Journals / İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Flexible Manufacturing System Selection with Entropy based ROV Method

Entropi Temelli ROV Yöntemi İle Esnek Üretim Sistemi Seçimi

Pages
187–194
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since there is no study using ROV in Turkish literature, this study is thought to contribute to Turkish literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With increasing global competition, most manufacturing businesses turn to increase their production technologies to gain competitive advantage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Eight different alternatives are ranked with respect to their performance by using of this method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since there is no study using ROV in Turkish literature, this study is thought to contribute to Turkish literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

With increasing global competition, most manufacturing businesses turn to increase their production technologies to gain competitive advantage. Flexible manufacturing systems are also one of these production technologies. Flexible manufacturing systems have the capacity to produce a variety of products in a short time and in specified quantities. With the widespread use of advanced technology, manufacturing companies have begun using flexible manufacturing system to take advantage of benefits of this system. When evaluating or selecting of flexible manufacturing systems, many criteria, which are conflicted, should be considered. Hence, multi-criteria decision making methods are used in the evaluation or selection of flexible manufacturing systems. In this study, the flexible manufacturing systems will be selected with the Entropy based range of value (ROV) method. The objective weights of the criteria will be obtained by the Entropy method and alternatives will be ranked by the ROV method. Eight different alternatives are ranked with respect to their performance by using of this method. Since there is no study using ROV in Turkish literature, this study is thought to contribute to Turkish literature.

Özet

Küresel rekabetin artmasıyla çoğu üretim işletmesi rekabet avantajını elde etmek için üretim teknolojilerini geliştirmeye yönelmektedir. Esnek üretim sistemleri de bu üretim teknolojilerinden biridir. Esnek üretim sistemleri, çeşitli ürünleri kısa sürede ve belirlenen miktarlarda üretme kapasitesine sahiptir. İleri teknolojinin yaygınlaşması ile birlikte üretim yapan işletmeler esnek üretim sisteminin sağladığı avantajlardan faydalanabilmek için bu sistemi kullanmaya başlamıştır. Esnek üretim sistemi değerlendirilirken ya da seçilirken kimi birbiriyle çelişen birçok kriter göz önünde bulundurulmaktadır. Bu sebeple, esnek üretim sistemlerinin değerlendirmesinde veya seçiminde çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada Entropi temelli değer aralığı (range of value (ROV)) yöntemi ile esnek üretim sistemi seçimi yapılacaktır. Entropi yöntemiyle kriterlerin objektif ağırlıkları elde edilecek ve ROV yöntemi ile alternatif sıralaması yapılacaktır. Yöntemin kullanımı ile sekiz farklı alternatif performanslarına göre sıralanmıştır. Türkçe literatürde ROV yönteminin kullanıldığı çalışma bulunmadığından, bu çalışmanın Türkçe literatüre katkı sunacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUTAŞ, A. (2022). Flexible Manufacturing System Selection with Entropy based ROV Method. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 187–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/556449

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akçakanat, Ö., Eren, H., Aksoy, E., & Ömürbek, V. (2017). Bankacılık sektöründe entropi ve waspas yöntemleri ile performans değerlendirmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22 (2), 285-300.
  2. Athawale, V. M., & Chakraborty, S. (2011). A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2(4), 831-850.
  3. Bayazit, O. (2005). Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(7), 808-819.
  4. Basuki, A. (2016). Sustainable strategies selection in SMEs using MCDM approach. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 58). EDP Sciences (pp.1-6).
  5. Chan, F. T., Jiang, B., & Tang, N. K. (2000). The development of intelligent decision support tools to aid the design of flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 65(1), 73-84.
  6. Chatterjee, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2014). Flexible manufacturing system selection using preference ranking methods: A comparative study. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(2), 315-338.
  7. Ervural, B. Ç., Ervural, B., & Kabak, Ö. (2016). A Group decision making approach for the evaluation of flexible manufacturing systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 1329-1334.
  8. Hajkowicz, S., & Higgins, A. (2008). A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), 255-265.
  9. Işık, A. T., & Adalı, E. A. (2017). The decision-making approach based on the combination of entropy and ROV methods for the apple selection problem. EJIS European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, 8(1), 80-86.
  10. Karsak, E. E. (2002). Distance-based fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating flexible manufacturing system alternatives. International Journal of Production Research, 40(13), 3167-3181.
  11. Karsak, E. E. (2008). Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of imprecise data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35(9-10), 867-874.
  12. Kulak, O., & Kahraman, C. (2005). Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 95(3), 415-424.
  13. Li, X., Wang, K., Liu, L., Xin, J., Yang, H., & Gao, C. (2011). Application of the entropy weight and TOPSIS metho