Journals / Journal of critical and intensive care (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

A Five Year Experience of The Tracheostomy Procedure In a Medical Intensive Care Unit

Pages
18–24
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since several consultations were requested, the implementation of the procedure was delayed for ST compared to PDT.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Tracheostomy formation is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the intensive care unit (ICU).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to analyze tracheostomy indications, complications and survival rates, and to compare characteristics and outcomes of patients who had undergone surgical tracheostomy (ST) and percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since several consultations were requested, the implementation of the procedure was delayed for ST compared to PDT.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Tracheostomy formation is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to analyze tracheostomy indications, complications and survival rates, and to compare characteristics and outcomes of patients who had undergone surgical tracheostomy (ST) and percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT). Methods: It was a prospective nonrandomized study conducted at a university hospital ICU. It included 88 consecutive adult patients receiving elective tracheostomy between September 2015 and February 2020. Results: The main indications for tracheostomy were prolonged mechanical ventilation, airway protection and pulmonary hygiene. The patients received a tracheostomy after a median of 17 (9-25) days of endotracheal intubation. Twenty-five percent of the patients were mobilized and 27% started oral feeding after tracheostomy. The survival rates at 28 days after tracheostomy, hospital discharge and 1 year were 64.8%, 40.9% and 15.9%, respectively. The ratio of the patients with ST was 36%. There were no differences in demographic data, comorbidity, admission diagnosis, complication rate, tracheostomy indication and survival rate between ST and PDT groups. Although duration of intubation before tracheostomy were similar between the groups, the time passed from informed consent for tracheostomy to the tracheostomy procedure was longer in the ST group (PDT, 3 [1-6]; ST, 6 [2-11] days; p=0.011). All ST patients had preoperative consultations from other clinics and the mean number of consultation per patient was 2.7. Conclusion: Both ST and PDT were safe procedures in the ICU. Since several consultations were requested, the implementation of the procedure was delayed for ST compared to PDT.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBAŞ, T., TAŞÇI, E. Ş., GENÇ, E. (2022). A Five Year Experience of The Tracheostomy Procedure In a Medical Intensive Care Unit. Journal of critical and intensive care (Online), Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 18–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/562262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Heffner JE, Hess D. Tracheostomy management in the chronically ventilated patient. Clin Chest Med. 2001
  2. 55–69. [CrossRef] 2. Freeman BD. Tracheostomy update: When and how. Crit Care Clin. 2017
  3. 311–22. [CrossRef] 3. Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Chest. 1985
  4. 715–19. [CrossRef] 4. Freeman BD, Isabella K, Cobb JP, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2001
  5. 926–30. [CrossRef] 5. Friedman Y, Fildes J, Mizock B, et al. Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies. Chest. 1996
  6. 480–5. [CrossRef] 6. Klotz R, Probst P, Deininger M, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications. Langenbeck Arch Surg. 2018
  7. 137–49. [CrossRef] 7. Antonelli M, Michetti V, Di Palma A, et al. Percutaneous translaryngeal versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized trial with 1-year double-blind follow-up. Crit Care Med. 2005
  8. 1015–20. [CrossRef] 8. Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, et al. Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: The TracMan randomized trial. JAMA. 2013
  9. 2121– 9. [CrossRef] 9. Terragni PP, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, et al. Early vs late tracheotomy for prevention of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010
  10. 1483–9. [CrossRef] 10. Plummer AL, Gracey DR. Consensus conference on artificial airways in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1989
  11. 178–80. [CrossRef] 11. Park SS, Goldenberg D. Percutaneous tracheotomy: Griggs technique. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology. 2007
  12. 95–8. [CrossRef] 12. Blot F, Similowski T, Trouillet J-L, et al. Early tracheostomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation in unselected severely ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008
  13. 1779–87. [CrossRef] 13. Massick DD, Yao S, Powell DM, et al. Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Laryngoscope. 2001
  14. 494–500. [CrossRef] 14. Shen G, Yin H, Cao Y, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus fibre optic bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Ir J Med