Journals / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of E-Mentorship Process on Mentee Achievement

E-Mentorluk Sürecinin Mente Başarısına Etkisi

Pages
170–186
Publication Date
2013-06-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the results of the analyses, we found that ementorship implementation had positive impact on the success of provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With this study, we aim to determine the contributions of e-mentorship model on the sustainability of provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carried out in 2011-2012 years by the participation of 59 provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors who were on duty in provinces of Elazig, Malatya, and Bingol.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the results of the analyses, we found that ementorship implementation had positive impact on the success of provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2011-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:E-mentor · e-mentorluk · mente

Abstract

With this study, we aim to determine the contributions of e-mentorship model on the sustainability of provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors. First of all, we have designed and published a web-site (www.e-mentorum.com) to carry out all activities. Based on both literature review and the demands of prospective system users at the beginning phase of the implementation, we have determined eight learning content packages and designed appropriate instructional materials and then uploaded them to the web site. We defined three distinct user-groups called as admin, e-mentor, and mentee. This study was carried out in 2011-2012 years by the participation of 59 provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors who were on duty in provinces of Elazig, Malatya, and Bingol. In this study, academicians and experienced provincial education supervisors i were assigned as e-mentor, other provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors were assigned as mente while researcher was admin. Before the implementation of this study, which one group pretest-posttest design model was adopted, for this study and we run an orientation program on what kinds of activities would take place during the implementation and how they would be achieved. Achievement test was used to determine the effect of e-mentorship implementation on the success of provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors as pretest at the beginning of the implementation and as posttest at the end of the implementation (after 10 weeks). For the analyses of the data, paired-sample t-test, Kruskal Wallis H-test, and Mann Whitney U test were used. Based on the results of the analyses, we found that ementorship implementation had positive impact on the success of provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors.

Özet

Bu araştırma ile il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarının mesleki gelişimlerini sürdürmelerinde ementorluk modelinin sürece olan katkılarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Öncelikle tüm etkinliklerin gerçekleştirildiği uygulama sitesi (www.e-mentorum.com) hazırlanarak yayınlanmıştır. Literatür taraması ve uygulama başlangıcında uygulama sitesi kullanıcılarından gelen istekler doğrultusunda belirlenen sekiz öğrenme içeriği ile ilgili öğrenme materyalleri hazırlanarak uygulama sitesine yüklenmiştir. Uygulama sitesinde yönetici, ementor ve mente olarak üç farklı kullanıcı grubu tanımlanmıştır. 2011-2012 yılında, Elazığ, Malatya ve Bingöl illerinde görevli il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarından 59’unun katılımıyla gerçekleştirilen araştırmada akademisyen ve deneyimli il eğitim denetmenleri e-mentor, çalışma grubunda yer alan diğer il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcıları mente, araştırmacı ise yönetici olarak atanmıştır. Tek grup öntest sontest deneysel desende gerçekleştirilen araştırmada uygulama sitesi üzerinden yapılacak etkinliklerin neler olduğu ve nasıl yapılacağı hakkında oryantasyon eğitimleri verilmiştir. E-mentorluk uygulamasının, il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarının başarılarına etkisini belirlemek için başarı testi kullanılmıştır. Sonraki aşamada başarı testi öntesti yapılarak uygulamaya başlanmıştır. 10 hafta süren araştırma sonunda başarı testi sontestleri uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda elde verilerin analizi aşamasında ilişkili örneklemler t testi, Kruskal Wallis H testi ve Mann Whitney U testi kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizi ile e-mentorluk uygulamasının, il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarının başarılarına olumlu katkı sağladığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, D. T. Y., ÖZAN, D. D. M. B. (2013). The Effects of E-Mentorship Process on Mentee Achievement. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 170–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/55711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Anderson, E. M. & Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42.
  2. Asgari, M. & O’Neill, K. (2004). What do they mean by ‘success’? Contributors to perceived success in a telementoring program for adolescents, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April. Bean, R. M. & Swan, A. L. (2002, December). Evaluating the success of a professional development initiative: Satisfaction is not enough! Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL. Bierema, L. L. & Merriam, S. (2002). E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 211-227.
  3. Brescia W.F. (2002). Using a Telementoring Taxonomy in a World Wide Web Instructional Environment: A Case Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington. Burgstahler, S. & Cronheim, D. (2001). Supporting peer–peer and mentor–protégé relationships on the Internet. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 59–74.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2001).Deneysel Desenler. Pegema Yayıncılık. Ankara.
  5. Folsom, A. C. (1995). The contributions of locus of control to the effect of mentoring tactics in computer-based instruction on college students’ achievement. Doctoral Dissertation. DAI, 56-12A: 4734. Griffiths, M., Miller, H. (2005). E-mentoring: Does it have a place in medicine? Postgraduate Mededical Journal; 81: 389–390.
  6. Harris, J., O’Bryan, E. & Rotenberg, L. (1996). It’s a simple idea, but it’s not easy to do: Practical lessons in telementoring. Learning and Leading With Technology 24(2): 53–57.
  7. Hasselbring, T. S. & Williams Glaser, C. H. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. The Future of Children – Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 102–122.
  8. Hezlett S. A., Gibson S. (2005). Mentoring and human resource development: where we are and where we need to go. Advances in Developing Human Resources 7(2):446–469. doi:10.1177/1523422305279667. Hubschman, B. G. (1996). The effect of mentoring electronic mail on student achievement and attitudes in a graduate course in educational research. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57-08A:3417. Klasen, N. & Clutterbuck, D. (2005). Implementing Mentoring Schemes A Proctical Guide to Successful Programs, Butterworth-Heinemann, USA. Knouse, S. B. (2001). Virtual Mentors: Mentoring on the Internet. Journal of Employment Counseling, 38(4