SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations / 2011 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Yeni bir muayene tekniği ile (Hız-Ediz Test) palmaris longus kası yokluğunun Van, Türkiye yöresinde ikamet eden popülasyondaki prevelansı

Prevalence of the absence of palmaris longus muscle assessed by a new examination test (Hiz-Ediz Test) in the population residing in the area of Van, Turkey

Metin ERDEN
Elif GÜLCÜ
Levent EDİZ
Emrullah GEZİCİ
Özcan HİZ
Mehmet Fethi CEYLAN
Pages
254–259
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our results indicate that the prevalence of PLM agenesis is consistent with the available data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The primary goal of this trial was to show the compatibility between a new test technique (Hiz-Ediz test) for detection of palmaris longus muscle (PLM) agenesis, which we recently developed, and the former tests, the Schaeffer and Mishra’s second tests.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: In the Hiz-Ediz test, PLM agenesis was determined in 15.1%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our results indicate that the prevalence of PLM agenesis is consistent with the available data.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The primary goal of this trial was to show the compatibility between a new test technique (Hiz-Ediz test) for detection of palmaris longus muscle (PLM) agenesis, which we recently developed, and the former tests, the Schaeffer and Mishra’s second tests. Materials and methods: One thousand cases were enrolled in this trial. Schaeffer’s test, Mishra’s second test and Hiz-Ediz tests were applied to all cases. Examinations were performed to determine differences between genders and both hands. Consistency between all three tests was investigated. Results: In the Hiz-Ediz test, PLM agenesis was determined in 15.1%. No significant difference was found between the rates of unilateral and bilateral tendon agenesis determined by three tests (p>0.05). When the consistency of the three tests was evaluated using the kappa test, full consistency was determined between Mishra’s second and the Hiz-Ediz test; however, full consistency was not determined between the Schaffer’s and the other two tests. But, no statistical difference was found between the three tests. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the prevalence of PLM agenesis is consistent with the available data. The Hiz-Ediz test can be applied easily and safely to determine and to visualize the PLM agenesis, when compared to the Mishra’s second test and the Schaeffer’s test. J Clin Exp Invest 2011; 2 (3): 254-259.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın ana amacı Palmaris Longus Kası (PLK) agenezinin tespiti için yeni geliştirdiğimiz bir test tekniği ile (Hız-Ediz test), önceki testler arasındaki (Schaeffer ve Mishra ikinci testleri) arasındaki uyumluluğu göstermek idi. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışmaya 1000 olgu alındı. Tüm olgulara Schaeffer testi, Mishra ikinci testi ve Hız-Ediz testi uygulandı. Cinsiyetler ve her iki el arasındaki farklar tespit edilmeye çalışıldı. Her üç test arasındaki tutarlılık araştırıldı. Bulgular: Hız-Ediz testinde, PLK agenezi olguların %15.1’inde tespit edildi. Üç test tarafından tespit edilen unilateral ve bilateral tendon agenezi oranları açısından testler arasında herhangi bir fark yoktu (p>0.05). Her üç testin tutarlılığı kappa test ile değerlendirildiğinde Mishra ikinci test ve Hız-Ediz test arasında tam tutarlılık tespit edildi; bununla birlikte Schaeffer ve diğer iki test arasında tam tutarlılık tespit edilmedi. Ancak, üç test arasında istatistiksel bir fark bulunmadı. Sonuç: PLK agenezi prevelansının textbook bilgileri ile uyumlu olduğunu göstermektedir. Hız-Ediz testi, Mishra ve Schaeffer ikinci testleri ile kıyaslandığında PLK agenezisini görmede ve tespit etmede kolay ve güvenilir olarak uygulanabilir. Klin Deney Ar Derg 2011; 2 (2): 254-259.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEN, M., GÜLCÜ, E., EDİZ, L., GEZİCİ, E., HİZ, Ö., CEYLAN, M. F. (2022). Yeni bir muayene tekniği ile (Hız-Ediz Test) palmaris longus kası yokluğunun Van, Türkiye yöresinde ikamet eden popülasyondaki prevelansı. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 254–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/562048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Standring S. Gray’s anatomy, 39th edn. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Edinburg, 2005: 876-7
  2. Koo CC, Roberts AH. The palmaris longus tendon. Another variation in its anatomy. J Hand Surg Br 1997; 22(1): 138-9
  3. SchlaXy B, Lister G. Median nerve compression secondary to biWd reversed palmaris longus. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12(3): 371-3
  4. Sebastin SJ, Lim AY, Bee WH, Wong TC, Methil BV. Does the absence of the palmaris longus aVect grip and pinch strength. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30(4): 406-8
  5. Wehbe MA. Tendon graft donor sites. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17(6): 1130-2
  6. Kleinert HE, Pulvertaft RG, Smith DJ. Flexor tendon grafting in the hand. In: Jupiter JB (ed) Flynn’s hand surgery. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1991: 285
  7. Saldana MJ. Primary extensor tendon grafts in zones 5 to 7. In: Blair WE (ed) Techniques in hand surgery. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1996: 587
  8. Smith P. Injury. In: Smith P (ed) Lister’s the hand--diagnosis and indications. Churchill Livingstone, London, 2002: 11
  9. Ceyhan O, Mavt A. Distribution of agenesis of palmaris longus muscle in 12 to 18 years old age groups. Indian J Med Sci 1997: 51(5): 156-60
  10. Kose O, Adanir O, Cirpar M, Kurklu M, Komurcu M. The prevalence of absence of the palmaris longus: a study in Turkish population. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129(5): 609-11 11. Schaeffer TJ. On the variations of the palmaris longus muscle. Anat Rec 1909; 3: 275-8
  11. Zeybek A, Gurunluoglu R, Cavdar S, Bayramicli M. A clinical reminder: A palmaris longus muscle variation. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41: 224-5
  12. Mishra S. Alternative tests in demonstrating the presence of the palmaris longus. Indian J Plastic Surg 2001; 34: 12
  13. Pushpakumar SB, Hanson RP, Carroll S. The ‘two finger’ sign. Clinical examination of palmaris longus (PL) tendon. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57: 184-5
  14. Bhattacharya V, Raveendra Reddy G. The palmaris longus tendon-rationality of the finger manoeuvres. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58: 419-21
  15. Mahajan AL. The ‘fingers fan out’ sign: Stick out your palmaris longus even better! Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58: 278-9
  16. Oudit D, Crawford L, Juma A, Howcroft A. The ‘‘fourfinger’’ sign: To demonstrate the palmaris longus tendon. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 691-2
  17. Gangata H. The Clinical surface anatomy anomalies of the palmaris longus muscle in the Black African population of Zimbabwe and a proposed new testing technique. Clinical Anatomy 2009; 22(2): 230-5
  18. Ahn DS, Yoon ES, Koo SH, Park SH. A pro