Journals / JAREM / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Complications of Cervical Disc Prosthesis Dislocation: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Servikal Disk Protezi Dislokasyonunun Komplikasyonları: Retrospektif Bir Klinik Çalışma

Journal
JAREM
Pages
1–4
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Detailed information should be provided to the patient for whom cervical disc prosthesis is to be placed and prosthesis of the most appropriate size for disc space should be placed properly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The most commonly used method for the surgical treatment of cervical disc herniation (CDH) is anterior disc excision with Smith-Robinson’s approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Data of the patients who were operated due to the diagnosis of CDH in other centers and underwent revision surgery for the development of cervical prosthesis dislocation between 2013 and 2020 were collected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Detailed information should be provided to the patient for whom cervical disc prosthesis is to be placed and prosthesis of the most appropriate size for disc space should be placed properly.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The most commonly used method for the surgical treatment of cervical disc herniation (CDH) is anterior disc excision with Smith-Robinson’s approach. Following the excision of pathological disc space, disc prosthesis is placed if a continuation of dynamic movement in the disc space is desired and a cervical cage is placed for the purpose of fusion. Cervical disc prosthesis seems superior to cervical cage; however, it is not suitable for every patient and can cause serious complications. Our study include data of patients who developed complications following the dislocation of cervical prosthesis and who were referred to our clinic. The aim of our study is to emphasize that the cervical prosthesis is not suitable for every patient and may cause serious complications. Methods: Data of the patients who were operated due to the diagnosis of CDH in other centers and underwent revision surgery for the development of cervical prosthesis dislocation between 2013 and 2020 were collected. Results: This study analysed the data of four male and three female patients. The median value of patient ages was 42 (28-53). Neck pain and swallowing difficulty were the most common reasons for admission to the clinic. Dislocation was found to develop after trauma in three patients. Anterior and posterior dislocations were found to develop in five and two patients, respectively. Seven patients underwent revision surgery. All these patients were found to have dislocations at the C5-6 level. Conclusion: The prosthesis to be placed in the surgical treatment of CDH should be determined based on the patient. Detailed information should be provided to the patient for whom cervical disc prosthesis is to be placed and prosthesis of the most appropriate size for disc space should be placed properly.

Özet

Amaç: Smith-Robinson yaklaşımı ile anterior disk (SDH) eksizyonu, servikal disk herniasyonunun (SDH) cerrahi tedavisinde en sık kullanılan yöntemdir. Patolojik disk boşluğunun eksizyonunu takiben disk aralığında dinamik hareketin devam etmesi isteniyorsa disk protezi, füzyon için servikal kafes yerleştirilir. Servikal disk protezi, servikal kafesten daha üstün görünmektedir; ancak her hasta için uygun değildir ve ciddi komplikasyonlara neden olabilir. Yöntemler: 2013-2020 yılları arasında SDH tanısıyla diğer merkezlerde ameliyat edilen ve servikal protez dislokasyonu nedeniyle revizyon ameliyatı geçiren hastaların verileri toplandı. Bulgular: Çalışmada dört erkek ve üç kadın hastanın verileri analiz edildi. Ortanca değer 42 (28-53) idi. Boyun ağrısı ve yutma güçlüğü kliniğe başvuru için en sık nedenlerdi. Üç hastada travma sonrası dislokasyon geliştiği saptandı. Sırasıyla beş hastada ve iki hastada ön ve arka dislokasyon geliştiği saptandı. Yedi hastaya revizyon ameliyatı yapıldı. Bu hastaların tümünün C5-6 seviyesinde dislokasyon olduğu bulundu. Sonuç: Boyun fıtıklarının cerrahi tedavisinde yerleştirilecek protez hastaya göre belirlenmelidir. Boyun diski protezi yerleştirilmesine karar verilen hastaya detaylı bilgi verilmeli, disk boşluğuna en uygun büyüklükte protez uygun şekilde yerleştirilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGER, Ö., KAPLAN, N., AKYUVA, Y., URFALI, B., AYKUT, A. M. (2022). Complications of Cervical Disc Prosthesis Dislocation: A Retrospective Clinical Study. JAREM, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 1–4. https://ajindex.com/articles/558146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Kaplan N, Akyuva Y, Güven G, Kabatas S, Murat Taskin M. Radiological and clinical comparison of the results of patients with fusion and unfusion cervical anterior microdiscectomy with the help of cases and literature. J Acad Res Med 2020; 10: 48-56
  2. Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 2047-51
  3. Chong E, Pelletier MH, Mobbs RJ, Walsh WR. The design evolution of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 99
  4. Traynelis VC. The Prestige cervical disc replacement. Spine J 2004; 4(Suppl 6): S310-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.025
  5. Duggal N, Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Keller JL. Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 17: E9. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.9
  6. Yalcin MB, Gokce A, Gokay NS. The Indications for Cervical Disc Prosthesis. J Turk Spinal Surg 2010; 21: 273-8
  7. Brooke NS, Rorke AW, King AT, Gullan RW. Preliminary experience of carbon fibre cage prostheses for treatment of cervical spine disorders. Br J Neurosurg 1997; 11: 221-7
  8. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Kim SW, Cappuccino A, et al. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: S176-85. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092219.28382.0C
  9. Wagner SC, Kang DG, Helgeson MD. Traumatic migration of the bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Global Spine J 2016; 6: e15-20. doi: 10.1055/s0035-1550092
  10. Yang CC, Tang CL, Tzeng CY, Tsou HK. Metallosis after traumatic loosening of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review. Eur Spine J 2018; 27: 415-20
  11. Niu T, Hoffman H, Lu DC. Cervical artificial disc extrusion after a paragliding accident. Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8: 138
  12. Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, Barsa P, Sourkova P, Hradil J, et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 2802-6