Journals / İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of the Pregnancy Characteristics andOutcomes Between Syrian Immigrants and Local TurkishWomen: Large Cohort Multicenter Study

Suriyeli Mülteciler ve Yerel Türk Vatandaşları Arasındaki Gebelik Özellikleri ve Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması: Çok Merkezli Geniş Kohort Çalışma

Pages
181–186
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We compared 11036 Syrian immigrants and local Turkish women in terms of their demographic features, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes.Results: Pregnant women were significantly younger, and the number of adolescent pregnancies (maternal age

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present study is to compare Syrian immigrants and local Turkish women in terms of pregnancy characteristics and its outcomes.Methods: In a large cohort, multicenter, retrospective study, we obtained data from births that occurred in three hospitals in the Metropolitan Municipality of Izmir and Aydin Province between October 1, 2009 and June 1, 2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: The aim of the present study is to compare Syrian immigrants and local Turkish women in terms of pregnancy characteristics and its outcomes.Methods: In a large cohort, multicenter, retrospective study, we obtained data from births that occurred in three hospitals in the Metropolitan Municipality of Izmir and Aydin Province between October 1, 2009 and June 1, 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We compared 11036 Syrian immigrants and local Turkish women in terms of their demographic features, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes.Results: Pregnant women were significantly younger, and the number of adolescent pregnancies (maternal age
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study is to compare Syrian immigrants and local Turkish women in terms of pregnancy characteristics and its outcomes.Methods: In a large cohort, multicenter, retrospective study, we obtained data from births that occurred in three hospitals in the Metropolitan Municipality of Izmir and Aydin Province between October 1, 2009 and June 1, 2019. We compared 11036 Syrian immigrants and local Turkish women in terms of their demographic features, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes.Results: Pregnant women were significantly younger, and the number of adolescent pregnancies (maternal age

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de bulunan Suriyeli mülteciler ile Türk vatandaşlarının gebeliklerine ait özelliklerve gebelik sonuçlarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntem: Bu geniş kohortlu, çok merkezli, retrospektif çalışmada 1 Ocak 2009 ve 1 Haziran 2019 tarihleri arasındaAydın ve İzmir illerinde bulunan üç hastaneden elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada 11036 Suriyeli mül teci ve 141442 Türk vatandaşına ait demografik veriler, obstetrik öykü, obstetrik ve neonatal sonuçlar kıyaslandı. Bulgular: Türk vatandaşlarına kıyasla Suriyeli mülteci gebeler daha gençti ve Suriyeli grupta adölesan gebelikler(anne yaşı

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLEÇ, E. Ş., KURTULMUŞ, S. K., GÜR, E. B. (2022). Comparison of the Pregnancy Characteristics andOutcomes Between Syrian Immigrants and Local TurkishWomen: Large Cohort Multicenter Study. İzmir Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 181–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/558048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. United Nations Refugee Agency. Inter-agency Information Sharing Portal. 2016; Apr
  2. Turkish Ministry of İnterior General Directorate of İmmigration, migration statistics, temporaray protection 2019;Sep
  3. Alnuaimi K, Kassab M, Ali R, Mohammad K, Shattnawi K. Pregnancy outcomes among Syrian refugee and Jordanian women: a comparative study. Int Nurs Rev. 2017;64:584-92. [CrossRef] 4. Murray C, King G, Lopez AD, Tomijimia N, Krug EG. Armed conflict as a public health problem. BMJ. 2002;324:346-9. [CrossRef] 5. Abu Hamad Kh, Abed Y, Abu Hamad B. Risk factors associated with preterm birth in the Gaza Strip: hospital-based case control study. East Mediterr Health J. 2007;13:1132-41. [CrossRef] 6. Reese Masterson A, Usta J, Gupta J, Ettinger AS. Assessment of reproductive health and violence against women among displaced Syrians in Lebanon. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:25. [CrossRef] 7. Kandasamy T, Cherniak R, Shah R, Yudin MH, Spitzer R. Obstetric Risks and Outcomes of Refugee Women at a Single Centre in Toronto. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:296-302. [CrossRef] 8. Büyüktiryaki M, Canpolat FE, Alyamac Dizdar E¸ Okur N, Kadıoğlu Şimşek G. Neonatal outcomes of Syrian refugees delivered in a tertiary hospital in Ankara, Turkey. Confl Health. 2015;9:38. [CrossRef] 9. Erenel H, Aydogan Mathyk B, Sal V, Ayhan I, Karatas S, Koc Bebek A. Clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of Syrian refugees: a case-control study in a tertiary care hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(1):45-50. [CrossRef] 10. Demirci H, Yildirim Topak N, Ocakoglu G, Karakulak Gömleksiz M, Ustunyurt E, Ulku Turker A. Birth characteristics of Syrian refugees and Turkish citizens in Turkey in 2015. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;137(1):63-6. [CrossRef] 11. Güngör ES, Seval O, İlhan G, Verit FF. Do Syrian refugees have increased risk for worser pregnancy outcomes? Results of a tertiary center in İstanbul. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;15(1):23-7. [CrossRef] 12. Ozel S, Yaman S, Kansu Celik H, Hancerliogullari N, Balci N, Engin Ustun Y. Obstetric Outcomes among Syrian Refugees: A Comparative Study at a Tertiary Care Maternity Hospital in Turkey. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(11):673-9. [CrossRef] 13. Turkay U, Aydın U, Calıskan E, Salıcı M, Terzi H, Astepe B. Comparison of the pregnancy results between adolescent Syrian refugees and local adolescentTurkish citizens who gave birth in our clinic. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;25:1-6. [CrossRef] 14. Ganchimeg T, Ota E,