Journals / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Management and results of early-onset scoliosis with dual magnetically controlled growing rods: Additional preliminary results of spinal fusion surgery

Pages
478–488
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A significant increase in all subdomainscores of the EOSQ-24 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical andradiographic outcomes and complications of dual magneticallycontrolled growing rods (MCGRs) in the treatment of early-onsetscoliosis (EOS) and to investigate the results of patients withdefinitive spinal fusion following MCGR.Patients and methods: A total of 15 patients (7 males, 8 females;mean age: 8.7±1.7 years; range, 6 to 10 years) with EOS whounderwent dual MCGR and were prospectively followed betweenFebruary 2013 and March 2019 were included in this retrospectivestudy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, and the length of thespine between T1-T12 and T1-S1 were measured on preoperative,postoperative, and follow-up radiographs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A significant increase in all subdomainscores of the EOSQ-24 (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical andradiographic outcomes and complications of dual magneticallycontrolled growing rods (MCGRs) in the treatment of early-onsetscoliosis (EOS) and to investigate the results of patients withdefinitive spinal fusion following MCGR.Patients and methods: A total of 15 patients (7 males, 8 females;mean age: 8.7±1.7 years; range, 6 to 10 years) with EOS whounderwent dual MCGR and were prospectively followed betweenFebruary 2013 and March 2019 were included in this retrospectivestudy. The Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, and the length of thespine between T1-T12 and T1-S1 were measured on preoperative,postoperative, and follow-up radiographs. The 24-Item Early-OnsetScoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) was used to assess the functionaloutcomes before and after the operation. All complications duringthe treatment were recorded.Results: The mean follow-up was 27.8±10.4 (range, 12 to 60)months. The mean curve correction immediately after the indexsurgery and latest follow-up was 47.6% and 42.4%, respectively(p>0.05). At the last follow-up, there were no significant changesin mean Cobb and kyphosis angles. The mean T1-T12 lengthincrease was 26.2±7.1 (range, 16 to 40) mm, while the meanT1-S1 length increase was 43.3±15.0 (range, 24 to 70) mm.Complications developed in four (26.6%) of 15 patients. Definitivespinal fusion surgery was performed in seven patients. Totalmean Cobb angle difference between the final follow-up andfusion surgery was 9.3° (p=0.016) and kyphosis angle differencewas -2.1° (p=0.349). After fusion surgery, total lengthening inT1-T12 and T1-S1 distance was 10.5 mm (p=0.036) and 15.0 mm(p=0.022), respectively. A significant increase in all subdomainscores of the EOSQ-24 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

NABİ, V., TOKGÖZ, M. A., KILIÇASLAN, Ö. F., AKALIN, S., BÜTÜN, Ş. (2022). Management and results of early-onset scoliosis with dual magnetically controlled growing rods: Additional preliminary results of spinal fusion surgery. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 478–488. https://ajindex.com/articles/559250

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ, Akbarnia BA, Blakemore LC, Betz RR, et al. Development and initial validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2014;96:1359-67
  2. Skaggs D, Guillaume T, El-Hawary R, Emans J, Mendelow M, Smith JT. Early onset scoliosis consensus statement, SRS growing spine committee. Spine Deformity 2015;3:107
  3. Mayer O, Campbell R, Cahill P, Redding G. Thoracic insufficiency syndrome. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2016;46:72-97
  4. Karol LA, Johnston C, Mladenov K, Schochet P, Walters P, Browne RH. Pulmonary function following early thoracic fusion in non-neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90:1272-81
  5. Helenius IJ. Standard and magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:26
  6. Skaggs DL, Akbarnia BA, Flynn JM, Myung KS, Sponseller PD, Vitale MG; Chest Wall and Spine Deformity Study Group; Growing Spine Study Group; Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America; Scoliosis Research Society Growing Spine Study Committee. A classification of growth friendly spine implants. J Pediatr Orthop 2014;34:260-74
  7. Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH, Sponseller PD, Shah SA, El Sebaie H, et al. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: Analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010;92:2533-43
  8. Hickey BA, Towriss C, Baxter G, Yasso S, James S, Jones A, et al. Early experience of MAGEC magnetic growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2014;23 Suppl 1:S61-5
  9. Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM Jr, Salari P, Yaszay B, Pawelek JB. Innovation in growing rod technique: A study of safety and efficacy of a magnetically controlled growing rod in a porcine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1109-14
  10. Cheung KM, Cheung JP, Samartzis D, Mak KC, Wong YW, Cheung WY, et al. Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: A prospective case series. Lancet 2012;379:1967-74
  11. Dannawi Z, Altaf F, Harshavardhana NS, El Sebaie H, Noordeen H. Early results of a remotely-operated magnetic growth rod in early-onset scoliosis. Bone Joint J 2013;95- B:75-80
  12. Dimeglio A, Canavese F. The growing spine: How spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J 2012;21:64-70
  13. Dimeglio A, Canavese F. The immature spine: Growth and idiopathic scoliosis. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:22
  14. Cobb J. Outli