Journals / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Karotis Cisim Tümörlerinde Tanı ve Cerrahi Tedavi

Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Carotid Body Tumors

Pages
490–492
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Arterial continuity should be maintained and special attention should be made to avoid damaging adjacent vascular and neural structures during dissection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Carotid body tumors are rare benign tumors of the neck.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study is focused on the surgical strategy and results of the patients who were operated for carotid body tumor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Arterial continuity should be maintained and special attention should be made to avoid damaging adjacent vascular and neural structures during dissection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Carotid body tumors are rare benign tumors of the neck. Excision of the tumor is the main goal of the surgical procedure. This study is focused on the surgical strategy and results of the patients who were operated for carotid body tumor. Material and Method: 10 patients with a mean age 49±9 years; ranging from 41-69 years with carotid body tumor underwent operation in our hospital between 2004-2013. Diagnosis was made using computerized tomography; magnetic resonance imaging or digital substraction angiography after the initial doppler ultrasonography. According to Shamblin classification; 2 patients have type 3 and 8 patients have type 2 carotid body tumors. Results: There was no postoperative mortality. There were no neurologic sequelae after the operation. The follow-up period was 44.11± 34.62 months (range 2-98 months). Hoarseness developed in one patient postoperatively and it disappeared 2 months after the operation. Two patients with deviation of the tongue and pytosis of the right eyelid had the same symptoms after the operation. In one patient; hoarseness and dysphagia had continued. Reoperations were done due to recurrence of the tumor in two (20%) patients. Discussion: Surgical excision is the best treatment modality for glomus caroticum tumors. Arterial continuity should be maintained and special attention should be made to avoid damaging adjacent vascular and neural structures during dissection.

Özet

Amaç: Glomus karotikum tümörleri boyun bölgesinin nadir görülen tümörlerindendir. Cerrrahinin esas amacı tümörün eksize edilip çıkartılmasıdır. Bu çalışma; ameliyat edilen hastalardaki cerrahi strateji ve cerrahi sonuçlar üzerine odaklanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastanemizde; 2004-2013 yılları arasında; 10 hasta (ortalama yaş 49±9; 41-69 yaş arası) karotikum tümörü tanısı ile ameliyat edilmiştir. Tanı bilgisayarlı tomografi; manyetik rezonans görüntüleme veya Doppler ultrasonografiyi takiben yapılan dijital substraction anjiyografi ile konulmuştur. Shamblin sınıflandırmasına gore 2 hasta tip 3 ve 8 hasta da tip 2 olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Cerrahi sonrası mortalite gözlenmedi. Ameliyat sonrasında hastalarda nörolojik sekel görülmedi. Takip süresi 44.11±34.62 ay(dağılım 2-98 ay) olarak saptandı. Ses kısıklığı postoperatif dönemde bir hastada meydana gelmiş olup ameliyat sonrası 2. ayda kaybolmuştur. 2 hastada preoperatif dönemde mevcut olan dilde deviyasyon ve sağ gözdeki pitozis ameliyat sonrasında da devam etti. 1 hastada ses kısıklığı ve disfaji devam etti. 2 hasta tümör rekürensi nedeni ile tekrar ameliyat edildi. Sonuç: Glomus karotikum tümörlerinin tedavisinde en iyi yöntem cerrahidir. Arteriyal yapıların devamlılığının korunması ve cerrahi sırasında komşu vasküler ve sinir yapıların hasar görmemesi için azami dikkat gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİRİNCİOĞLU, C. L., ÖZEN, A., AKSÖYEK, A., ÜNAL, E. U., SORAN, B. T., AYTEKİN, B., KİRİŞ, E., KUBAT, E. (2022). Karotis Cisim Tümörlerinde Tanı ve Cerrahi Tedavi. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 490–492. https://ajindex.com/articles/560988

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Mataracı İ, Rabuş MB, Kırali K, Kıran B, Yanartaş M, Sunar H ve ark. Karotis cisim tümörlerinin tanı ve cerrahi tedavisi. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg 2008;16(2):86-90
  2. Shamblin WR, Re Mine WH, Sheps SG, Harrison EG. Carotid body tumor (chenodectoma). Clinicopathologic analysis of ninety cases. Am J Surg 1971;122:732-9
  3. Baysal BE, Myers EN. Etiopathogenesis and clinical presentation of carotid body tumors. Microsc Res Tech 2002;59:256-61
  4. Ridge BA, Brewster DC, Darling RC, Cambria RP, LaMuraglia GM, Abbott WM. Familial carotid body tumors: incidence and implications. Ann Vasc Surg 1993;7:190-4
  5. Rodríguez-Cuevas S, López-Garza J, Labastida-Almendaro S. Carotid body tumors in inhabitants of altitudes higher than 2000 meters above sea level. Head Neck 1998;20:374-8
  6. Kunt A, Bulut F, Demir CS. Karotis cisim tümörleri. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg 2003;11:198-200
  7. Hallett JW Jr, Nora JD, Hollier LH, Cherry KJ Jr, Pairolero PC. Trends in neurovascular complications of surgical management for carotid body and cervical paragangliomas: a fifty-year experience with 153 tumors. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:284-91
  8. Persky MS, Setton A, Yasunari N, Hartman J, Frank D, Berenstein A. Combined endovascular and surgical treatment of head and neck parangliomas: a team approach. Head Neck 2002;24:423–31
  9. Amoto B, Bianco T, Compagna R, Siano M, Esposito G, Buffone G, Serra R et al. Surgical resection of carotid body paragangliomas. Am J Surg 2013; doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.06.002.