Journals / JAREM / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Clinical Outcomes Following Implantation of A New Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Yeni Asferik Monofokal Göz İçi Lensin İmplantasyonun Takiben Klinik Sonuçları

Journal
JAREM
Pages
35–40
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mean preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.81±0.30 LogMAR, and mean UDVA wasimproved to 0.17±0.15 LogMAR at 6 months follow-up (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aims to know if patients implanted with the OPTIFLEX Natural Yellow Hydrophilic Aspheric IOL (Moss Vision Inc.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ltd,London, UK) achieved the desired refractive outcome, with reduced reliance on spectacle correction and no significant decline in contrast orinducement/change in spherical aberrations.Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective study in patients with cataract.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mean preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.81±0.30 LogMAR, and mean UDVA wasimproved to 0.17±0.15 LogMAR at 6 months follow-up (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to know if patients implanted with the OPTIFLEX Natural Yellow Hydrophilic Aspheric IOL (Moss Vision Inc. Ltd,London, UK) achieved the desired refractive outcome, with reduced reliance on spectacle correction and no significant decline in contrast orinducement/change in spherical aberrations.Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective study in patients with cataract. Medical records of patients who were followed up for 6months were reviewed. Data on distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, refractive error (sphere, cylinder, and manifest spherical equivalent[MSE]), contrast sensitivity, and adverse events were collected and analyzed.Results: A total of 48 eyes of 48 patients, with mean age of 66.84±9.72 years (range, 43–88 years) and equal distribution of both genders, wereincluded in the present study. Mean preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.81±0.30 LogMAR, and mean UDVA wasimproved to 0.17±0.15 LogMAR at 6 months follow-up (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, aberasyon oluşturmayan “OPTIFLEX Natural Yellow Hydrophilic Aspheric IOL (Moss Vision Inc Ltd, London, UK)” implante edilen hastalarda arzu edilen refraktif sonuçlara ne ölçüde ulaşıldığını, gözlük kullanımına gereksinim miktarını, kontrast duyarlılıkta veya sferik aberasyonlarda değişiklik olup olmadığını değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: Çalışma, kataraktlı hastalarda yapılmış tek merkezli retrospektif bir çalışmadır. 6 aylık takip süresini tamamlayan hastaların kayıtları değerlendirildi. Uzak, orta ve yakın görme keskinliği, refraktif hata (sferik, silindirik ve sferik eşdeğer), kontrast duyarlılık ve yan etki verileri toplandı ve analiz edildi. Bulgular: 48 hastanın 48 gözünü kapsayan çalışmamızda ortalama yaş 66,84±9,72 (43-88 aralığında) ve cinsiyet bakımından kadın-erkek oranı eşitti. Ameliyat öncesi 0,81±0,30 LogMAR olarak saptanan ortalama düzeltilmemiş uzak görme keskinliği (UDVA); 6.ayda 0,17±0,15 LogMAR olarak bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, F. S., ONUR, İ. U., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, E., YİĞİT, U. (2022). Clinical Outcomes Following Implantation of A New Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens. JAREM, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 35–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/558222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Schuster AK, Tesarz J, Vossmerbaeumer U. The impact on vision of aspheric to spherical monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 2166-75.
  2. Kretz F, Tandogan T, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. High order aberration and straylight evaluation after cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric, aberration correcting monofocal intraocular lens. Int J Ophthalmol 2015; 8: 736-41.
  3. Sandoval HP, Fernández de Castro LE, Vroman DT, Solomon KD. Comparison of visual outcomes, photopic contrast sensitivity, wavefront analysis, and patient satisfaction following cataract extraction and IOL implantation: aspheric vs spherical acrylic lenses. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22: 1469-75.
  4. Denoyer A, Denoyer L, Halfon J, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ. Comparative study of aspheric intraocular lenses with negative spherical aberration or no aberration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 496-503.
  5. Trueb PR, Albach C, Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 890-5. Alió JL, Pi-ero DP, Ortiz D, Montalbán R. Clinical outcomes and postoperative intraocular 'optical quality with a microincision aberration-freeaspheric intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1548-54.
  6. Lee KM, Park SH, Joo CK. Comparison of clinical outcomes with three different aspheric intraocular lenses. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89: 40-6.
  7. Nochez Y, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ. Effect of interaction of macroaberrations and scattered light on objective quality of vision in pseudophakic eyes with aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 633-40.
  8. Tang Y, Song H, Chen J, Tang X. Comparison of pseudophakic retinal straylight in spherical/aspherical and hydrophobic/hydrophilic intraocular lens. Int J Ophthalmol 2015; 8: 1146-50.
  9. Kugelberg M, Wejde G, Jayaram H, Zetterström C. Two-year followup of posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic or hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. Acta Ophthalmol 2008; 86: 533-6.
  10. Cullin F, Busch T, Lundström M. Economic considerations related to choice of intraocular lens (IOL) and posterior capsule opacification frequency - a comparison of three different IOLs. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92: 179-83.
  11. Sharon Y, Livny E, Mimouni M, Weinberger D, Bahar I. Laser capsulotomy following cataract surgery: Comparing time to capsulotomy with implantation of two broadly used intraocular