Journals / JAREM / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of the Causes for Repeated Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Early Period

Erken Dönemde Tekrarlayan Endoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiyopankreatografi Nedenlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Journal
JAREM
Pages
219–226
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: According to the results of this study, the diameter of the CBD and the number of stones increased in elderly patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the most important invasive endoscopic procedure for the clearance of bile duct stones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to determine the conditions in which the need for repeated ERCP increases in patients who have undergone ERCP for bile duct stones.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: According to the results of this study, the diameter of the CBD and the number of stones increased in elderly patients.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the most important invasive endoscopic procedure for the clearance of bile duct stones. Several factors may interfere with a positive outcome in the first attempt. It is important for the endoscopist and the patient to predict under which circumstances repeated intervention may be required. The aim of this study was to determine the conditions in which the need for repeated ERCP increases in patients who have undergone ERCP for bile duct stones. Methods: Data collected from the procedures performed by a single endoscopist between 2005 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The findings obtained from 100 cases whose bile duct stones were cleared in a single procedure were compared with those of 100 cases who required repeated ERCP in the early period. The demographic findings of the patients, laboratory examinations, difficulty of common bile duct (CBD) stones, clinical manifestation of cholangitis, anatomical and pathological conditions of the patients, factors that complicated the ERCP procedure, and consequently the effect of these factors on post-ERCP complications were investigated in both groups. Results: According to the results of this study, the diameter of the CBD and the number of stones increased in elderly patients. On the other hand, the presence of stenosis, enclaved stones in the CBD, and accompanying pancreatitis increased the need for repeated ERCP in young patients. In the prediction of single and repeated ERCP using the univariate model, a significant association (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı koledok taşı ön tanısıyla endoskopik retrograd kolanjiyopankreatografi (ERCP) işlemi yapılan hastalarda tekrarlayıcı ERCP gereksiniminin hangi durumlarda arttığının ortaya konmasıdır. Yöntemler: 2005-2020 yılları arasında tek cerrahi endoskopiste ait veriler retrospektif olarak irdelendi. Tek seansta safra kanalı taşları temizlenen 100 olguyla erken dönemde ERCP tekrarı gereken diğer 100 olguya ait bulgular karşılaştırıldı. Hastaların demografik bulguları, laboratuvar incelemeleri, koledok taşlarının zorluğu, kolanjit tabloları, hastalara ait anatomik ve patolojik durumlar, ERCP işlemini zorlaştıran faktörler ve sonuç olarak her iki grupta bu sonuçların post-ERCP komplikasyonlarına etkisi araştırıldı. Bulgular: ERCP ile safra kanalı taşlarının temizlenmesi en önemli invaziv endoskopik girişimdir. Bu işlemle bilindiği gibi birçok nedenden dolayı tek bir girişimde sonuç almak mümkün olmamaktadır. Bu durumun hangi durumlarda tekrar edilebileceğinin tahmin edilebilmesi endoskopist ve hastalar için önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre ileriki yaşlarda koledok çapı genişliği ve taş sayısı artmaktadır. Genç hastalarda ise dar koledok, anklave taşlar ve bu tabloya eşlik eden pankreatit durumlarında tekrarlayıcı ERCP olasılığının daha fazla olduğu görülmektedir. Her iki yaş grubunda bu tablolara eşlik eden kolanjit tablosunda stent koyma ihtiyacı daha fazladır. ERCP’de başarıyı tek bir faktör değil işlem zorluğunu artıran tüm klinik ve patolojik faktörler etkilemektedir. Sonuç: Klinik olarak kolanjitin eşlik ettiği durumlarda her iki yaş grubunda stentleme ihtiyacı daha yüksekti. ERCP’nin başarı oranı tek bir faktörden değil, işlemin zorluğunu artıran tüm klinik ve patolojik faktörlerden etkilenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAYDIN, M., DEMİRAY, O. (2022). Evaluation of the Causes for Repeated Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Early Period. JAREM, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 219–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/558160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ramirez FC, Dennert B, Sanowski RA. Success of repeat ERCP by the same endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 58-61
  2. Lu J, Cheng Y, Xiong XZ, Lin YX, Wu SJ, Cheng NS. Two- stage vs single -stage management for concominant gallstones and common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 8: 3156-66
  3. Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 28-33
  4. Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P, Prabhu M. A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1986-9
  5. Wu Y, Xu CJ, Xu SF. Advances in risk factors for recurrence of common bile duct stones. Int J Med Sci 2021; 18: 1067-74
  6. Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, Anderloni A, Arvanitakis M, Ah-Soune P, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 472-91
  7. Lujian P, Xianneng C, Lei Z. Risk factors of stone recurrence after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99: e20412
  8. Aranovich D, Zilbermints V, Goldberg N, Kaminsky O. Detection of common bile duct stones in mild acute biliary pancreatitis using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Surg Res Pract 2018; 2018: 5216089. doi: 10.1155/2018/5216089
  9. Molvar C, Glaenzer B. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation, treatment, and outcomes. Semin Intervent Radiol 2016; 33: 268-76
  10. Ramirez FC, Dennert B, Sanowski RA. Success of repeat ERCP by the same endoscopist Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 46: 58-61
  11. Vaira D, Ainsley C, Williams S, Cairns S, Salmon P, Russell C, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet 1989; 2: 431-4
  12. Deng F, Zhou M, Liu PP, Hong JB, Li GH, Zhou XJ, et al. Causes associated with recurrent choledocholithiasis following therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A large sample sized retrospective study. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7: 1028-37
  13. Stefanidis G, Christodoulou C, Manolakopoulos S, Chuttani R. Endoscopic extraction of large common bile duct stones: A review article. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 4: 167-79
  14. Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Parsi MA. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct Stone