Journals / Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi / 2000 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 1

Problems faced in the applications of the point load index test

Nokta yükleme deneyi ile ilgili uygulamada karşılaşılan problemler

Pages
73–86
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, a linear relationship with high correlation coefficient between $sigma_c$ and $(IS_{(50)})$

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The point load index test is based on the principle that rock sample is broken between two conical platens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on the experience of the author, a proposal for including "D' " dimension of the rock, failure time, and textural and structural information of the failure surface of rock in the point load test form is given, k-value, defining the ratio between the uniaxial compressive strength $(ssigma_c)$ and the point load strength index $(IS_{(50)})$ , varies significantly for different rocks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, a linear relationship with high correlation coefficient between $sigma_c$ and $(IS_{(50)})$
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The point load index test is based on the principle that rock sample is broken between two conical platens. Failure load and specimen dimensions are used to calculate the point load strength index and this index is used in engineering geological studies. In this paper, the problems related to the point load testing device and the common mistakes of the users are discussed. Based on the experience of the author, a proposal for including "D' " dimension of the rock, failure time, and textural and structural information of the failure surface of rock in the point load test form is given, k-value, defining the ratio between the uniaxial compressive strength $(ssigma_c)$ and the point load strength index $(IS_{(50)})$ , varies significantly for different rocks. Therefore, k-values for different rocks should be assessed for engineering projects. In this study, a linear relationship with high correlation coefficient between $sigma_c$ and $(IS_{(50)})$

Özet

Nokta yükleme deneyi, iki konik uç arasına yerleştirilen kayaç örneğinin kırılması esasına dayanmaktadır. Yenilme yükü ve örnek boyutları kullanılarak bulunan nokta yükleme dayanım indeksi çeşitli amaçlarla mühendislik jeolojisi çalışmalarında kullanılmaktadır. Bu makalede, nokta yükleme deneyi ile ilgili uygulamada karşılaşılan aletsel ve kullanıcıyı ilgilendiren problemler tartışılmıştır. Yazarın uygulamada elde ettiği deneyimleri sonucu, standart deney formuna kayacın "D' " boyutu, kırılma zamanı ve yüzde olarak yenilme yüzeyindeki süreksizliğin ve kayaç dokusunun kontrolü hakkındaki bilgilerin eklenmesi önerilmiştir. Tek eksenli sıkışma dayanımı $sigma_c$ - nokta yükleme dayanım indeksi $(IS_{(50)})$ oranının (k) değişik kayaçlar için çok geniş bir aralıkta değişmesi nedeniyle, mühendislik projelerinde bu oran ayrıca belirlenmelidir. Bu çalışmada, tüfler için kullanılabilecek yüksek korelasyon katsayısı veren $sigma_c$ - $(IS_{(50)})$ ilişkisi sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, T. (2022). Problems faced in the applications of the point load index test. Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 1, 73–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/558462

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abbs, F.A., 1985. The use of the point load index in weak carbonate rocks, ASTM Special Technical Pub. 883 (R,.C, Chancy and K.R., Demarsi, Strength Testing of Marine Sediment, Laboratory and In-situ Measurements, 413-421pp. AI Jassar, S.H.,and Hawkins, A.B.,, 1979, Geotecfani- -. eal properties of the Carboniferous- limestone of the Bristol area-the influence of petrography and chemistry. 4th. Conferen- • - • ce on International Society.for Rock Mechanics,, Montreoux, -1, 3 -14pp. Anıl, M, Kılıç,, A., Kahraman, S,, Sandıkçı, M., ve Akyıldız, M., 1996. tscehisar (Afyon) mermerlerinin 'petrografik ve mekanik özellikleri. KTÜ Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü 30. Yıl Sempozyumu, Cilt 1, 436-447s, *,. Anon, 1972. The preparation of maps and plans in terms of engineering geology., Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology,,, 5,. 293- 382pp. Geological Engineering 24 (1) 2§&ê 84 Nokta yükleme deneyi Beawis, F.C., Roberts, F.L, and Minskaya,L.s, 1982. Engineering aspects of weatheriog 'of low grade metapelites in an arid climatic zone., Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 15, 29-45pp. Bell, F.G., 1992, Engineering properties of soils and rocks. Butterworth-Hein&nann, Oxford, 345 p., Bieniawski, Z.T.,.1975,. The point-load test in geotechnical practice. Engineering Geology, 9, M lpp. Bieniawski, Z.T., 1989. Engineering rock mass classifications. Wiley, New York, 264 p. Bowden,, A. J. Lamom-BLick. J., and Ulhutt S., 1998. P»uni load testing of weak rocks with particular reference to chalk. Quarterly Journal of Engineering ( ie» »1« >g. 11, 95-103pp. Broch, E., 1983. Estimation of strength.anisotropy using the point load test, International Journal of Rock Mechanics,, Mining Sciences and Geomechanical Abstracts, 20, 1.81.-187pp., Broch,. E., and Franklin, J.A., 1972. The point load strength test. International Journal of Rock, Mechanics.,, Mining Sciences and. Geomechanical Abstracts, 9, 669-697pp. Brook, ML, 1980. Size correction for point load testing (Technical Note). International Journal of Rock Mechanics, Mining Sciences and Geomechanical Abstracts, 17, 231- 235pp. Brook, N.,, 1985., The equivalent core diameter method of size and. shape correction In point load testing. International Journal of Rock Mechanics,,, Mining Sciences and Geomechanical Abstracts,, 22,, 61 -70pp. BSI, 1981. Code of practice for site investigations- BS 5930., British Standards Institution, 147 p. Cargill, IS,, and. Shakoor, A,., 1990., Evaluation, of empirical methods for