Journals / İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Management of Gallbladder Polyps: A Tertiary Center Experience

Safra Kesesi Poliplerinin Yönetimi: Bir Üçüncü Basamak Deneyimi

Pages
129–133
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The characteristics of symptomsand their response to cholecystectomy should be evaluated in symptomatic cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The main purpose of the management of gallbladder polyps is to establish an early diagnosis and toprevent the development of gallbladder cancer.Methods: Fifty-six patients who underwent cholecystectomy with the diagnosis of gallbladder polyp betweenJanuary 2012 and September 2018, were retrospectively evaluated.Results: Twenty-one patients (39.3%) were female and 34 (60.7%) were male.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The indications for cholecystectomywere ≥ 10 mm polyps in (n=22, 39.3%), increase in polyp size during follow-up (n=8, 14.3%), symptomatic polypssmaller than 10 mm (n=24, 42.9%), polyps smaller than 10 mm with concomitant risk factors (n=2, 3.6%).Histopathological examination of gallbladders revealed the presence of cholesterol polyps in 51 (91.1%), inflammatory polyps in 1 (1.8%), and adenoma in 1 (1.8%) patient.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The characteristics of symptomsand their response to cholecystectomy should be evaluated in symptomatic cases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The main purpose of the management of gallbladder polyps is to establish an early diagnosis and toprevent the development of gallbladder cancer.Methods: Fifty-six patients who underwent cholecystectomy with the diagnosis of gallbladder polyp betweenJanuary 2012 and September 2018, were retrospectively evaluated.Results: Twenty-one patients (39.3%) were female and 34 (60.7%) were male. The indications for cholecystectomywere ≥ 10 mm polyps in (n=22, 39.3%), increase in polyp size during follow-up (n=8, 14.3%), symptomatic polypssmaller than 10 mm (n=24, 42.9%), polyps smaller than 10 mm with concomitant risk factors (n=2, 3.6%).Histopathological examination of gallbladders revealed the presence of cholesterol polyps in 51 (91.1%), inflammatory polyps in 1 (1.8%), and adenoma in 1 (1.8%) patient. Three patients (5.4%) had no polyps and only gallstoneswere detected. Malignancy was not detected in any patient.Conclusion: The management of gallbladder polyps is still a controversial issue. The recommendations publishedin guidelines, can be used as a guide in the management of gallbladder polyps. The characteristics of symptomsand their response to cholecystectomy should be evaluated in symptomatic cases.

Özet

Amaç: Safra kesesi poliplerinin yönetiminde temel amaç safra kesesi kanseri gelişiminin önüne geçmek ya da erken tanı koymaktır. Yöntem: Ocak 2012 - Eylül 2018 tarihleri arasında safra kesesi polibi tanısıyla kolesistektomi uygulanan 56 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastaların 22’si erkek (%39,3), 34’ü kadındı (%60,7). Hastaların 22’si (%39,3) 10 mm ve üzeri polip boyutu, 8’i (%14,3) takipte boyut artışı, 24’ü (%42,9) 10 mm’den küçük polip boyutu ancak semptomatik, 2’si (%3,6) 10 mm’den küçük ancak beraberinde risk faktörleri olması endikasyonları ile opere edildi. Elli bir hastada (%91,1) kolesterol polibi, 1 hastada (%1,8) inflamatuvar polip, 1 hastada (%1,8) adenom saptandı. Hastalardan 3’ünde (%5,4) safra kesesi histopatolojik incelemesinde polibe rastlanmamış olup, yalnızca taş saptanmıştır. Hiçbir hastada malignite saptanmamıştır. Sonuç: Safra kesesi poliplerinin tedavi ve yönetimi halen tartışmalı bir konudur. Yayınlanan kılavuzlardaki öneriler, safra kesesi polip yönetiminde rehber olarak kullanılabilir. Semptomatik olgularda semptomlarn karakteristiği ve kolesistektomiye yanıtı iyi değerlendirilmelidir

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, A. C., AYDIN, C., ÜSTÜN, M. (2022). Management of Gallbladder Polyps: A Tertiary Center Experience. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 129–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/558104

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Cha BH, Hwang JH, Lee SH et al. Pre-operative factors that can predict neoplastic polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(17):2216-22.
  2. Elmasry M, Lindop D, Dunne DF, Malik H, Poston GJ, Fenwick SW. The risk of malignancy in ultrasound detected gallbladder polyps: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2016;33:28-35. Andrén-Sandberg A. Diagnosis and management of gallbladder polyps. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(5):203-11.
  3. Park JK, Yoon YB, Kim YT et al. Management strategies for gallbladder polyps: is it possible to predict malignant gallbladder polyps? Gut Liver. 2008;2(2):88-94.
  4. Vila M, Lladó L, Ramos E. Management and treatment of gallbladder polyps. Med Clin (Barc). 2018;150(12):487-91.
  5. Lee SR, Kim HO, Shin JH. Reasonable cholecystectomy of gallbladder polyp - 10 years of experience. Asian J Surg. 2019;42(1):332-37.
  6. Bhatt NR, Gillis A, Smoothey CO, Awan FN, Ridgway PF. Evidence based management of polyps of the gall bladder: A systematic review of the risk factors of malignancy. Surgeon. 2016;14(5):278-86.
  7. Mori Y, Sato N, Matayoshi N et al. Rare combination of familial adenomatous polyposis and gallbladder polyps. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(46):17661-5.
  8. Wiles R, Thoeni RF, Barbu ST et al. Management and followup of gallbladder polyps: Joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery - European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Eur Radiol. 2017;27(9):3856-66.