SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2011 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Posterior fixation of lumbar burst fractures. comparison of short segment and long segment pedicle fixation

Lomber patlama kırıklarında posterior fiksasyon. kısa segment ve uzun segment pedikül fiksasyon karşılaştırması

Ömer ERŞEN
Kenan KOCA
Tolga EGE
Erbil OĞUZ
Ali ŞEHİRLİOĞLU
Serkan BİLGİÇ
Pages
15–18
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In follow up there were no differrence between correction loss of two groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim The aim of this study was to compare the effect of short segment and long segment posterior fixation methods on deformity correction and preservtion of correction in lumbar burst fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods In this study we evaluate 40 patients (9 female, 31 male) treated surgically due to lumbar burst fracture between 2000 and 2008.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In follow up there were no differrence between correction loss of two groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to compare the effect of short segment and long segment posterior fixation methods on deformity correction and preservtion of correction in lumbar burst fractures. Material and Methods In this study we evaluate 40 patients (9 female, 31 male) treated surgically due to lumbar burst fracture between 2000 and 2008. Results Twenty six L2 fractures, twelve L3 fractures of 38 patients were included in this study. Sagittal deformities after the fracture were evaluated by preoperatively, postoperatively and last follow up X-rays according to anterior corpus height loss (ACHL), sagittal index and local kyphosis angle (LKA). Conclusions Between two groups there were no statistically difference of ACHL and LKA. In follow up there were no differrence between correction loss of two groups.

Özet

Amaç Bu çalışmanın amacı lomber patlama kırıklarında deformitenin düzeltilmesi ve bu düzelmenin korunmasında kısa ve uzun segment posterior fiksasyon yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler Bu çalışmada 2000-2008 yılları arasında lomber patlama kırığı nedeniyle kliniğimizde cerrahi olarak tedavi edilmiş olan 40 hasta (9 kadın, 31 erkek) retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular Çalışmaya dahil edilen 38 hastanın 12sinde L3, 26sında L2 yaralanması mevcuttu. Kırık sonrası oluşan sagittal deformiteler ameliyat öncesi, ameliyat sonrası ve takip grafilerinde anterior korpus yükseklik kaybı (AKYK), sagittal indeks ve lokal kifoz açısı (LKA) ile değerlendirildi. Sonuç İki grup arasında AKYK ve LKA değerlendirmelerinde ve takiplerdeki düzelme miktarlarındaki kayıplar arasında istatistiksel olarak fark bulunmadığı izlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERŞEN, Ö., KOCA, K., EGE, T., OĞUZ, E., ŞEHİRLİOĞLU, A., BİLGİÇ, S. (2022). Posterior fixation of lumbar burst fractures. comparison of short segment and long segment pedicle fixation. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 15–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/561514

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Mermelstein LE, McLain RF, Yerby SA. Reinforcement of the thoracolumbar burst fractures with calcium phosphate cement. Spine 1998;23:664–71
  2. Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Yazici M, Oznur A, Surat A. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: does transpedicular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failures. Spine 2001;26:213–7
  3. Mahar A, Kim C, Wedemeyer M, Mitsunaga L, Odell T, Johnson B, Garfin S. Short- Segment Fixation of Lumbar Burst Fractures Using Pedicle Fixation at the Level of the Fracture Spine 2007; 32: (14), 1503–1507
  4. Gurwitz GS, Dawson J, Mc Namara MJ, Federspiel CF, Spenger Dm. Biomechanical analysis of three surgical approaches for lumbar burst fractures using short segment instrumentation. Spine 1993;18:977-982
  5. Knop C, Bastian L, Lange U, Oeser M, Zdichavski M, Blauth M. Complications in surgical treatment of thoracolombar injuries. Eur. Spine J. 2002; 11(3):214-226
  6. McCormak T, Kariokovic E, Gaines RW. The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine 1994;19: 1741-1744
  7. Guven O, Kocaoglu B, Bezer M, Aydin M, Nalbantoglu U. The Use of Screw at the Fracture Level in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22: 6
  8. Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with polymethyl methacrylate vertebroplasty and shortsegment pedicle screw fixation. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:1354–1360
  9. Knop C, Fabian HF, Bastian L, Blauth M. Late results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation and transpedicular bone grafting. Spine 2001;26(1):214-226
  10. Tezeren G, Kuru I. Posterior fixation of thoracolumbar burst fracture: short-segment pedicle fixation versus long-segment instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:485–488
  11. Akbarnia BA, Crandall DG, Burkus K, Matthews T. Use of long rods and short arthrodesis for burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. A long-term follow up study. J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76-A(11):1629-1635
  12. Mumford J, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Goel VK. Thoracolumbar burst fractures. The clinical efficacy and outcome of non-operative management. Spine 1993; 18: 955–970
  13. Farcy JPC, Weidenbaum M, Glasmann SD. Sagittal index in management of thoaracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 1990; 9: 958–965
  14. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M. Toward Uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations: a paradigm applied to PLIF. Spine1986; 11: 601–606
  15. Denis F. Spinal instability as defined by threee co