SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

An Alternative Approach for Manufacturing Performance Measuremenet: Prfence Selection Index (PSI) Method

İmalat Performansı Ölçümü İçin Alternatif Bir Yaklaşım: Tercih İndeksi (PSI) Yöntemi

Gökhan AKYÜZ
Salih AKA
Pages
63–77
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The application was performed in three separate production lines of the company in the glass industry and improvements in the performance of the lines for eight-month period of time were analyzed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The manufacturing firms have to monitor their performance to maintain competitive advantages and sustain improvements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, an approach based on Preference Selection Index (PSI) is proposed to calculate the manufacturing performance index at a specific time interval.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The application was performed in three separate production lines of the company in the glass industry and improvements in the performance of the lines for eight-month period of time were analyzed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The manufacturing firms have to monitor their performance to maintain competitive advantages and sustain improvements. In this study, an approach based on Preference Selection Index (PSI) is proposed to calculate the manufacturing performance index at a specific time interval. Unlike many methods in the literature, this method offers a systematic approach with simple calculations without the need to determine the relative weights of the criteria. The application was performed in three separate production lines of the company in the glass industry and improvements in the performance of the lines for eight-month period of time were analyzed

Özet

İmalatçı firmaların rekabetçi özelliklerini koruyabilmeleri ve gelişimlerini sürdürebilmeleri için performanslarını sürekli olarak takip etmeleri gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada, belirli bir zaman aralığında imalat performans indekslerini hesaplamak amacıyla Tercih İndeksi (Preference Selection Index - PSI) yöntemine dayalı bir yaklaşım önerilmiştir. Yöntem, literatürdeki birçok yöntemin aksine kriterlerin görece ağırlıklarını belirlemeye ihtiyaç duymadan, basit hesaplamalarla sistematik bir çözüm sunmaktadır. Uygulama cam sektöründe faaliyet gösteren bir firmanın üç ayrı imalat hattı için yapılmış ve sekiz aylık dönemde hatların performans gelişimi incelenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKYÜZ, G., AKA, S. (2022). An Alternative Approach for Manufacturing Performance Measuremenet: Prfence Selection Index (PSI) Method. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 63–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/556552

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Agrell, P.J. & West, B.M. (2001). A caveat on the measurement of productive efficiency. International Journal of Production Economics, 69(1), 1-14.
  2. Ahmad, M. & Dhafr, N. (2002). Establishing and improving manufacturing performance measures. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 18(3-4), 171-176.
  3. Akal, Z. (2005). İşletmelerde Performans Ölçüm ve Denetimi Çok Yönlü Performans Göstergeleri (6.Baskı). Ankara:
  4. MPM Yayınları.
  5. Akgül, A.K. (2011). İmalat Performansının Değerlendirilmesi. Öneri, 9(35), 173-181.
  6. Akyüz, G. (2006). Proses İmalatında Performans Ölçme Ve İyileştirmeye Yönelik Bir Modelleme Yaklaşımı: Bir Uygulama. Akdeniz Üniversitesi SBE Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Antalya. Almomani, M.A., Mohammed, A., Abdelhadi, A. ve Mumani, A. (2013). A proposed approach for setup time reduction through integrating conventional SMED method with multiple criteria decision-making techniques. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66, 461-469. Amaratunga D. & Baldry D. (2002). Performance Measurement in Facilities Management and its Relationships with Management Theory and Motivation. Facilities, 20(10), 327-336.
  7. Attri, R. & Grover, S. (2013). Application of preference selection index method for decision making over the design stage of production system life cycle. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, In Press,
  8. Corrected Proof, Available online 17 June 2013.
  9. Bititci, U.S., Suwignjo, P. & Carrie, A.S. (2001). Strategy management through quantitative modelling of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 69 (1), 15-22.
  10. Chan, D.C.K., Yung, K.L. & Ip, A.W.H. (2002). An application of fuzzy sets to process performance evaluation. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13 (4), 237-246.
  11. Chen, C.-C. (2008). An objective-oriented and product-line-based manufacturing performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 112 (1), 380-390.
  12. Chenhall, R.H. (1996). Strategies of manufacturing flexibility, manufacturing performance measures and organizational performance: an empirical investigation. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 7(5), 25-32.
  13. Chin, H.G. & Saman, M.Z.M. (2004). Proposed analysis of performance measurement for a production system. Business Process Management Journal, 10(5), 570-583.
  14. Christiansen, T., Berry, W.L., Bruun, P. & Ward, P. (2003). A mapping of competitive priorities, manufacturing practices, and operational performance in groups of Danish manufacturing companies. Intenational Journ