Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

The Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance of Companies inSouthern Africa

Pages
1817–1834
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion – Regulators and companies in Southern Africa should put more emphasis on issuesregarding Shareholders rights, Board committees and disclosure requirements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between corporate governance andfinancial performance of companies, by looking at the magnitude to which publicly listed companiesacross Southern African countries have implemented corporate governance “best” practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach – Corporate governance index was created by collecting bothcorporate governance related data and financial data from annual reports of companies from 2013- 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion – Regulators and companies in Southern Africa should put more emphasis on issuesregarding Shareholders rights, Board committees and disclosure requirements.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013- 2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between corporate governance andfinancial performance of companies, by looking at the magnitude to which publicly listed companiesacross Southern African countries have implemented corporate governance “best” practices. Design/methodology/approach – Corporate governance index was created by collecting bothcorporate governance related data and financial data from annual reports of companies from 2013- 2019. Panel data was used with a set of 504 company-year observations. The corporate governanceindex and sub-indexes were used as independent variables in order to test their effect on company’sfinancial performance measured by Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE). The datawas analyzed using Panel data Ordinary Least Squared (POLS) regression and dynamic GMM. Findings – The findings show that companies in Southern African countries generally comply withthe recommended corporate governance “best” practices that are included in the index. The resultsfrom both the POLS and the dynamic GMM show that; the corporate governance index has a positiveand significant relationship with the companies’ financial performance measures (ROA and ROE).The results also shows that board committees’ sub-index, Shareholders right sub-index and Disclosuresub-index are positively and significantly related to financial performance as measured by ROA andROE. Discussion – Regulators and companies in Southern Africa should put more emphasis on issuesregarding Shareholders rights, Board committees and disclosure requirements.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKKARA, G., KARAYE, A. B. (2022). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance of Companies inSouthern Africa. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 1817–1834. https://ajindex.com/articles/556350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abor, J. & Fiador, V. (2013). Does corporate governance explain dividend policy in Sub-Saharan Africa? International Journal of Law and Management, 55(3), 201-225.
  2. Aggarwal, R. & Williamson, R. (2006), Did new regulations target the relevant corporate governance attributes?, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=859264 (accessed: 5 June 2019)
  3. Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25, 415–443.
  4. Ammann, M., Oescha, D., & Schmid M. M. (2011). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: International Evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18, 36-55.
  5. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.
  6. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.
  7. Armstrong, P. (2003). Status report on corporate governance reform in Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa, Pan-African Consultative Forum on Corporate Governance. Arora, A. & Bodhanwala, S. (2018). Relationship between Corporate Governance Index and Firm Performance: Indian Evidence. Global Business Review 19(3) 675–689.
  8. Balasubramanian, B., Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. (2010). The Relation between Firm-Level Corporate Governance and Market Value: a Study of India. Law & Economics, 10, 1-29.
  9. Barth, M.E. & Schipper, K. (2008). Financial reporting transparency. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 23(2), 73-190.
  10. Berle, A., & G. Means. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York, MacMillan. Black, B., Love, I. & Rachinsky, A. (2006). Corporate governance indices and firm’s market values: Time series evidence from Russia. Emerging Markets Review, 7(4), 361-379.
  11. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.
  12. Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, London, Gee Publishing. Cadbury, A. (2000). The Corporate Governance Agenda. Corporate Governance, 8, 7–15.
  13. Carvalhal-da-Silva, A. L. & Leal, R.P.C. (2005).
  14. Corporate Governance Index, Firm Valuation and Performance in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Financas, 3(1), 1–18. Cheung,Y., Jiang,P., Limpaphayom, P., & Lu, T. (2008). Does corporate governance matter in China? China Economic Review, 19, 460–47