Objective & Hypothesis:Vancomycin and teicoplanin minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 42 Enterococus strains isolated from clinical specimens were evaluated by using macrodilution methods and E-Test according to NCCLS recommendation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In İzmir Atatürk Teaching Hospital Clinical Microbiyology Laboratory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The MIC values were between
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Vancomycin and teicoplanin minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 42 Enterococus strains isolated from clinical specimens were evaluated by using macrodilution methods and E-Test according to NCCLS recommendation. In İzmir Atatürk Teaching Hospital Clinical Microbiyology Laboratory. The MIC values were between
Özet
İzmir Atatürk Eğitim Hastanesi Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Laborotuvarına gelen klinik örneklerden izole edilen 42 Enterekok suşunun tanımlamaları yapılarak, NCCLS’in önerileri doğrultusunda, makrodilüsyon ve E-Test yöntemleriyle glikopeptit antibiyotiklerden vancomycin ve teicoplanin için minimal inhibitör konsantrasyon (MİK) değerleri araştırılmıştır. Bütün suşlar bu antibiyotiklere duyarlı ve MİK değerleri
🔖
Cite This Article
KURULTAY, N., YURTSEVER, G. S., BARAN, N., OĞUZ, R., AFŞAR, İ., ŞENER, A. G. (2022). Comparison of macrodilution and E-test methods for glikopeptides antibiotic of nosocomial enterecocci. İzmir Atatürk Eğitim Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 31–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/557533
LeCleg R., Ederlot E., Duvel J., Courveli P.: Plazmid mediated resistance to vanvomycin and teicoplanin in E. faecium. N.Eng J. Med. 1998: 319;157
UttleyAHC, CollinsVH, George R. C.: Vancomycin resistant enterococci. Lancet, 1998: 1;57, 1 4. Hoşgör M., Ulusay S., Özinel M., Tunger A., Topbaş A.: Aminoglikozidlere yüksek düzeyde direnç gösteren enterokokların değişik antibiyotiklere duyarlılıklarının araştırılması. İnfeksiyon Dergisi, 1994: 8 (3-4); 115-117
Fuller SA, Low DE, Simon AE: Evaluation of a commercial microtiter system, using both frozen and freeze-dried panels for detection of high-level amynogycoside resistance in enteroccus. Spp J. Clin. Microbiol, 1990: 28; 1051-3
Nicolau DP, Marangos MN, Nightingale CH, Patel KB: Efficacy of vancomycin and teicoplanin alone and in combination with streptomycin in experimentel, low-level vancomycin-resistant, VAN B-type Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1996 Jan, 40:1, 55-60
Athanassios T, Woodford N, Pournaras S, Kaufman M: Apparent increased prevalence of high-level aminoglikoside-resistant E. durans. Resulting from false identification by a semiautomated softyware sstem. J Clin Microbio. May 1998: 1419-1421
Kocagöz S., Çetinkaya Y., Uzun Ö., Akova M., Hasçelik G., Ünal S.: Hastane infeksiyonlarından izole edilmiş stafilokok ve enterokok suşlarının çeşitli antibiyotiklere duyarlılıkları. Flora 1997: 4; 284-287
Endtz H.P., Braak N., Belkum A., Goessens W.H., Kreft D, Strobel B: Comparison of eight methods to detect vancomycin resistance in Enterococci. J. Clin Microbiol, 10 1998: 592-594
Fridkin S., Yokoe D., Whitney C., Onderdon K.A.: Epidemiology of a dominant clonal strain of vancomycin resistant E. Faecium at separate hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, J. Clin Microbiol. 1998: 965-970
Bonaventura D.G., Ricci E., Loggia N.D., Catamo G, Piccolomini R: valuation of the E-Test for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of P. aeruginosa isolates from patients with long-term bladder catheterization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 12 1998: 824-826