SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

Risk Factors Predicting Urinary Tract Infection Following Semirigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy

Semirijit Üreteroskopik Litotripsi Sonrası Gelişen İdrar Yolu Enfeksiyonunu Öngören Risk Faktörleri

Özgür KAZAN
Mehmet Çağlar ÇAKICI
Ayberk İPLİKÇİ
Gökhan ATIŞ
Asıf YILDRIM
Özgür EFİLOĞLU
Muhammet ÇİÇEK
Pages
294–301
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Numbers and size of the stones were also higher in the postoperative infective group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and predictive factors of postoperative UTI in patients who underwent URS because of ureteral stones.Method: Data from 425 patients undergoing semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy between December 2015 and December 2019 at a single center were reviewed to detect factors predicting postoperative urinary tract infections.Results: Of the 425 patients, 35 were infective (8.2%).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Proximal ureteral stones were the majority in the infective group (48.5%), and distal ureteral stones were the majority in the non-infective group (42.6%) (p=0.026).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Numbers and size of the stones were also higher in the postoperative infective group (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and predictive factors of postoperative UTI in patients who underwent URS because of ureteral stones.Method: Data from 425 patients undergoing semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy between December 2015 and December 2019 at a single center were reviewed to detect factors predicting postoperative urinary tract infections.Results: Of the 425 patients, 35 were infective (8.2%). Proximal ureteral stones were the majority in the infective group (48.5%), and distal ureteral stones were the majority in the non-infective group (42.6%) (p=0.026). Numbers and size of the stones were also higher in the postoperative infective group (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı üreter taşları nedeniyle URS uygulanan hastalardaki postoperatif İYE gelişme sıklığını ve prediktif faktörlerini belirlemektir. Yöntem: Lokal etik kurul onayı alındıktan sonra Aralık 2015-Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında merkezimizde semirijit üreteroskopik litotripsi uygulanan 425 hastanın verileri, postoperatif idrar yolu enfeksiyonunu öngörebilecek faktörleri saptamak için gözden geçirildi. Bulgular: 425 hastanın 35’i enfektifti (%8,2). Enfeksiyöz grupta proksimal üreter taşları çoğunlukta idi (%48,5); distal üreter taşları enfektif olmayan grupta çoğunluktu (%42.6) (p=0,026). Postoperatif enfektif grupta taş sayısı ve taş boyutu da yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAZAN, Ö., ÇAKICI, M. Ç., İPLİKÇİ, A., ATIŞ, G., YILDRIM, A., EFİLOĞLU, Ö., ÇİÇEK, M. (2022). Risk Factors Predicting Urinary Tract Infection Following Semirigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 294–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/558079

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Isen K. Single-session ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for the management of bilateral ureteric stones. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38(1):63-8. [CrossRef] 2. Cui X, Ji F, Yan H, Ou TW, Jia CS, He XZ, et al. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis. Urology. 2015;85(4):748-56. [CrossRef] 3. Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1190-6. [CrossRef] 4. Cindolo L, Castellan P, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Celia A, Paccaduscio A, Schips L, Proietti S, Breda A, Giusti G. Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol. 2016;34(3):305-10. [CrossRef] 5. Volkin D, Shah O. Complications of ureteroscopy for stone disease. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2016;68(6):570-85, PMID:27441595. 6. Moses RA, Ghali FM, Pais VM, Jr., Hyams ES. Unplanned Hospital Return for Infection following Ureteroscopy-Can We Identify Modifiable Risk Factors? J Urol. 2016;195(4 Pt 1):931-6. [CrossRef] 7. Dahm P, Roger Dmochowski. Evidence-based Urology: BMJ Books London; 2010. 50 p. [CrossRef] 8. Bootsma AM, Laguna Pes MP, Geerlings SE, Goossens A. Antibiotic prophylaxis in urologic procedures: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1270-86. [CrossRef] 9. Lo CW, Yang SS, Hsieh CH, Chang SJ. Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics against Post-Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015;16(4):415-20. [CrossRef] 10. Mrkobrada M, Ying I, Mokrycke S, Dresser G, Elsayed S, Bathini V, et al. CUA Guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for urologic procedures. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(1-2):13-22. [CrossRef] 11. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007;52(6):1610-31. [CrossRef] 12. Perez Castro E, Osther PJ, Jinga V, Razvi H, Stravodimos KG, Parikh K, et al. Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol. 2014;66(1):102-9. [CrossRef] 13. Kim JW, Lee YJ, Chung JW, Ha YS, Lee JN, Yoo ES, et al. Clinical characteristics of postoperative febrile urinary tract infections after ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Investig Clin Urol. 2018;59:335-41. [CrossRef] 14