Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Relationship Between Functional Movement Screen Scores and Musculoskeletal Injuries in Youth Male Soccer Players: One-year Retrospective Observation

Pages
371–377
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the study results indicated that the composite FMS score is not a factor that increases the time loss, but that asymmetries can be a factor that increases the time loss.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the success of functional movement screening (FMS) tests performed at the beginning of the season in youth male players for predicting musculoskeletal injuries (MSI) that occurred in the same season.Methods: Fifty seven elite youth male soccer players were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Age, height and body weight of the participants were 15.95±2.44 years, 170.87±12.67 cm and 61.28±13.69 kg, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the study results indicated that the composite FMS score is not a factor that increases the time loss, but that asymmetries can be a factor that increases the time loss.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016–2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the success of functional movement screening (FMS) tests performed at the beginning of the season in youth male players for predicting musculoskeletal injuries (MSI) that occurred in the same season.Methods: Fifty seven elite youth male soccer players were included in the study. Age, height and body weight of the participants were 15.95±2.44 years, 170.87±12.67 cm and 61.28±13.69 kg, respectively. Medical records of the participants for the 2016–2017 season were investigated retrospectively. FMS tests results conducted at the beginning of the season and MSIs encountered in the relevant season were recorded.Results: Inline lunge, active straight leg raises, and composite FMS scores were statistically different (0.05˃p) according to age groups. The composite FMS score increased with increasing age. The results revealed that no FMS test score can predict the rate of MSI that may occur during the season (p˃0.05).Conclusion: It has been observed that composite FMS score increases with age. It can be said that FMS test scores at the beginning of the season provides useful information in determining musculoskeletal system asymmetries and dysfunctions but it cannot be used to predict injuries that occur during the season in youth male soccer players. In addition, the study results indicated that the composite FMS score is not a factor that increases the time loss, but that asymmetries can be a factor that increases the time loss.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, S., DİNÇ, E. (2022). Relationship Between Functional Movement Screen Scores and Musculoskeletal Injuries in Youth Male Soccer Players: One-year Retrospective Observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 371–377. https://ajindex.com/articles/560559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Dvorak J, Junge A, Graf-Baumann T, Peterson L. Football is the most popular sport world wide. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:3S-4S. [CrossRef] 2. Arnason A, Sigurdsson SB, Gudmundsson A, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Risk factors for injuries in football. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:5–16. [CrossRef] 3. van Beijsterveldt AMC, Krist MR, Schmikli SL, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an injury prevention programme for adult male amateur soccer players: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Injury Prev 2011;17:e2. [CrossRef] 4. Le Gall F, Carling C, Reilly TA. Comparison of injury in professional and non-professional male graduate youth soccer players. In: Reilly T, Korkusuz F, editors. Science and football VI. The Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress on Science and Football 2007 Jan 15–20,
  2. Antalya, Turkey. London & NY: Routledge; 2009. p.100–104. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.472.1938&rep=rep1&type=pdf 5. Cook G. Movement: Functional movement systems: Screening, assessment, corrective strategies. USA: On Target Publications, 2010. 6. Cook G, Burton L. Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function -Part 1. North Am J Sports Phys Ther 2006;1:62. 7. Cook G, Burton L. Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function -Part 2. North Am J Sports Phys Ther 2006;1:132. 8. Kraus K, Schütz E, Taylor WR, Doyscher R. Efficacy of the functional movement screen: a review. J Strength Cond Res 2014;28:3571–3584. [CrossRef] 9. Smith PD, Hanlon MP. Assessing the effectiveness of the functional movement screen in predicting noncontact injury rates in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2017;31:3327–3332. [CrossRef] 10. Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen? North Am J Sports Phys Ther 2007;2:147. 11. Shimoura K, Nakayama Y, Tashiro Y, Hotta T, Suzuki Y, Tasaka S, Yokota Y. Association between functional movement screen scores and injuries in male college basketball players. J Sport Rehabil 2019;1:1–5. [CrossRef] 12. Tee JC, Klingbiel JF, Collins R, Lambert MI, Coopoo Y. Preseason Functional Movement Screen component tests predict severe contact injuries in professional rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res 2016;30:3194–3203. [CrossRef] 13. Newton F, McCall A, Ryan D, Blackburne C, aus der Fünten K, Meyer T, McCunn R. Functi