Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

The Impact of the Personality Traits of an Actor on Their Position in the Social Network: A Study on Public Employees

Pages
3435–3452
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discassion – The absence of a study in the literature that deals with social network connections and personality traits together reveals the originality of the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – The aim of this research is examining whether the personality traits of the actors within a given social network have an impact on their partaking as central actors in the network and maintaining their brokerage role between the actors who do not have a connection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach – The network sample of the research consists of 73 individuals that worked in the same unit of a public institution located in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discassion – The absence of a study in the literature that deals with social network connections and personality traits together reveals the originality of the study.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this research is examining whether the personality traits of the actors within a given social network have an impact on their partaking as central actors in the network and maintaining their brokerage role between the actors who do not have a connection. Design/methodology/approach – The network sample of the research consists of 73 individuals that worked in the same unit of a public institution located in Ankara. In order to make social network analysis, the answers obtained from the questions asked to the actors were transferred to the UCINET program by creating a 73*73 matrix, and betweenness, centrality and network diagram analyzes were made. Then, the values obtained from the questionnaires made in order to determine the personality traits of the actors were entered into the SPSS 20 package program. Finally, within the scope of the analysis of the study, correlation and regression analyzes were carried out to determine whether there is a relationship between the data obtained from social network and personality traits. Findings – As a result of the analyses, the actors who has a high level of Machiavellian and neurotic personality traits fill the gaps within the social network and assume the role of a bridge / a broker. It is also founded that there is a negative relationship between the actor's neurotic personality traits and their centrality positions within the network. On the other hand, the actor's with high agreeableness personality trait are observed to be positioned at the center within the network. Discassion – The absence of a study in the literature that deals with social network connections and personality traits together reveals the originality of the study.

🔖

Cite This Article

FAYGANOĞLU, P. (2022). The Impact of the Personality Traits of an Actor on Their Position in the Social Network: A Study on Public Employees. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 3435–3452. https://ajindex.com/articles/556378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Allsopp, J., Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). Machiavellianism as a component in psychoticism and extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(1), 29-41.
  2. Asendorpf, J. B., and Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531–1544.
  3. Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 19(3), 289-303.
  4. Austin, E. J., Farrelly, D., Black, C., and Moore, H. (2007).
  5. Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side?. Personality and individual differences, 43(1), 179-189.
  6. Baer, M. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of applied psychology, 95(3), 592. Benet-Martinez, V. and John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitraitmultimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
  7. Bizzi, L. (2013). The dark side of structural holes: A multilevel investigation. Journal of management, 39(6), 1554- 1578. Blickle, G. 1996. Personality traits, learning stratigies, and performance. European Journal of personality, 10(5), 337-352.
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings LJ, 38, 805. Burt, R. S., Jannotta, J. E., and Mahoney, J. T. (1998). Personality correlates of structural holes. Social Networks, 20, 63 –87. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American journal of sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
  9. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford university press. Burt, R. S. (2010). Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford University Press.
  10. Casciaro, T. (1998). Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Social Networks, 20(4), 331–351. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(98)00008-2
  11. Christie, R., & Geis F.L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York Academic Pres, New York, N.Y:10-34.
  12. Clifton, A., Turkheimer, E. and Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Personality disorder in social networks: Network position as a marker of interpersonal dysfunction. Social Networks, 31(1), 26–32. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.08.003 Colbert, A. E., Barrick, M. R., and Bradley, B. H. (2014). Pers