Journals / JAREM / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The Risk Factors of Unplanned Hospital Readmission Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Perkütan Nefrolititomi Sonrası Hastaneye Planlanmamış Tekrar Başvurunun Risk Faktörleri

Journal
JAREM
Pages
69–74
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on multivariate analysis, the presence of Clavien 3a and 3b complications, post-operative blood transfusion, presence of preoperative hydronephrosis, American Society of Anaesthesiologist score and low stone density (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is currently recommended as the first treatment option for complex kidney stones larger than 2 cm.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Data of patients who were admitted to our clinic due to upper urinary system calculi and underwent conventional PNL operation between January 2015 and December 2019 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on multivariate analysis, the presence of Clavien 3a and 3b complications, post-operative blood transfusion, presence of preoperative hydronephrosis, American Society of Anaesthesiologist score and low stone density (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is currently recommended as the first treatment option for complex kidney stones larger than 2 cm. Although it is a safe and effective treatment, emergency room admissions and hospitalisations occur because of PNL complications. This study aimed to examine patient-related independent risk factors that may cause unplanned hospital readmission after PNL. Methods: Data of patients who were admitted to our clinic due to upper urinary system calculi and underwent conventional PNL operation between January 2015 and December 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Hospital readmission was defined as unscheduled rehospitalisation within 30 days after discharge. The study cohort was divided into two groups: the readmission (group A) and non-readmission groups (group B). Post-operative complication scoring was performed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate independent prognostic risk factors on readmission after PNL. Results: A total of 390 patients were included in our study. Of patients, 24 (6.1%) were readmitted to our clinic in the post-operative period. Gender, age, body mass index and stone volume were statistically similar between the groups. Based on multivariate analysis, the presence of Clavien 3a and 3b complications, post-operative blood transfusion, presence of preoperative hydronephrosis, American Society of Anaesthesiologist score and low stone density (

Özet

Amaç: Perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL), 2 cm’den büyük kompleks böbrek taşlarında günümüzde ilk tedavi seçeneği olarak önerilmektedir. Güvenli ve etkili bir tedavi olmasına rağmen, PNL komplikasyonları nedeniyle acil servis başvuruları ve hastaneye yatışlar gerçekleşebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, PNL sonrası hastaneye planlanmamış tekrar başvuruya neden olabilecek hastayla ilişkili bağımsız risk faktörlerini incelemeyi amaçladık. Yöntemler: Ocak 2015 ve Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında, kliniğimize üst üriner sistemde kalkül nedenli başvuran ve konvansiyonel PNL operasyonu uygulanan hastaların verileri retrospektif incelendi. Hastaların hastaneye tekrar başvurması, taburculuk sonrası 30 gün içerisinde planlanmamış yeniden hastaneye yatış olarak tanımlandı. Hastalar iki gruba ayrıldı: Hastaneye tekrar başvuran hastalar (grup A) ve tekrar başvurmayan hastalar (grup B). Operasyon sonrası komplikasyon skorlaması Clavien-Dindo sınıflamasına göre yapıldı. PNL sonrası yeniden kabulde bağımsız prognostik risk faktörlerini değerlendirmek için çok değişkenli lojistik regresyon analizi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Toplam 390 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Post-operatif dönemde hastaların 24’ü (%6,1) kliniğimize tekrar başvuruda bulundu. Cinsiyet, yaş, beden kitle indeksi ve taş hacminin, her iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak benzer olduğu görüldü. Çok değişkenli analize göre, Clavien 3a ve 3b komplikasyon varlığı, post-operatif kan transfüzyonu, preoperatif hidronefroz varlığı, Amerikan Anesteziyologlar Derneği skoru ve düşük taş dansitesi varlığının (

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞCI, A. İ., DANACIOĞLU, Y. O., ÖZLÜ, D. N., YENİCE, M. G., AKKAŞ, F. (2022). The Risk Factors of Unplanned Hospital Readmission Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. JAREM, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 69–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/558171

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Pradère B, Doizi S, Proietti S, Brachlow J, Traxer O. Evaluation of guidelines for surgical management of urolithiasis. J Urol 2018; 199: 1267-71
  2. Türk C, Petík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016; 69: 475-82
  3. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10: 257-9
  4. Kallidonis P, Panagopoulos V, Kyriazis I, Liatsikos E. Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: classification, management, and prevention. Curr Opin Urol 2016; 26: 88-94
  5. Basnet RB, Shrestha A, Shrestha PM, Joshi BR. Risk factors for postoperative complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2018; 16: 79-83
  6. Armitage JN, Withington J, van der Meulen J, Cromwell DA, Glass J, Finch WG, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database. BJU Int 2014; 113: 777-82
  7. Squires D, Anderson C. U.S. health care from a global perspective: spending, use of services, prices, and health in 13 countries. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2015; 15: 1-15
  8. Rambachan A, Matulewicz RS, Pilecki M, Kim JY, Kundu SD. Predictors of readmission following outpatient urological surgery. J Urol 2014; 192: 183-8
  9. Stone BV, Cohn MR, Donin NM, Schulster M, Wysock JS, Makarov DV, et al. Evaluation of unplanned hospital readmissions after major urologic inpatient surgery in the era of accountable care. Urology 2017; 109: 94- 100
  10. Keskin SK, Danacioglu YO, Turan T, Atis RG, Canakci C, Caskurlu T, et al. Reasons for early readmission after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2019; 14: 271-7
  11. Tepeler A, Karatag T, Tok A, Ozyuvali E, Buldu I, Kardas S, et al. Factors affecting hospital readmission and rehospitalization following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 2016; 34: 69-73. 12. de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 246-55
  12. Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y, et al. The most reliable preoperative assessment of renal stone burden as a predictor of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. Urology 2012; 80: 524-8
  13. Kumar M,