Dizin / İndeks ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Veri Tabanı, EBSCOHOST, Index Copernicus, Proquest Education Journals Database, Modern Language Association, Citefactor, The Directory of Research Journal Indexing, Open Academic Journal Index, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dizin / İndeks ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Veri Tabanı, EBSCOHOST, Index Copernicus, Proquest Education Journals Database, Modern Language Association, Citefactor, The Directory of Research Journal Indexing, Open Academic Journal Index, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory
📊
Key Findings & Data:Dizin / İndeks ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Veri Tabanı, EBSCOHOST, Index Copernicus, Proquest Education Journals Database, Modern Language Association, Citefactor, The Directory of Research Journal Indexing, Open Academic Journal Index, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Dizin / İndeks ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Veri Tabanı, EBSCOHOST, Index Copernicus, Proquest Education Journals Database, Modern Language Association, Citefactor, The Directory of Research Journal Indexing, Open Academic Journal Index, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Sosyal öz-yeterlik · sosyal sonuç beklentileri · geçerlik
Abstract
Dizin / İndeks ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Veri Tabanı, EBSCOHOST, Index Copernicus, Proquest Education Journals Database, Modern Language Association, Citefactor, The Directory of Research Journal Indexing, Open Academic Journal Index, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory
Özet
Bu araştırmanın amacı Sosyal Yeterlik ve Sosyal Sonuç Beklentileri Ölçeğinin (Wright, Wright ve JenkinsGuarnieri, 2013) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliğini incelemektir. Araştırma 177’si kız, 118’i erkek olmak üzere 295 üniversite öğrencisi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için uygulanan açımlayıcı faktör analizinde KMO örneklem uygunluk katsayısı .95, Barlett Sphericity testi x² değeri 3155.501 (p
AKIN, D. D. A., AKKAYA, O. (2015). Sosyal Yeterlik ve Sosyal Sonuç Beklentileri Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 204–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/55629
Akın, A. Ve İskender, M. (2010). Social self-efficacy, academic locus of control and internet addiction. Computers and Education, 54, 1101-110.
Anderson, S. L. ve Betz, N. E. (2001). Sources of social self-efficacy expectations: Their mea- surement and relation to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 98-117.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-337).
Charlotte, NC: Information Age. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38, 9-44.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö., Kahveci, Ö. ve Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçeği'nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
Caprara, G. V. ve Steca, P. (2007). Prosocial agency: The contribution of values and self-efficacy beliefs to prosocial behavior across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 218-239.
Caprara, G. V. ve Steca, P. (2005). Prosocial behavior conducive to life satisfaction across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 191-217.
DeWitz, S. J. ve Walsh, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy and college student satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 315-326.
DeWitz, S. J., Woolsely, M. L. ve Walsh, W. B. (2009). College student retention: An exploration of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and purpose in life among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 19-34.
Hermann, K. S. ve Betz, N. E. (2004). Path models of the relationships of instrumentality and expressiveness, social self-efficacy, shyness, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 1086-1106.
Hermann, K. S. ve Betz, N. E. (2006). Path models of the relationships of instrumentality and expressiveness, social self-efficacy, and self-esteem to depressive symptoms in college students. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 1086-1106.
Hu, L. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alter