SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Perkütan nefrolitotominin cerrahi sonuçlarının öngörülmesi: Guy taş skoru ve nefrolitometrik nomogramın başarı ve komplikasyon validasyonu

Predicting surgical outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Validation of the Guy's stone score and nephrolithometric nomogram in terms of success and complications

Mehmet Reşit GÖREN
Tulga EĞİLMEZ
Pages
281–286
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Stone burden was the only pre-operative, operative andpost-operative variable that had a statistically signifcant correlation bothwith success and also with the complications encountered (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This single institution retrospective study aims to validate the abilityof Guy s stone score and the nephrolithometric nomogram to predict thesuccess of PCNL and to assess the correlation of the scoring systems withthe complications encountered.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Medical fles of 1646adult patients to whom a PCNL operation was performed were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Stone burden was the only pre-operative, operative andpost-operative variable that had a statistically signifcant correlation bothwith success and also with the complications encountered (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This single institution retrospective study aims to validate the abilityof Guy s stone score and the nephrolithometric nomogram to predict thesuccess of PCNL and to assess the correlation of the scoring systems withthe complications encountered. Material and Method: Medical fles of 1646adult patients to whom a PCNL operation was performed were reviewed. Atotal of 1325 patients fulflled the needed criteria and were included in thestudy. Study variables were recorded from the medical fles for statisticalanalysis. Results: Stone burden was the only pre-operative, operative andpost-operative variable that had a statistically signifcant correlation bothwith success and also with the complications encountered (p

Özet

Amaç: Tek merkezden retrospektif olarak yapılan bu çalışmanın amacı, Guytaş skoru ve nefrolithometrik nomogram kabiliyeti ile PCNL başarısının öngörülmesi ve gözlemlenen komplikasyonların skorlama sistemleri ile değerlendirilmesinin validasyonunun yapılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: PCNL ameliyatı uygulanan 1646 yetişkin hastanın medikal kayıtları gözden geçirilmiştir.Gerekli kriterleri sağlayan 1325 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. İstatistikselanaliz için gerekli olan veriler hastaların medikal kayıtlarından elde edilmiştir. Bulgular: Gözlemlenen komplikasyonlarla ve başarı ile anlamlı korelasyonunun bulunduğu tek preoperatif, operatif ve postoperatif değişken taş yüküdür (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖREN, M. R., EĞİLMEZ, T. (2022). Perkütan nefrolitotominin cerrahi sonuçlarının öngörülmesi: Guy taş skoru ve nefrolitometrik nomogramın başarı ve komplikasyon validasyonu. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 281–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/560987

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Fernstrom I and Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10(3):257-9. 2. de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutane- ous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2012;62(2):246-55
  2. Dindo D, Demartines N, and Clavien PA. Classifcation of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240(2):205-13
  3. Akman T, Binbay M, Sari E, Yuruk E, Tepeler A, Akcay M, et al. Factors afect- ing bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: single surgeon experience. J Endourol 2011;25(2):327-33
  4. Michel MS, Trojan L, and Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephro- lithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51(4):899-906
  5. El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, Mohsen T, El-Tabey N, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM, et al. Renal access by urologist or radiologist for percutaneous nephrolithotomy--is it still an issue? J Urol 2007;178(3 Pt 1):916-20
  6. Turna B, Umul M, Demiryoguran S, Altay B, and Nazli O. How do increasing stone surface area and stone confguration afect overall outcome of percutane- ous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 2007;21(1):34-43
  7. Olbert PJ, Hegele A, Schrader AJ, Scherag A, and Hofmann R. Pre- and perioperative predictors of short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutane- ous nephrolitholapaxy. Urol Res 2007;35(5):225-30
  8. El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, El-Assmy AM, Mohsen T, Shoma AM, Eraky I, et al. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. J Urol 2007;177(2):576-9
  9. Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tok A, Sari E, and Berberoglu Y. Impact of percutaneous access point number and location on complication and success rates in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int 2006;77(4):340-6
  10. Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, and Glass JM. The Guy’s stone score-- grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology 2011;78(2):277-81
  11. Smith A, Averch TD, Shahrour K, Opondo D, Daels FP, Labate G, et al. A neph- rolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephroli- thotomy. J Urol 2013;190(1):149-56
  12. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Straub M, and Seitz C. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. In: members of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Ofce, editors. EAU Guidelines, edition presented at the 25th EAU Annual Con- gress. Arn