Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

The Psychometric Properties and Clinical Use of the Turkish Version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung (FACT-L) Scale

Pages
139–144
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Dyspnoea, haemoptysis, chest pain, weight loss, anorexia,localised pain, and fever symptoms had a significant correlation with the FACT-L, trial outcome index, and lung cancer subscale.Conclusion:Turkish version of the psychometric properties of the original FACT-L scale is regarded as a valid and reliable tool and can be used safely ina clinical context when managing patients with lung cancer in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives:psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scale and the sensitivity tochanges in clinical indicators.Patients and Methods:This study was conducted within the framework of a national multicentre project.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients with either stage IIIB or IV primary lungcancer diagnosed after April 2010were included in thisstudy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Dyspnoea, haemoptysis, chest pain, weight loss, anorexia,localised pain, and fever symptoms had a significant correlation with the FACT-L, trial outcome index, and lung cancer subscale.Conclusion:Turkish version of the psychometric properties of the original FACT-L scale is regarded as a valid and reliable tool and can be used safely ina clinical context when managing patients with lung cancer in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives:psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scale and the sensitivity tochanges in clinical indicators.Patients and Methods:This study was conducted within the framework of a national multicentre project. Patients with either stage IIIB or IV primary lungcancer diagnosed after April 2010were included in thisstudy. A classical confirmatory approach was used for both the reliability and validity analyses.Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach’s α value, and the validity analysis was performed using construct validity and clinical validity.Results:276 (92.3%) patients were male and the average age was 60.8 ± 9.4 years. The most frequently observed histological type was squamous cellcarcinoma (36.8%), and 61.5% of these stage IV tumours. Cronbachs α values for the subscales ranged from 0.60 to 0.84. The majority of the FACT-Lsubscales revealed inter-scale correlation coefficients greater than 0.35. All sub-dimensions, except that of the social/family well-being scale, are ableto significantly discriminate between stages IIIB and IV. Significantly lower scale scores were detected in patients with stage IV than stage IIIB. Thecomparative fit index was 0.917, and the root mean square error of approximation was 0.091. Dyspnoea, haemoptysis, chest pain, weight loss, anorexia,localised pain, and fever symptoms had a significant correlation with the FACT-L, trial outcome index, and lung cancer subscale.Conclusion:Turkish version of the psychometric properties of the original FACT-L scale is regarded as a valid and reliable tool and can be used safely ina clinical context when managing patients with lung cancer in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKSEL, T., ERBAYCU, A. E., BAYDUR, H., EDİS, E. Ç., HATİPOĞLU, O., GÜRSU, K. K., AYDOĞAN, B. B., YAYLA, B. A., ÖZ, A., ÇELİK, P., BAŞER, S., ESER, E. (2022). The Psychometric Properties and Clinical Use of the Turkish Version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung (FACT-L) Scale. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 139–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/560592

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Globocan 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr/ia/World/atlas.html Accessed: 09 Jan 2014
  2. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;346:92–98. [CrossRef] 3. Ochs J, Grous JJ, Warner KL. Final survival and safety results for 21,064 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received compassionate use gefitinib in a U. S. expanded access program (EAP). J Clin Oncol 2004;22:060
  3. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bullinger M, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–376. [CrossRef] 5. Wan C, Zhang C, Cai L, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the FACT-L for measuring quality of life in patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2007;56:415–421. [CrossRef] 6. Cella DF, Bonomi AE, Lloyd SR, Tulsky DS, Kaplan E, Bonomi P. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy -- Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer 1995;12:199–220. [CrossRef] 7. Brucker PS, Yost K, Cashy J, Webster K, Cella D. General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Eval Health Prof 2005;28:192–211. [CrossRef] 8. Yoo H, Suh C, Kim S, Eremenco S, Kim H, Kim S. Korean translation and validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) version 4. Qual Life Res 2006;15:161–166. [CrossRef] 9. Saitoh E, Yokomizo Y, Chang CH, Eremenco S, Kaneko H, Kobayashi K. Cross-cultural validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung. J. Nippon Med Sch 2007;74:402–408. [CrossRef] 10. Dapueto JJ, Francolino C, Servente L, et al. Evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Spanish version 4 in South America: classic psychometric and item response theory analyses. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:32. [CrossRef] 11. Cella D, Eton D, Fairclough DL, et al. What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:285–295. [CrossRef] 12. Franceschini J, Jardim JR, Fernandes ALG, Jamnik S, Santoro IL. Reliability of the Brazilian version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Lung (FACT‐L