Journals / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2012 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

How did general surgery department of a training hospital change in ten years?

Eğitim hastanesi genel cerrahi kliniği 10 yılda nasıl değişim gösterdi?

Pages
320–324
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After ten years, the patients were younger, more commonly male, emergency cases were more common, and operations performed primarily by the residents in training were less frequent than the former period (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim:To investigate the changes in a training hospital’s surgical patient profile in ten years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The number of elective and emergent operations during the former and the latter periods were 2668 and 2041, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After ten years, the patients were younger, more commonly male, emergency cases were more common, and operations performed primarily by the residents in training were less frequent than the former period (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2041 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim:To investigate the changes in a training hospital’s surgical patient profile in ten years. To delineate the effects of the transfer of Social Security Institution Hospitals to the Ministry of Health on this process. Material and Method: Ten-year apart, two-year periods were selected and all elective and emergency cases were retrospectively searched. In between periods, the hospital was transferred from Social Security Institution Hospital to the Ministry of Health and then became a trauma center. The indications, techniques, the number of performed surgeries, and the patient related factors were compared. The ratio of the number emergency cases and the number of cases performed by residents in training to the total number of cases were investigated. Results: The number of elective and emergent operations during the former and the latter periods were 2668 and 2041, respectively. The percentage of the decrease was 23.5%. After ten years, the patients were younger, more commonly male, emergency cases were more common, and operations performed primarily by the residents in training were less frequent than the former period (p

Özet

Amaç:Bir eğitim hastanesinin cerrahi olgu profilinde 10 yılda yaşanan değişimleri saptamak. Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu hastanelerinin Sağlık Bakanlığı’na devrinin bu sürece etkisini değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: On yıl ara ile iki yıllık, iki dönem seçilerek elektif ve acil koşullarda yapılan tüm ameliyatlar geriye dönük olarak tarandı. Bu iki periyodun arasında hastane Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu’ndan Sağlık Bakanlığı’na devredildi, daha sonra da travma merkezi oldu. Operasyon sayıları, endikasyonları, teknikleri ve hastalara ait özellikler karşılaştırıldı. Ayrıca toplam operasyonlar içinde acil oranları ve eğitim amaçlı öncellikli olarak asistana yaptırılan ameliyat sayıları araştırıldı. Bulgular: Acil veya elektif olarak ilk dönemde 2668, sonraki dönemde ise 2041 ameliyat yapılmıştı. İkinci dönemde ameliyat sayısında %23,5 oranında düşüş tespit edildi. On yıl aradan sonraki iki yıllık dönemde ameliyat edilen hastalar daha genç, erkek cins sıklığı ve acil ameliyat oranı daha yüksek, uzmanlık öğrencilerine yaptırılan ameliyat sayıları daha düşüktü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, O., AKINCI, M., ERGÜL, Z., KULAÇOĞLU, H., BARAN, İ., UĞURLU, C. (2022). How did general surgery department of a training hospital change in ten years?. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 320–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/561441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. İzmirli M, Altın S, Dernek BÖ, Ünsal M. SSK Okmeydanı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Onkoloji Merkezi’nin 1999–2004 yılları kanser istatistikleri. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, 2007;22:172–82
  2. Hinton TG, Alexakhin R, Balonov M, Gentner N, Hendry J, Prister B, et al. Radiation-induced effects on plants and animals: findings of the United Nations Chernobyl Forum. Health Phys 2007;93:427–40
  3. Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A, Søreide K, Søreide JA. Trends in Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011; May 13. (Basım aşamasında
  4. Schwartz RW, Pogge C.Physician leadership: essential skills in a changing environment. Am J Surg 2000;180:187–92
  5. Roberts-Thomson IC, Singh R, Teo E, Nguyen NQ, Lidums I. The future of endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25:1051–7
  6. Reavis KM, Melvin WS. Advanced endoscopic technologies. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1533–46
  7. Malik A, Mellinger JD, Hazey JW, Dunkin BJ, MacFadyen BV Jr. Endoluminal and transluminal surgery: current status and future possibilities. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1179–92
  8. Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic surgery: current status, issues and future developments. Surgeon 2005;3:125–30-,132–3,135–8
  9. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh. Ann Surg 2002;235:322–32
  10. Millikan KW. Incisional hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1223–34
  11. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, d’Angelo T, Steinberg SM, Pierce L, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;332:907–11
  12. Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, Smith SL, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer 2003;98:697–702
  13. Pelizzo MR, Merante Boschin I, Toniato A, Sorgato N, Marzola MC, Rubello D. Surgical therapeutic planning options in nodular goiter. Minerva Endocrinol 2010;35:173–85
  14. Mazlum M, Dilek FH, Yener AN, Tokyol Ç, Aktepe F, Dilek ON. Profile of gallbladder diseases diagnosed at Afyon Kocatepe University: A retrospective study. Türk Patoloji Dergisi 2011;27:23–30
  15. Tababet Uzmanlık Tüzüğü 17. Yaylacı S, Yücel Ö, Hancı İH. Asistan hekimlerin ve aile hekimi adayı öğrencilerin müdahalelerinden doğan yasal sorumluluk. Adli Bilimler Dergisi 2009;8:49-