Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Dark Leadership on Organizational Commitment: A Research in The Banking Sector

Pages
1446–1462
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings – Study findings reveal a significant negative impact of the dark leadership on the bankers’ organizational commitment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine the impacts of dark leadership on organizational commitment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach – In this study, there are 559 employees who work either in a bank branch or a general directorate of banking in Istanbul.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings – Study findings reveal a significant negative impact of the dark leadership on the bankers’ organizational commitment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine the impacts of dark leadership on organizational commitment. As opposed to the positive leadership styles’ benefits, it is expected to see a negative impact of the negative leadership styles on organizational commitment. Dark leadership is a term to describe the leadership in a context where the leaders’ negative personality traits negatively affect the organizational decision-making and the public impression of the organization. Design/methodology/approach – In this study, there are 559 employees who work either in a bank branch or a general directorate of banking in Istanbul. To examine the impacts of the dark leadership on the bankers’ organizational commitment, “simple linear regression analysis” and “multiple linear regression analysis” are used. Findings – Study findings reveal a significant negative impact of the dark leadership on the bankers’ organizational commitment. Moreover, it is found that dark leadership has meaningful negative impacts on the bankers’ affective commitment and continuance commitment. Furthermore, findings show a positive impact of the dark leadership on the bankers’ normative commitment. There is limited empirical research related to the impacts of dark leadership on organizational commitment; therefore, this study aims to contribute to the gap in the human resources management, organizational behavior, and management and organizations literature. Discussion – It is possible to say that dark leadership should seek help from experts and/or institutions in order to prevent the negative effect of dark leadership on employees' organizational commitments. At this point, the human resources management unit plays an important role in identifying dark leaders.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIREL, Y., BAHADIR, N. (2022). The Effect of Dark Leadership on Organizational Commitment: A Research in The Banking Sector. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 1446–1462. https://ajindex.com/articles/556162

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akhtar, S., & Shaukat, K. (2016). Impact of Petty Tyranny on Alienation from Work: Role of SelfEsteem and Power-Distance. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 1-11.
  2. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1991). The Measurement and Antecedents ofAffective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  3. Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L. (1981). An Empirical Assessment of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 1-14.
  4. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L.-Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201.
  5. Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty Tyranny in Organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755-778.
  6. Avey, J. B., Palanski, M. E., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2011). When Leadership Goes Unnoticed: The Moderating Role of Follower Self-Esteem on the Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Follower Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 573–582.
  7. Ballı, E. (2014). Otel işletmelerinde Karanlık Liderliğin Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Sessizlik Üzerine Etkisi. Doktora Tezi. Mersin, Türkiye: Ulusal Tez Merkezi. Ballı, E., & Ballı, A. İ. (2017). Karanlik Liderlik ve Örgütsel Etik İklim Arasındaki İlişki: Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 74-81.
  8. Ballı, E., & Çakıcı, A. (2016). Karanlık Liderliğin Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Sessizlik Üzerine Etkisi: Otel Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(3), 167- 180. Başar, U. (2019). Liderin Karanlık Kişilik Özellikleri İle Çalışanın Tükenmişliği Arasındaki İlişkide Çalışanın Karanlık Liderlik Algısının Aracı Rolü: Çok Düzeyli Bir Araştırma. Doktora Tezi. Ankara, Türkiye: Ulusal Tez Merkezi. Başar, U., Sığrı, Ü., & Basım, N. (2016). İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(2), 65-76.
  9. Bateman, T., & Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 95-112.
  10. Bayram, L. (2005). Yönetimde Yeni Bir Paradigma: Örgütsel Bağlılık. Sayıştay Dergisi(59), 125-139.
  11. Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci And Bases Of Employee Commitment: Implications For Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 464-482.
  12. Biçer, C. (2020).
  13. Mirror, Mirror, On The Wall, Who's The Fairest Of Them All? Narcis