth (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu retrospektif çalışmada keratokistik odontojenik tümörlerin (KKOT) konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) görüntüleri ile değerlendirilerek radyolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Histopatolojik olarak KKOT tanısı konulmuş 28 hastaya ait olan ve Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Anabilim Dalı arşivinde bulunan KIBT görüntüleri değerlendirildi. KKOT'lerin konumu, boyutları, kortikal ekspansiyonun varlığı, kortikal perforasyon, gömülü dişler ile ilişkisi, mandibular kanal üzerine etkileri incelendi.Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşı 34.5 olarak belirlendi. Gömülü dişler ile izlenilen lezyonların bulunduğu hastaların yaş ortalaması, gömülü diş saptanmayan hastalardan anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKURT, M. T., ÜÇOK, Ö., GÜMÜŞOK, M., MUSEYİBOV, F. (2022). EVALUATION OF KERATOCYSTIC ODONTOGENIC TUMORS USING CONE BEAM. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3, 32–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/563808

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Philipsen HP. Om keratocyster (kolesteatomer) i kaeberne. Tandlaegebladet 1956;60:963-980
  2. Maurette PE, Jorge J, de Moraes M. Conservative treatment protocol of odontogenic keratocyst: A preliminary study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64(3):379-383
  3. Agaram NP, Collins BM, Barnes L, Lomago D, Aldeeb D, Swalsky P, Finkelstein S, Hunt JL. Molecular analysis to demonstrate that odontogenic keratocysts are neoplastic. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128(3):313-317
  4. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. WHO classification of tumours series. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005
  5. Regezi JA, Sciubba JJ. Oral pathology: clinicopathologic correlations. 4th ed., Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2003, p. 250-254
  6. Barreto DC, Gomez RS, Bale AE, Boson WL, De Marco L. Ptch gene mutations in odontogenic keratocysts. J Dent Res 2000;79(6):1418-1422
  7. Kaneda T, Minami M, Kurabayashi T. Benign odontogenic tumors of the mandible and maxilla. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2003;13(3):495-507
  8. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72(1):75-80
  9. Kocak-Berberoglu H, Cakarer S, Brkic A, Gurkan-Koseoglu B, Altug-Aydil B, Keskin C. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for diagnosis of keratocystic odontogenic tumours; evaluation of four cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17(6):e1000- 1005
  10. Akay C, Tetik A, Zeytinoğlu M. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor: A retrospective study of 64 cases. Ege Journal of Medicine / Ege Tıp Dergisi 2015;54(2):59-64
  11. Blanchard SB. Odontogenic keratocysts: Review of the literature and report of a case. J Periodontol 1997;68(3):306-311
  12. Ba K, Li X, Wang H, Liu Y, Zheng G, Yang Z, Li M, Shimizutani K, Koseki T. Correlation between imaging features and epithelial cell proliferation in keratocystic odontogenic tumour. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39(6):368-374
  13. Zhao Y, Liu B, Cheng G, Wang SP, Wang YN. Recurrent keratocystic odontogenic tumours: Report of 19 cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41(2):96-102
  14. Madras J, Lapointe. Keratocystic odontogenic tumour: reclassification of the odontogenic keratocyst from cyst to tumour. J Can Dent Assoc 2008;74(2):165–165h
  15. Haring JI, Van Dis ML. Odontogenic keratocysts: A clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66(1):145-153
  16. Macdonald-Jankowski DS, Li TK. Keratocystic odontogenic tumour in a hon