Journals / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2012 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

Penil fraktür tanı ve tedavisinde 8 yıllık deneyimimiz

Our 8 years experience on penile fractures: The diagnosis and treatment

Pages
429–431
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: Although conservative treatment options were adviced, many authors prefer surgery because of the rapid recovery, short hospitalization duration, less morbidity and less penil curvature during the long term period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study to present our experience with diagnosis and treatment management of penile fracture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Patients who were admitted our clinic with complaints of sudden penile swelling and pain during 8 years were screened.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: Although conservative treatment options were adviced, many authors prefer surgery because of the rapid recovery, short hospitalization duration, less morbidity and less penil curvature during the long term period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study to present our experience with diagnosis and treatment management of penile fracture. Material and Method: Patients who were admitted our clinic with complaints of sudden penile swelling and pain during 8 years were screened. Clinical information of 30 patients aged between 16 and 45 retrospectively analyzed. The patients had applied to emergency room during the first 10 hours following penile swelling and pain. Results: Penile fracture was detected in 28 patients and dorsal penile vein rupture mimicking penile fracture was detected in 2 patients. The most common etiologies of penile fracture were coitus and manually bending the penis for detumescence. Diagnoses were made based on history and physical examination. The treatment was surgical in 28 cases with subcoronal circumferential degloving incision and 2 patients were treated with vein ligation due to dorsal vein rupture. Erectile dysfunction or penile curvature were not detected (except the last five cases) during a mean follow up of 18.7 months (range 8-28). Discussion: Although conservative treatment options were adviced, many authors prefer surgery because of the rapid recovery, short hospitalization duration, less morbidity and less penil curvature during the long term period.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız penil fraktürün tanı ve tedavi yaklaşımında-ki deneyimimizi sunmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Son 8 yıl içinde kliniğimize pe-niste aniden gelişen şişkinlik ve ağrı nedeniyle başvuran hastaların kayıtla-rı incelendi. Yaşları 16 ile 45 arasında değişen toplam 30 hastanın klinik bil-gileri retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Tüm hastalar acil servise peniste-ki şişlik ve ağrıyı takip eden 10 saat içinde başvurmuşlardı. Bulgular: Başvu-ran bu hastaların 28’inde penil fraktür, 2 olguda ise penil fraktürü taklit eden dorsal ven rüptürü gözlendi. Penil fraktür etyolojisindeki en sık nedenler cin-sel ilişki ve penis ereksiyonunu sonlandırmak için penisin elle bükülmesi ola-rak tesbit edildi. Tüm olguların tanısı hasta hikayesi ve fiziki muayene ile ko-nuldu. Olguların 28’i cerrahi olarak, 2’si ise dorsal ven rüptüründen dolayı dor-sal ven ligasyonu ile tedavi edildi. Son 5 olgu hariç diğer vakalarda 18.7 ay (8-28 arası) takip süresince erektil disfonksiyon veya penil kurvatur gözlen-medi. Sonuç: Penil fraktür olgularında konservatif yaklaşımı önerenler oldu-ğu gibi daha hızlı iyileşme, hastanede kısa kalış süresi,daha az morbidite ve uzun sürede daha az penil kurvatur gelişmesi nedeniyle cerrahi tedaviyi öne-ren otörler çoğunluktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEÇEN, K., TAKEN, K., PİRİNCCİ, N., GÜNES, M., GECİT, I., CEYLAN, K. (2022). Penil fraktür tanı ve tedavisinde 8 yıllık deneyimimiz. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 429–431. https://ajindex.com/articles/561386

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. McAninch JW, editors. Penile fracture and soft tissue injury. Traumatic and Reconstructive Urology. Philadelphia:W. B, Saunders; 1996. p. 693-8
  2. Eke N. Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg 2002;89:555-65
  3. Klein FA, Smith V, Miller N. Penile fracture: Diagnosis and management. J Trauma 1985;25:1090-2
  4. Fergany AF, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Review of Cleveland Clinic experience with penile fracture. Urology 1999;54:352–55
  5. Van Der Horst C, Martinez Portillo FJ, Seif C, Groth W, Junemann KP. Male genital injury: diagnostics and treatment Br J Urol Int 2004;93:927–30
  6. Ruckle CH, Hadley HR, Lui PD. Fracture of the penis: Diagnosis and management. Urology 1992;40:33-35
  7. Koifman L, Cavalcanti AG, Manes CH, Filho DR, Favorito LA. Penile fracture experience in 56 cases. Int Braz J Urol 2003;29:35-39
  8. Tsang T, Demby AM. Penile fracture with urethral injury. J Urol 1992;147:466-68
  9. Mydlo JH, Hayyeri M, Macchia RJ. Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fracture: A comparison with surgical findings. Urology 1998;51:616-19
  10. Nehru-Babu M, Hendry D, Ai-Saffar N. Rupture of the dorsal vein mimicking fracture of the penis. BJU Int 1999;84:179-80
  11. Mc Aninc JW, Santucci RA. Genitourinary trauma. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan E D, Wein AJ, editors. Campbell’s Urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004; p. 3707-40
  12. El-Bahnasawy MS, Gomha MA. Penile fractures: the successful outcome of immediate surgical intervention. Int J Impot Res 2000;12:273-77
  13. Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah. Iran: report of 172 cases. J Urol 2000;164:364-66
  14. Pruthi RS, Petrus CD, Nidess R, Venable DD. Penile fracture of the proximal corporeal body. J Urol 2000;164:447–48
  15. Abolyosr A, Moneim AE, Abdelatif AM, Abdalla MA, Imam HM. The management of penile fracture based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Br J Urol 2005;96:373–77
  16. Asgari MA, Hosseini SY, Safarinejad MR, Samadzadeh B, Bardideh AR. Penile fractures: evaluation, therapeutic approaches and long-term results. J Urol 1996;155:148–9
  17. Bhatt S, Kocakoc E, Rubens DJ, Seftel AD, Dogra VS. Sonographic evaluation of penile trauma. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:93-1000
  18. Kervancioglu S, Ozkur A, Bayram MM. Color Doppler sonographic findings in penile fracture. J Clin Ultrasound 2005;33:38-42
  19. Bujons Tur A, Rodríguez Ledesma JM, Cetina Errando A, Puigvert Martínez A, Iglesias Guzmán JC, Villavicencio Mavrich H. Penile hematoma seconda