Journals / Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations / 2013 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Objektif refraksiyon kusuru ölçümü: Plusoptix s08 ile standart bir otorefraktometrenin karşılaştırılması

Objective measurement of refractive errors: Comparison of plusoptix s08 with a standard autorefractometer

Pages
40–46
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These values were 0.50 (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Comparison of Plusoptix S08 with a standartautorefractometer (Topcon RM 8000B) in children andadults.Methods: 220 eyes of 110 children, with a mean age of8.06 ± 2.89 years old were examined to compare non-cycloplegic measurements provided by Plusoptix S08and cycloplegic measurements provided by Topcon RM-8000B autorefractometer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, 254 eyes of 127adults, with a mean age of 33.3 ± 13.36 years old were examined to compare non-cycloplegic refractive mea- surements provided by Plusoptix S08 and Topcon RM 8000B autorefractometer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These values were 0.50 (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of Plusoptix S08 with a standartautorefractometer (Topcon RM 8000B) in children andadults.Methods: 220 eyes of 110 children, with a mean age of8.06 ± 2.89 years old were examined to compare non-cycloplegic measurements provided by Plusoptix S08and cycloplegic measurements provided by Topcon RM-8000B autorefractometer. In addition, 254 eyes of 127adults, with a mean age of 33.3 ± 13.36 years old were examined to compare non-cycloplegic refractive mea- surements provided by Plusoptix S08 and Topcon RM 8000B autorefractometer. All measurements were repeat- ed three times. Median sphere, cylinder, spherical equiva- lent and cylindrical axes as Jackson cross cylinder power measurements (J0 and J45) were compared statistically.Results: The median differences in spheres, cylinders, spherical equivalents, J0 and J45 powers were –0.25 D (P< 0.001), –0.25 D (P< 0.001), –0.25 D (P< 0.001), –0.02 (P= 0.038), 0.00 (P= 0.395), in children, respec- tively. These values were 0.50 (P

Özet

Amaç: Çocuklarda ve erişkinlerdeki refraksiyon kusuruölçümünde, Plusoptix S08 ile standart bir oto refraktometre (Topcon RM 8000B) ölçümlerinin karşılaştırılması. Yöntemler: Yaş ortalaması 8.06 ± 2.89 yıl olan 110 çocuğun 220 gözü Plusoptix S08 ile sikloplejisiz olarak, Top- con RM-8000B otorefraktometresiyle sikloplejili olarakölçüldü. Elde edilen değerler karşılaştırıldı. Ayrıca, yaşortalaması 33,3 ± 13,4 olan 127 yetişkinin 254 gözü, Plu-soptix S08 ve Topcon RM 8000B otorefraktometre ile sik-loplejisiz olarak ölçülerek, bu ölçümlerin karşılaştırması yapıldı. Tüm ölçümler üç kez tekrarlandı. Ortalama sferik, silindirik, sferik ekivalan ve silindirik aks değerleri istatis- tiksel olarak karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama sferik, silindirik, sferik ekivalan, J0 ve J45 güçleri çocuklarda sırasıyla: –0.25 D (p< 0.001), –0.25 D (p< 0.001), –0.25 D (p< 0.001), –0.02 (p= 0.038), 0.00 (p= 0.395) bulundu. Erişkinlerde ise 0.50 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLAK, Ş., ÇOLAK, C., YUVACI, İ., DEMİREL, S., CUMURCU, T. (2022). Objektif refraksiyon kusuru ölçümü: Plusoptix s08 ile standart bir otorefraktometrenin karşılaştırılması. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 40–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/561791

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Pesudovs K, Weisinger HS. A comparison of autore- fractor performance. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:554-558
  2. Hodi S, Wood IC. Comparison of the techniques of videorefraction and static retinoscopy in the measure- ment of refractive error in infants. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994;14:20-24
  3. Choong YF, Chen AH, Goh PP. A comparison of autore- fraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:68-74
  4. Davies LN, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B.Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:320-324
  5. Kennedy RA, Thomas DE. Evaluation of the iScreen digital screening system for amblyogenic factors. Can J Ophthalmol 2000;35:258-262
  6. Schmidt P, Maguire M, Dobson V, et al. Vision in Preschoolers Study Group. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:637-650 7. Cooper CD, Gole GA, Hall JE, et al. Evaluating photoscreeners II: MTI and fortune videorefractor. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1999;27:387-398
  7. Schmucker C, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: a systematic review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:1441-1454
  8. Paff T, Oudesluys-Murphy AM, Wolterbeek R, et al. Screening for refractive errors in children: the Plusop- tiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy. J AAPOS 2010;14:478-483
  9. Schaeffel F, Mathis U, Brüggemann G. Noncycloplegic photorefractive screening in pre-school children with the “PowerRefractor” in a pediatric practice. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:630-639
  10. Howland HC. Photorefraction of eyes: history and future prospects. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:603-606 12. Matta NS, Arnold RW, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Comparison between the Plusoptix and MTI Photoscreen- ers. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1591-1595
  11. Erdurmuş M, Yagci R, Karadag R, et al. A comparison of photorefraction and retinoscopy in children. J AA- POS 2007;11:606-611
  12. Rotsos T, Grigoriou D, Kokkolaki A, et al. A comparison of manifest refractions, cycloplegic refractions and retinoscopy on the RMA-3000 autorefractom- eter in children aged 3 to 15 years. Clin Ophthalmol 2009;3:429-431
  13. Zhao J, Mao J, Luo R, et al. Accuracy of noncycloplegic autorefraction in school-age childre