SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations / 2013 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Ardışık üçüncü trimester ultrason incelemeleri ile fetal ağırlığın tahmin edilmesi

Serial third trimester ultrasound examinations in predicting fetal weight

Gökçenur GÖNENÇ
İlkkan DÜNDER
Alin Başgül YİĞİTER
Herman İŞÇİ
Nilgün GÜDÜCÜ
Pages
28–33
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Correlation coefficients of estimated fetal weights percentiles at first, second and third ultrasounds were significantly correlated with birth weight percentiles (r=0.556, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the ac-curacy of estimated fetal weights obtained by ultrasonog-raphies performed at different weeks in the third trimesterand just before delivery.Methods: A total of 664 patients underwent three serialultrasonographic examinations in the third trimester.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The estimated fetal weight percentiles were com-pared with the actual birth weight percentiles at delivery.Results: Mean maternal age was 30±4 years (18-42 years), mean gestational age at first ultrasound was 32±0.5 weeks (30.4-33.6 weeks), mean gestational age at second ultrasound was 36±0.4 weeks (35-36.9 weeks), mean gestational age at third ultrasound was 38.6±1 weeks (36.3– 42 weeks).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Correlation coefficients of estimated fetal weights percentiles at first, second and third ultrasounds were significantly correlated with birth weight percentiles (r=0.556, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the ac-curacy of estimated fetal weights obtained by ultrasonog-raphies performed at different weeks in the third trimesterand just before delivery.Methods: A total of 664 patients underwent three serialultrasonographic examinations in the third trimester. Thesonographically estimated fetal weight was calculated us-ing the Hadlock formula and then converted into percen-tiles. The estimated fetal weight percentiles were com-pared with the actual birth weight percentiles at delivery.Results: Mean maternal age was 30±4 years (18-42 years), mean gestational age at first ultrasound was 32±0.5 weeks (30.4-33.6 weeks), mean gestational age at second ultrasound was 36±0.4 weeks (35-36.9 weeks), mean gestational age at third ultrasound was 38.6±1 weeks (36.3– 42 weeks). Mean gestational age at deliv- ery was 39± 1 weeks (36-42 weeks), mean birth weight was 3422±423 grams (1900-4900 grams). Correlation coefficients of estimated fetal weights percentiles at first, second and third ultrasounds were significantly correlated with birth weight percentiles (r=0.556, p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, üçüncü trimesterin değişik haftalarında ve doğumdan hemen önce yapılan ultrasonografik ölçümlerin tahmini fetal ağırlığı tespit etmedekidoğruluğunu belirlemektir. Yöntemler: Toplam 664 hastanın üçüncü trimesterde yapılmış 3 adet ultrasonografik verisi elde edildi ve Hadlock formülü ile tahmini doğum ağırlığı ve persentili hesaplandı. Daha sonra tahmini fetal ağırlık persentilleri, doğumdaki gerçek ağırlık persentili ile karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama anne yaşı 30±4 (18-42) yıl, ilk üçüncü trimester ultrasonunun yapıldığı hafta ortalaması 32±0.5 hafta (30.4-33.6 hafta), ikinci ultrasonun yapıldığı hafta ortalaması 36±0.4 hafta (35-36.9 hafta), üçüncü ultrasonun yapıldığı hafta ortalaması 38.6±1 hafta (36.3– 42 hafta). Doğumun gerçekleştiği ortalama gebelik haftası 39±1 hafta (36-42 hafta), ortalama doğum kilosu 3422±423 gram (1900-4900 gram). Birinci, ikinci, üçüncü ultrason ölçümlerinde elde edilen persentillerin doğum ağırlığı persentili ile korelasyonu (sırasıyla, r=0.556, p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNENÇ, G., DÜNDER, İ., YİĞİTER, A. B., İŞÇİ, H., GÜDÜCÜ, N. (2022). Ardışık üçüncü trimester ultrason incelemeleri ile fetal ağırlığın tahmin edilmesi. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 28–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/561813

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Heiskanen N, Raatkainen K, Heinonen S. Fetal macrosomia- a continuing obstetric challenge. Biol Neonate 2006;90:98-103
  2. Medchill MT, Peterson CM, Kreinick C, et al. Prediction of estimated fetal weight in extremely low birth weight neonates (500-1000 g). Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:286- 290
  3. Nahum GG, Stanislaw H. Validation of a birth weight prediction equation based on maternal characteristics. J Reprod Med 2002;47:752-760
  4. Mongelli M, Benzie R. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: a comparison of weight prediction models using computer simulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:500-503
  5. Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, et al. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:72-77 6. Halaska MG, Vlk R, Feldmar P, et al. Predicting term birth weight using ultrasound and maternal character- istics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Biol 2006;128:231-235 7. Pressman EK, Bienstock JL, Blakemore KJ, et al. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in the third trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:502-506
  6. Krantz C, Hitschold T. Impact and limitations of ultra- sound examination immediately before delivery-a prospective evaluation with 1127 pregnant women. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2011;215:69-76
  7. Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:28-31
  8. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333-337
  9. Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:80-89
  10. Larsen T, Greisen G, Petersen S. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound-estimated fetal weight: a comparison between single and repeated estimates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;60:37-40
  11. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Bar J, et al. Accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight in 840 women with different pregnancy complications prior to induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:172-176
  12. Colman A, Maharaj D, Hutton J, et al. Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies. N Z Med J 20068;119:2146-2149
  13. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M, et al. Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimete in normal pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Biol 2007;130:187- 192
  14. Nelson L, Wharton B, Grobman WA. P