Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

SACRAL STRESS FRACTURES: AN IMAGING BASED CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Pages
237–241
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results suggest that physicians should be aware of sacral stress fractures in the setting of clinical suspicion, especially in the certain patient populations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background Data: Having been regarded as a rare cause of low back pain, sacral stress fractures are overestimated because of the lack of specific symptoms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Purpose: To present the incidence rate of sacral stress fractures by reviewing imaging modalities, and to compare the results of patient populations-at-risk in accordance with the current literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results suggest that physicians should be aware of sacral stress fractures in the setting of clinical suspicion, especially in the certain patient populations.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background Data: Having been regarded as a rare cause of low back pain, sacral stress fractures are overestimated because of the lack of specific symptoms. Furthermore, the level of awareness of this pathological condition is quite low amongst the physicians. Purpose: To present the incidence rate of sacral stress fractures by reviewing imaging modalities, and to compare the results of patient populations-at-risk in accordance with the current literature. Materials-Methods: This retrospective study was held at a private tertiary care center between April 2013 and December 2017. With the exception of high energy trauma patients, all individuals who had lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and those who further evaluated with a pelvic MRI scan consisted the study group. The patients’ demographics and the radiological features were evaluated and reviewed by using electronic patient records and hospital-based picture archiving and communication system. The frequencies were calculated and compared with the data obtained from the literature. Results: A total of 1321 individuals (female: 659, male: 662) had a lumbar MRI scan during the study period and 485 of them (female: 238, male: 247) were further analysed with a pelvic MRI scan for differential diagnosis. Fourteen of these patients were diagnosed as sacral stress fracture. The calculated frequencies within a 57 months period for females, males and the whole study population were 1.67 %, 0.45 % and 1.06 %, respectively. Conclusion: This study has reviewed the MRI studies and found out the incidence rates for sacral stress fractures. These results suggest that physicians should be aware of sacral stress fractures in the setting of clinical suspicion, especially in the certain patient populations.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYHAN, S., NABİYEV, V. N., YÖRÜBULUT, M., PALAOĞLU, S. (2018). SACRAL STRESS FRACTURES: AN IMAGING BASED CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 237–241. https://ajindex.com/articles/198565

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bakker G, Hattingen J, Stuetzer H, Isenberg J. Sacral Insufficiency Fractures: How to Classify? J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2018; 61: 258-266.
  2. Blake SP, Connors AM. Sacral insufficiency fracture. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: 891-896.
  3. Boden BP, Osbahr DC. High-risk stress fractures: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8: 344-353.
  4. Breuil V, Brocq O, Euller-Ziegler L, Grimaud A. In- sufficiency fracture of the sacrum revealing a pregnancy associated osteoporosis. First case report. Ann Rheum Dis 1997; 56: 278-279. Denay KL. Stress Fractures. Curr Sports Med Rep 2017; 16: 7-8.
  5. Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal I, Bencardino JT, Stone TJ, Roberts CC, Appel M, Baccei SJ, Cassidy RC, Chang EY, Fox MG, Greenspan BS, Gyftopoulos S, Hochman MG, Jacobson JA, Mintz DN, Mlady GW, Newman JS, Rosenberg ZS, Shah NA, Small KM, Weissman BN. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Stress (Fatigue/Insufficiency) Fracture, Including Sacrum, Excluding Other Vertebrae. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14: S293-S306. Harris CE, 3rd, Vincent HK, Vincent KR. Sacral Stress Fractures: They See You, But Are You Seeing Them? Curr Sports Med Rep 2016; 15: 73. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 2028-2037.
  6. Kim YY, Chung BM, Kim WT. Lumbar spine MRI ver- sus non-lumbar imaging modalities in the diagnosis of sacral insufficiency fracture: a retrospective observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19: 257. Kortman K, Ortiz O, Miller T, Brook A, Tutton S, Mathis J, Georgy B. Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteo- porotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions. J Neurointerv Surg 2013; 5: 461-466.
  7. Lin JT, Lane JM. Sacral stress fractures. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003; 12: 879-888.
  8. Longhino V, Bonora C, Sansone V. The management of sacral stress fractures: current concepts. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2011; 8: 19-23. Lourie H. Spontaneous osteoporotic fracture of the sa- crum. An unrecognized syndrome of the elderly. JAMA 1982; 248: 715-717.
  9. Lyders EM, Whitlow CT, Baker MD, Morris PP. Imag- ing and treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 201-210.
  10. Matcuk GR, Jr., Mahanty SR, Skalski MR, Patel DB, White EA, Gottsegen CJ. Stress fractures: patho- physiology, clinical presentation, imaging features, and treatment options. Emerg Radiol 2016; 23: 365-375. Mich