Journals / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2013 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 5

Cerrahi enfeksiyonlarda antimikrobiyal profilaksiye güncel bakış

Antimicrobial prophylaxis overview of current surgical infections

Pages
423–428
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Current approaches for the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis are discussed in this review.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Surgical wound infections are the second most common healthcare-associ- ated infection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although usually localized to the incision site, surgical wound infections can also extend into adjacent deeper structures; thus, the term surgical wound infection has now been replaced with the more suitable name, surgical site infection (SSI).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Current approaches for the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis are discussed in this review.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Surgical wound infections are the second most common healthcare-associ- ated infection. Although usually localized to the incision site, surgical wound infections can also extend into adjacent deeper structures; thus, the term surgical wound infection has now been replaced with the more suitable name, surgical site infection (SSI). The term ‘antimicrobial prophylaxis’ is that the administration of antimicrobial drug before or just after a person’s exposing to causative agent to prevent an infection. Nowadays, antimicrobial prophylaxis can be divided into two categories as surgical prophylaxis and nonsurgical prophylaxis. A large amount of antimicrobial prophylaxis includes surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. It is known that there are some mistakes during the administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, such as incorrect indication, incorrect administration time of the antimicrobial drugs, unnecessary long term administration, and incorrect drug selection. Current approaches for the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis are discussed in this review.

Özet

Cerrahi yara enfeksiyonları; sağlık hizmetleri ile ilişkili enfeksiyonların en sıkikinci nedenidir. Genellikle insizyon alanı ile sınırlı olmasına rağmen, cerrahiyara enfeksiyonları yakın derin dokulara kadar uzanabilir. Bu nedenle cerrahi yara enfeksiyonları yerine cerrahi alan enfeksiyonu (CAE) daha uygun birtanımdır. Enfeksiyonların gelişmesini engellemek amacıyla etkenle karşılaşmadan önce veya karşılaştıktan hemen sonra koruyucu olarak antimikrobiyalilaç kullanılmasına ‘antimikrobiyal profilaksi’ denir. Günümüzde antimikrobiyal profilaksiyi; cerrahi antimikrobiyal profilaksi ve cerrahi dışı antimikrobiyal profilaksi olmak üzere ikiye ayırarak incelemek mümkündür. Antimikrobiyal profilaksinin önemli bir kısmını cerrahi antimikrobiyal profilaksi oluşturmaktadır. Cerrahi antimikrobiyal profilaksi uygulaması sırasında endikasyonun yanlış olması, antimikrobiyal ilaçların veriliş zamanının yanlış olması, gereksiz uzun süreli uygulanım ve yanlış antimikrobiyal ilaç seçimi gibi bazı hataların olduğu bilinmektedir. Bu derlemede cerrahi antimikrobiyal profilaksideki güncel yaklaşımlar irdelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARTUK, C., YILMAZ, S. (2022). Cerrahi enfeksiyonlarda antimikrobiyal profilaksiye güncel bakış. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 5, 423–428. https://ajindex.com/articles/561289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Thomas R. Surgical site infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis. In: Mandell GL, Douglas RG, Bennett JE, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 7th ed. New York: Chuchill Livingstone. 2009:3891-904. 2.Dökmetaş İ. Cerrahide profilaktik antibiyotik kullanımı. Klimik Dergisi.2001;14(3):135-39. 3.De Lalla F. Perioperative anitibiotic prophylaxis: a critical review. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006;7(Suppl 2):s.37-39. 4.Leblebicioğlu H. Cerrahide antimikrobiyal profilaksi. Klimik Derg. 1996;9(2):60- 63. 5.Won SY, Wong ES. Surgical Site Infections. Mayhall CG. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Contorl. Fourth Edition.
  2. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, 2011;s.986-1004. 6.Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorny K, Burstin H, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(Suppl 1):s.51-61. 7.Perencevich EN, Sands KE, Cosgrove SE, Guadagnoli E, Meara E, Platt R. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(2):196-203. 8.Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Chen LF, Schmader KE, Choi Y, Sloane R, et al. Clinical and financial outcomes due to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection: a multi-center matched outcomes study. PLoS One. 2009;4(12):s.8305. 9. Shuman EK, Urquhart A, Malani PN. Management and prevention of prosthetic joint infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012;26(1):29-39. 10. Enzler MJ, Berbari E, Osmon DR. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in adults. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(7):686-701. 11.Ronald, AR, Conway, B. An approach to urinary tract infections in ambulatory women. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis. 1988;9:76-125. 12. van Kasteren ME, Manniën J, Ott A, Kullberg BJ, de Boer AS, Gyssens IC. Antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections following total hip arthroplasty: timely administration is the most important factor. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(7):921-27. 13. Dellinger EP. Prophylactic antibiotics: administration and timing before operation are more important than administration after operation. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(7):928-30. 14.Wittmann DH, Schein M. Let us shorten antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy in surgery. Am J Surg 1996; 172(Suppl 6A):26-32. 15. Al-Momany NH, Al-Bakri AG, Makahleh ZM, Wazaify MM. Adherence to international antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in cardiac surgery: a Jordanian study demonstrates need for quality improvement. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009;1