Journals / JAREM / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Pilonidal Sinus Repair Techniques: Phenol Application After Minimal Surgical Excision and Flap Repair

Pilonidal Sinüs Tedavisinde Minimal Cerrahi Eksizyon Sonrası Kristalize Fenol Uygulamasının Flep Tamiri ile Karşılaştırılması

Journal
JAREM
Pages
133–137
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter ingroup B (1.1 days) than in group A (3.7 days) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the results of pilonidal sinus repair techniques using crystallized phenol after a minimal excision and flap repair.Methods: Patients who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2014 at Health Sciences University Gaziosmanpaşa Taksim Training and ResearchHospital were enrolled in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients who underwent flap repairs with complete excision (group A; n=100) were compared with patientswho were treated with minimal excision and crystallized phenol (group B; n=100) in terms of demographic data, postoperative early complication,duration of hospitalization, wound healing time, return-to-work times, recurrence rates, and late complications.Results: In group A, 45 (45%) patients had a history of abscess, and 16 (16%) patients had recurrence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter ingroup B (1.1 days) than in group A (3.7 days) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare the results of pilonidal sinus repair techniques using crystallized phenol after a minimal excision and flap repair.Methods: Patients who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2014 at Health Sciences University Gaziosmanpaşa Taksim Training and ResearchHospital were enrolled in the study. Patients who underwent flap repairs with complete excision (group A; n=100) were compared with patientswho were treated with minimal excision and crystallized phenol (group B; n=100) in terms of demographic data, postoperative early complication,duration of hospitalization, wound healing time, return-to-work times, recurrence rates, and late complications.Results: In group A, 45 (45%) patients had a history of abscess, and 16 (16%) patients had recurrence. In group B, 35 (35%) patients had a history ofabscess, and 18 (18%) patients had recurrence. The mean time periods between the first symptom and presentation to the clinic were 6 and 7 months,respectively, and the median follow-up durations were 44 and 34 months, respectively. The mean duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter ingroup B (1.1 days) than in group A (3.7 days) (p

Özet

Amaç: Pilonidal sinüs tedavisinde, minimal cerrahi eksizyon sonrası uygulanan kristalize fenol ile geniş eksizyon sonrası uygulanan flep tamirleri ile sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. Yöntemler: Sağlık Bilimler Üniversitesi Gaziosmanpaşa Taksim Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, genel cerrahi kliniğinde 2008-2014 yıllar arasında ameliyat edilmiş olan hastaların kayıtları gözden geçirildi; pilonidal sinüs tedavi amacı ile geniş eksizyon sonrası oluşan defekt flep ile kapatılmış (grup A, no:100), minimal eksizyon sonrası kristalize fenol uygulanmış (grup B, no:100) demografik bilgiler, yatış süresi, erken ve geç komplikasyonlar, yara iyileşme süresi, işe başlama süresi ve nüks yönünden karşılaştırıldılar. Bulgular: Grup A’da 45 hasta (%45) apse öyküsü tarif etmiş, 16 hasta (%16) nüks vakadır. Grup B’de 35 hasta (%35) apse geçmişi tarif etmektedir, bu grupta 18 hasta (%18) nüks olarak kaydedilmişler. Semptomların başlangıcı ile hastaların başvuru arasında geçen süre ortalama olarak 6 ay ve 7 aydır, ortalama takip süreleri 44 ve 34 aydır. Hastane yatış süreleri, grup B grubunda (1,1 gün), grup A grubuna (3, 7 gün) göre daha kısadır (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ILGUN, A. S., ER, A. M., ÖNER, Z., KESKİN, M., GEDİK, M. L., GÖNÜLLÜ, D., KOKSOY, F. N. (2022). Comparison of Pilonidal Sinus Repair Techniques: Phenol Application After Minimal Surgical Excision and Flap Repair. JAREM, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 133–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/558235

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Kooristra HP. Pilonidal sinuses, Rewiev of literature and report of three hundred and fifty cases. Am J Surg 1942; 55: 3-17
  2. Conroy FJ, Kandamany N, Mahaffey PJ. Laser depilation and hygiene: preventing recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61: 1069-72. [CrossRef] 3. Bolandparvaz S, Moghadam Dizaj P, Salahi R, Paydar S, Bananzadeh M, Abbasi HR, et al. Evaluation of the risk factors of pilonidal sinus: A single center experience. Turk J Gastroenterol 2012; 23: 535-7. [CrossRef] 4. Cemalettin C. Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Definition,Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Outcome. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gen Surg- Special Topics 2018; 11: 85-7
  3. John J, Franckowiak, Raymond J. The etiology of pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon and Rectum 1962; 5: 2836
  4. Sondenaa K, Andersen E, Soreide JA. Morbidity and short term results in a randomised trial of open compared with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus. Eur J Surg 1992: 158: 351-5
  5. Gencosmanoglu R, Inceoglu R. Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Int J Colorect Dis 2005; 20: 415-22. [CrossRef] 8. Stauffer VK, Luedi MM, Kauf P, Schmid M, Diekmann M, Wieferich K, et al. Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus diesease: a meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurence. Sci Rep 2018: 8: 3058. [CrossRef] 9. Kronborg O, Christensen K, Zirmnermann-Nielsen C. Chronic pilonidal disease: a randomized trial with a complete 3 year follow-up. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 303-4. [CrossRef] 10. Steele SR, Perry WB, Mills S, Buie WD; Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for management of pilonidal disease. Dis Col Rectum 2013; 56: 1021-7. [CrossRef] 11. Hegge HG, Vos GA, Patka P, Hoitsma HF. Treatment of complicated or infected pilonidal sinüs disease by local application of phenol. Surgery 1987; 102: 52-4
  6. Humphries AE, Duncan JE. Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90: 113-24. [CrossRef] 13. Kayaalp C, Olmez A, Aydın C, Piskin T, Kahraman L. Investigation of one-time phenol application for pilonidal disease. Med Princ Pract 2010; 19: 212-5. [CrossRef] 14. Bayhan Z, Zeren S, Düzgün SA, Ucar BI, Alparslan Yumun HN, Mestan M. Crystallized phenol application and modified Limberg flap procedure in treatme