Journals / JAREM / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Comparison and Analyses of Intraoperative Consultationand Paraffin Section Responses of Ovarian Lesions

Over Lezyonlarında İntraoperatif Konsültasyon Yanıtlarının ve Parafin Tanılarının Karşılaştırılması ve Değerlendirilmesi

Journal
JAREM
Pages
237–240
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The concordance between the methods was assessed with Kappa test and found as 94% (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) and the accuracy of frozen section (FS) method and compare the concordance of FS responses and paraffin section (PS) (final histopathological diagnoses) results of the ovarian mass operations in our hospital.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of ovarian lesions operated between March 2008 and June 2018 in which FS was requested.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In total 205 cases were found and the results were compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The concordance between the methods was assessed with Kappa test and found as 94% (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) and the accuracy of frozen section (FS) method and compare the concordance of FS responses and paraffin section (PS) (final histopathological diagnoses) results of the ovarian mass operations in our hospital.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of ovarian lesions operated between March 2008 and June 2018 in which FS was requested. In total 205 cases were found and the results were compared. The FS responses and PS results were classified as benign, borderline and malignant. Seventeen cases weren’t responded in FS (and left to be diagnosed in PS) and they were left out of the study.Results: According to the analyses; the sensitivity of benign, borderline and malignant tumors were 100%, 83%, 95%, and the specificity were 98%, 99%, 98%, respectively. The PPV of borderline and malignant tumors were 91%, 92% and the NPV were 98%, 99% respectively. Furthermore; both of their accuracy was 97%. The concordance between the methods was assessed with Kappa test and found as 94% (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada hastanemiz bünyesinde yapılan uterin adneksiyal kitle operasyonlarının intraoperatif konsültasyon yanıtları ve tanılarınıkarşılaştırmayı ve uyum ve uyumsuzluklarını değerlendirip, intraoperatif konsültasyonun benign, borderline ve malign ovaryan lezyonlardakiduyarlılığını, özgüllüğünü, pozitif-negatif prediktif değerlerini ve doğruluk oranlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Yöntemler: Hastanemizde Mart 2008 ve Haziran 2018 tarihleri arasında opere olan ve intraoperatif patoloji konsültasyonu yapılan uterin adneksiyalkitle olguları retrospektif olarak tarandı. Toplamda 205 olgu elde edildi ve sonuçlar karşılaştırıldı. Frozen yanıtları ve parafin tanıları; benign, borderlineve malign olarak gruplandı. Frozen esnasında yanıt verilmeyen, parafine bırakılan 17 olgu çalışmanın dışında bırakıldı. Bulgular: İstatistiksel analiz sonuçlarına göre benign, borderline ve malign tümörlerin intraoperatif konsültasyon sensitivitesi sırasıyla, %100, %83ve %95 olarak değerlendirilirken, spesifitesi de aynı sırayla %98, %99, %98 olarak değerlendirildi. Borderline ve malign tümörlerin pozitif prediktifdeğerleri ise %91 ve %92, negatif prediktif değerleri %98 ve %99 ve doğruluk oranı ise her ikisinin de %97 olarak değerlendirildi. Yöntemler arasındakiuyum Kappa testi ile değerlendirildi ve %94±0,03 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SALMAN, S., GÜNDOĞAN, Ö., KIMILOĞLU, E., YANIK, İ., BEKTAŞ, S. (2022). Comparison and Analyses of Intraoperative Consultationand Paraffin Section Responses of Ovarian Lesions. JAREM, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 237–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/558179

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RHE, editors. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. IARC: Lyon; 2014
  2. Sukumaran R, Somanathan T, Mathews A, Kattor J, Sambasivan S, Nair RP. Role of frozen section in intraoperative assessment of ovarian masses: a tertiary oncology center experience. Indian J Surg Oncol 2014; 5: 99-103
  3. Bige O, Demir A, Saygili U, Gode F, Uslu T, Koyuncuoglu M. Frozen section diagnoses of 578 ovarian tumors made by pathologists with and without expertise on gynecologic pathology. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 123: 43-6
  4. Açikalin A, Torun G, Bağir E, Bayram F, Zeren H, Güleç U, et al. Intraoperative frozen section in ovarian neoplasms; a tertiary center experience. Turk Patoloji Derg 2014; 30: 184-8
  5. Arshad NZ, Ng BK, Paiman NA, Abdullah Mahdy Z, Mohd Noor R. Intra-operative frozen sections for ovarian tumors - a tertiary center experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 19: 213-8
  6. Hashmi AA, Naz S, Edhi MM, Faridi N, Hussain SD, Mumtaz S, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for the evaluation of ovarian neoplasms: an institutional experience. World J Surg Oncol 2016; 14: 91
  7. Seong SJ, Kim DH, Kim MK, Song T. Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors. J Gynecol Oncol 2015; 26: 343-9
  8. Shih KK, Garg K, Soslow RA, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of ovarian borderline tumor. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 123: 517-21
  9. Tempfer CB, Polterauer S, Bentz EK, Reinthaller A, Hefler LA. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis in borderline tumors of the ovary: a retrospective analysis of 96 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 107: 248-52
  10. Takemoto S, Ushijima K, Kawano R, Fukui A, Terada A, Fujimoto T, et al. Validity of intraoperative diagnosis at laparoscopic surgery for ovarian tumors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 576-9.