Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 657

STOCK FUTURES MARKET EFFICIENCY AND PRICE DISCOVERY ROLE IN TURKEY

TÜRKİYE'DE HİSSE SENEDİ VADELİ İŞLEMLER PİYASASI ETKİNLİĞİ VE FİYAT KEŞİF ROLÜ

Pages
125–147
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The price discovery roles of futures and/or spot market create inefficiency that should be tested in further studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study analyzes short-run a nd long-run relations with Johansen cointegration and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) using Borsa İstanbul BİST 30 index daily closing spot and futures prices within the period of August 1, 2013 to July 15, 2016.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the long-run, the cointegration relationship between spot and futures markets is observed consis tent with market efficiency concept.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The price discovery roles of futures and/or spot market create inefficiency that should be tested in further studies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study analyzes short-run a nd long-run relations with Johansen cointegration and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) using Borsa İstanbul BİST 30 index daily closing spot and futures prices within the period of August 1, 2013 to July 15, 2016. In the long-run, the cointegration relationship between spot and futures markets is observed consis tent with market efficiency concept. However, spot market affects the futures market in the short-run that may distort efficiency because of transac- tion costs, leverage, or marketability effects. The study also highlights the idea that with different periods and maturity selected in futures market, the price discovery role may change from futures market to spot market in the short-run. The price discovery roles of futures and/or spot market create inefficiency that should be tested in further studies.

Özet

Bu çalışma 01.08.2013-15.07.2016 döneminde Borsa İstanbul BİST 30 endeksi günlük spot ve vadeli işlemler kapan ış fiyatlarını kullanarak Johansen Eşbütünleşme ve Vektör Hata Düzeltme Modeli (VECM) ile kısa ve uzun vadeli ilişkileri analiz etmektedir. Uzun dönemde, spot ve vadeli piyasalar arasında piyasa etkinliği kavramı ile tutarlı olarak eşbütünleşme ilişkisi gözlemlenmiştir. Ancak k ısa vadede spot piyasa vadeli işlemler piyasasını işlem maliyetleri, kaldıraç veya pazarlanabilirlik etkileri nedeniyle etkilemektedir ki bu da etkinli ği bozabilmektedir. Çalışma vadeli i şlemler piyasasında far- klı periyotlar ve vadeler seçilirse, fiyat ke şif rolünün k ısa vadede vadeli işlemler piyasasından spot piyasasına da kayabileceğine dikkat çekmektedir. Ve vadeli işlemler ve/veya spot piyasasının fiyat keşif rolünün yaratacağı etkinsizliğin ilerleyen çalışmalarda test edilmesi gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKKARA, Z. G. (2022). STOCK FUTURES MARKET EFFICIENCY AND PRICE DISCOVERY ROLE IN TURKEY. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 657, 125–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/516489

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. AHN, Kwangwon, Yingyao Bİ and Sungbin SOHN; (2019), “Price Discovery Among SSE 50 Index-based Spot, Futures, and Options Markets”, Journal of Futures Markets, 39(2), pp. 238-259.
  2. ANTONIOU, Antonios and Phil HOLMES; (1996), “Futures Market Efficiency, The Unbi- asedness Hypothesis and Vari ance-Bound Tests: The Case of the Ftse-100 Futures Contract.”, Bulletin of Economic Research, 48(2), pp. 115-128.
  3. ARSHANAPALLI, Bala. and John DOUKAS; (1997), “The Linkages of S&P 500 Stock Index and S&P 500 Stock Index Futures Prices during October 1987.”, Journal of Eco- nomics and Business, 49(3), pp. 253-266.
  4. BİLGİLİ, Faik; (1998), “Stationarity and Cointegration Tests: Comparison of Engle- Granger and Johansen Methodologies", Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, pp. 131-141.
  5. BOHL, Martin T., Christian A. SALM and Michael SCHUPPLI; (2011). "Price Discovery and Investor Structure in Stock Index Futures.", The Journal of Futures Markets, 31(3), pp. 282-306.
  6. BOOTH, Geoffrey G., Raymond W. SO and Yiuman TSE; (1999), “Price Discovery in the German Equity Index Derivatives Markets.”, Journal of Futures Markets, 19(6), pp. 619-643.
  7. BROOKS, Chris; (2008), Introductory Econometrics for Finance, Cambridge University Press,
  8. United Kingdom. ÇAĞLI, Efe Ç. and Pınar Evrim MANDACİ; (2013), “The long-run Relationship Between the Spot and Futures Markets Under Multiple Regime-shifts: Evidence from Turkish Derivatives Exchange.”, 40, pp. 4206-4212.
  9. CHOUDHARY, Kaphil. and Sushil BAJAJ; (2012), “Intraday Lead/Lag Relationships between the Futures and Spot Market”, Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 5(9), pp. 165-186.
  10. CHU, Quentin C., Wen-liang Gideon HSIEH and Yiuman TSE; (1999), “Price Discovery on the S&P 500 Index Markets: An Analysis of Spot Index, Index Futures and SPDRs.”, International Review of Financial Analysis, 8(1), pp. 21-34
  11. CROWDER, William J. and Chanwit PHENGPIS; (2005), “Stability of the S&P500 Fu- tures Market Efficiency Conditions”, Applied Financial Economics, 15(12), pp. 855- 866. ENGLE, Robert F. and Clive W. J. GRANGER; (1987), “Cointegration and Error Correc- tion: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), pp. 251-276.
  12. ERSOY, Ersan and Ali BAYRAKDAROĞLU; (2013), “İMKB 30 endeksi ile VOB-İMKB 30 endeks vadeli işlem sözleşmeleri aras ındaki öncül-ardıl ilişkisi.”, İstanbul Üniver- sitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(1), 26-40.
  13. ERSOY, Ersan and Levent ÇITAK; (2015), “Intraday Lead-Lag Relationship betwe