Journals / Journal of Economy Culture and Society / 2018 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation and Comparison of Lean Manufacturing Practices in Britain and France: A Case Study of a Printing Solutions Organisation

Pages
93–150
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the investigation undertakenin this research is based on only two SMEs with different backgrounds, thisstudy would recommend how SMEs can develop and improve their Leanpractices in the working place.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The objective of this research is to investigate and analyse theimplementation of Lean philosophy in two production plants SMEs –onein Britain and one in France- both belonging to the same global Americanprinting solutions and technology services organısation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the studyis to analyse the impact of lean practices on employees and on the organisationitself as well as the critical factors for a successful implementation.Design/methodology/approach: Using a case study approach, thecollection of primary data for this dissertation consisted of semi-structuredface-to-face interviews – seven in Britain and five in France - as well asobservations in both SMEs during the visits on-site.Findings; The evaluation of Lean practices in both companies revealedsignificant similarities concerning the principal Lean practices implementedand a general agreement about the importance of Lean in the current workplace.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the investigation undertakenin this research is based on only two SMEs with different backgrounds, thisstudy would recommend how SMEs can develop and improve their Leanpractices in the working place.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this research is to investigate and analyse theimplementation of Lean philosophy in two production plants SMEs –onein Britain and one in France- both belonging to the same global Americanprinting solutions and technology services organısation. The aim of the studyis to analyse the impact of lean practices on employees and on the organisationitself as well as the critical factors for a successful implementation.Design/methodology/approach: Using a case study approach, thecollection of primary data for this dissertation consisted of semi-structuredface-to-face interviews – seven in Britain and five in France - as well asobservations in both SMEs during the visits on-site.Findings; The evaluation of Lean practices in both companies revealedsignificant similarities concerning the principal Lean practices implementedand a general agreement about the importance of Lean in the current workplace. On the other hand, the study indicated differences in terms of culturalissues and internal barriers for a successful Lean adoption.Research Limitations/Implications: The samples between both companieswere different in terms of job position distribution. This study providesrecommendations beneficial to other organisations adopting Lean.Originality/Value: The novelty of this study stems from the exploration ofworkers’ points of view in relation to Lean practices, their implementation andtheir value in the work environment. Although the investigation undertakenin this research is based on only two SMEs with different backgrounds, thisstudy would recommend how SMEs can develop and improve their Leanpractices in the working place.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRBAŞ, D., HOLLEVILLE, L., BENNETT, D. (2022). Evaluation and Comparison of Lean Manufacturing Practices in Britain and France: A Case Study of a Printing Solutions Organisation. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 93–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/562374

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Achanga, P., Shehab, E., Roy, R., & Nelder, G. (2006). Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(4), 460–471. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/17410380610662889 Ahlstrom, P. (1998). Sequences in the implementation of lean production. European Management Journal, 16(3), 327–334.
  2. Atkinson, P. (2010). ‘Lean’ is a cultural issue. Management Services, 54(2), 35–42.
  3. Bamber, L., & Dale, B. G. (2000). Lean production: A study of application in a traditional manufacturing environment. Production Planning and Control, 11(3), 291–298.
  4. Bhasin, S. (2012). An appropriate change strategy for lean success. Management Decision, 50(3), 439– 458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216223
  5. Bhasin, S. (2012). Prominent obstacles to lean. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(4), 403–425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410401211212661
  6. Bhasin, S., & Burcher, P. (2006). Lean viewed as a philosophy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(1), 56–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410380610639506
  7. Biazzo, S., & Panizzolo, R. (2000). The assessment of work organization in lean production: The relevance of the worker’s perspective. Integrated Manufacturing System, 11(1), 6–15.
  8. Bicheno, J. (2004). The new lean toolbox - towards fast, flexible flow. Buckingham, UK: PICSIE Books. Bicheno, J., & Holweg, M. (2009). The lean toolbox - the essential guide to lean transformation. Buckingham, UK: PICSIE Books. Black, J. (2007). Design rules for implementing the Toyota production system. International Journal of Production Research, 45(16), 3639–3664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540701223469
  9. Brown, K. A., & Mitchell, T. R. (1991). A comparison of JIT and batch manufacturing: The role of performance obstacles. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 906–917.
  10. Browning, T. R., & Heath, R. D. (2009). Reconceptualizing the effects of lean on production costs with evidence from the F-22 program. Journal of Operations Management, 23–44. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.03.009 Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. Coates, N., & Sloan, D. (2012). The Newcastle Business School Masters Dissertation. Harlow, UK: Pearson. Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business Research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Corbett, S. (2007). Beyond manu