SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6

Oosit Pick-Up İşleminde Anesteziklerin Oosit Kalitesi ve Gebelik Üzerindeki Etkileri

Effect of Anesthetics During Oocyte Pick-Up Procedure on Oocyte Quality and Pregnancy

Aslı YAYLALI
Aykut URFALIOĞLU
Pages
840–843
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Propofol consumption was mean 170mg (320-120 mg) in Group P and mean 140mg (190-110 mg) in Group PK (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Different anaesthesia methods can be used in the oocyte pick-up (OPU) procedure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate anaesthetics used in OPU in our centre through examination of procedure and recovery times, estradiol (E2) levels, numbers of total, mature (M2) and fertilised oocytes, and pregnancy rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Propofol consumption was mean 170mg (320-120 mg) in Group P and mean 140mg (190-110 mg) in Group PK (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Different anaesthesia methods can be used in the oocyte pick-up (OPU) procedure. General anaesthetics may affect the quality of the oocytes by passing into the follicles. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate anaesthetics used in OPU in our centre through examination of procedure and recovery times, estradiol (E2) levels, numbers of total, mature (M2) and fertilised oocytes, and pregnancy rates. Material and Method: The demographic data of patients applied with anaesthesia for OPU were examined together with the anaesthetics and amounts used, recovery time, numbers of total, M2 and fertilised oocytes, and pregnancy rates. The patients were separated into 2 groups as Group P, where only propofol was used in induction, and Group PK where propofol+ ketamine was used. Results: The demographic data were similar in both groups. Propofol consumption was mean 170mg (320-120 mg) in Group P and mean 140mg (190-110 mg) in Group PK (p

Özet

Amaç: Overlerden oosit toplanması olarak tanımlanan, oosit pick-up (OPU) işleminde farklı anestezi yöntemleri kullanılabilmektedir. Genel anestezikler foliküllere geçerek oosit kalitesini etkileyebilmektedir. Merkezimizdeki OPU işlemlerinde anestezikler, işlem ve derlenme süreleri ile estradiol (E2) düzeyleri, toplam, matür (M2) ve fertilize oosit sayıları, gebelik oranlarının retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: OPU nedeniyle anestezi uygulanan hastaların demografik verileri (yaş, boy, kilo, total prosedür süresi), anestezikler ve tüketim miktarları, derlenme süreleri, toplam, M2, fertilize oosit sayıları ve gebelik oranları incelendi. Hastalar indüksiyonda; sadece propofol uygulanan (Grup P) ve propofol-ketamin uygulanan hastalar (Grup PK) olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. Bulgular: Her iki gruptaki demografik veriler benzerdi. Propofol tüketim miktarları grup P'de 170 mg, grup PK'da 140 mg idi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YAYLALI, A., URFALIOĞLU, A. (2022). Oosit Pick-Up İşleminde Anesteziklerin Oosit Kalitesi ve Gebelik Üzerindeki Etkileri. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6, 840–843. https://ajindex.com/articles/561327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sharma A, Borle A, Trikha A. Anesthesia for in vitro fertilization. J Obstet An- aesth Crit Care 2015;5(2):62-72.
  2. Vhalos NF, Giannakikou I, Vlachos A, Vitoratos N. Analgesia and anesthesia for assisted reproductive technologies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;105(3):201-5.
  3. Vasudevan B, Borle A, Singh PM, Ramachandran R, Rewari V, Trikha A. The ef- fect of anesthetic technique for transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval on reproductive outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet An- aesth Crit Care 2015;5(2):54-61.
  4. Matsota P, Sidıiopoulou T, Batistaki C, Giannaris D, Pandazi A, Krepi H et al. Analgesia with remifentanil versus anesthesia with propofol-alfentanil for trans- vaginal oocyte retrieval: A randomised trial on their impact on in vitro fertilization outcome. MEJ ANESTH 2012;21(5):685-92.
  5. Yasmin E, Dresner M, Balen A. Sedation and anaesthesia for transvaginal oocyte collection: an evaluation of practice in the UK. Hum Reprod 2004;19(12):2942-5.
  6. Soussis I, Boyd O, Paraschos T, Duffy S, Bower S, Troughton P et al. Follicular fluid levels of midazolam, fentanyl and alfentanil during transvaginal oocyte re- trieval. Fertil Steril 1995;64(5):1003-7.
  7. Janssenswillen C, Christiaens F, Camu F, Van Steirteghem A. The effect of pro- pofol on parthenogenetic activation, in vitro fertilization and early development of Mouse oocytes. Fertil Steril 1997;67(4):769-74.
  8. Circeo L, Grow D, Kashikar A, Gibson C. Prospective, observational study of the depth of anesthesia during oocyte retrieval using a total intravenous technique and the Bispectral index monitor. Fertil Steril 2011;96(3):635-7.
  9. Hong JY, Jee YS, Luthardt FW. Comparison of conscious sedation for oo- cyte retrieval between low-anxiety and high-anxiety patients. J Clin Anesth;17(7):549-53.
  10. Edwards JA, Kinsella J, Shaw A, Evans S, Anderson KJ. Sedation for oocyte retrieval using target controlled infusion of propofol and incremental alfentanil delivered by non-anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 2010;65(5):453-61.
  11. Murthy TVSP, Gupta P, Sharma RK. Anaesthetic issues in in-vitro fertilizations. MJAFI 2008;64(2):119-22.
  12. Christiaens F, Janssenswillen C, Verborgh C, Moerman I, Devroery P, Steirteg- hem AV et al. Propofol concentrations in follicular fluid during general anaesthesia for transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod 1999;14(2):345-8.
  13. Ben-Sholomo I, Moskovich R, Golan J, Eyali V, Tabak A, Shalev E. The effect of propofol anaesthesia on oocyte fertilization and early embryo quality. Hum Reprod