SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

Discrepancies in Evaluating Farm Management Routines as Risk Factors of Raw Milk and Udder Hygiene in Selected Dairy Farms of Fars Province, Iran

Maryam ANSARI-LARI
Mehdi MOHEBBI-FANI
Seyed Shahram SHEKARFOROUSH
Saeed HOSSEINZADEH
Maedeh MOUSAVI-DAVOODI
Reza KHORRAMI
Pages
138–149
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Associations of managerial risk factors (obtained by the questionnaire and one time of observation) with laboratory results were investigated using two independent samples t-test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The management practices relevant to bulk tank milk quality were studied in 29 dairy farms of Fars Province, Iran.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The farms were divided into low and high SPC groups (below and above 100,000 CFU/mL) based on Iranian standards.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Associations of managerial risk factors (obtained by the questionnaire and one time of observation) with laboratory results were investigated using two independent samples t-test.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The management practices relevant to bulk tank milk quality were studied in 29 dairy farms of Fars Province, Iran. Farm management practices were obtained by completion of a questionnaire and direct observation. Bulk milk was evaluated by performing standard plate count (SPC), preliminary incubation count (PIC), laboratory pasteurization count (LPC), coliform count (CC), somatic cell count (SCC) and detection of the contagious mastitis agents. The farms were divided into low and high SPC groups (below and above 100,000 CFU/mL) based on Iranian standards. Comparisons of the laboratory results between groups were done using two independent samples t-test. The relationships between the laboratory results were studied by Pearson's correlation coefficients, all after logarithmic transformation. Associations of managerial risk factors (obtained by the questionnaire and one time of observation) with laboratory results were investigated using two independent samples t-test. P-values

🔖

Cite This Article

ANSARI-LARI, M., MOHEBBI-FANI, M., SHEKARFOROUSH, S. S., HOSSEINZADEH, S., MOUSAVI-DAVOODI, M., KHORRAMI, R. (2022). Discrepancies in Evaluating Farm Management Routines as Risk Factors of Raw Milk and Udder Hygiene in Selected Dairy Farms of Fars Province, Iran. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 138–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/555043

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ahmadi, M., Razavi Rohani, S.M., Ayremlou, N., 2009. Evaluation of Streptococcus agalactiae detection by PCR in milk and its comparison to other microbiological methods. Iranian Journal of Microbiology 1, 28-31.
  2. Bolourchi, M., Kasravi, R., Tabatabayi, A.H., Hovareshti. P., 2004. The effect of a mastitis control program on some udder health and milk quality indices in a large dairy herd in Tehran Province. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran 59, 115-124.
  3. Bolourchi, M., Mokhber Dezfouli, M.R., Kasravi, R., Moghimi Esfandabadi, A., Hovareshti, P., 2008. An estimation of national average of milk somatic cell count and production losses due to subclinical mastitis in commercial dairy herds in Iran. Journal of Veterinary Research 63, 263-266.
  4. Boss, R., Naskova, J., Steiner, A., Graber, H.U., 2011. Mastitis diagnostics: quantitative PCR for Staphylococcus aureus genotype B in bulk tank milk. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 128-137.
  5. Bramley, A.J., McKinnon, C.H., Staker, R.T., Simpkin, D.L., 1984. The effect of udder infection on the bacterial flora of the bulk milk of ten dairies. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 57, 317-323.
  6. Bramley, A.M, McKinnon, C.H., 1990. The microbiology of raw milk. In: Robinson R.K., (Ed.), Dairy Microbiology, Elsevier Science Publishers, London, pp 163-208.
  7. Britten, A.M., Emerson, T., 1996. A bulk tank culturing program for monitoring milk quality and udder health. Proceedings of the 35th National Mastitis Council, 149- 150. Britten, A.M., 1998. Is Strep mastitis causing high bacteria counts in your bulk tank? Proceedings of the 37th National Mastitis Council, pp. 26-34.
  8. Chambers, J.V., 2002. The microbiology of raw milk. In: Robinson, R.K. (Ed.), Dairy Microbiology Handbook. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, pp. 39-90.
  9. Cousin, M.A., 1982. Presence and activity of psychrotrophic microorganisms in milk and dairy products: A review. Journal of Food Protection 45, 172-207.
  10. Ellis, K.A., Innocent, G.T., Mihm, M., Cripps, P., McLean, W.G., Howard, C.V., Grove-White, D., 2007. Dairy cow cleanliness and milk quality on organic and conventional farms in the UK. Journal of Dairy Research 74, 302-310.
  11. Elmoslemany, A.M., Keefe, G.P., Dohoo, I.R., Jayarao, B.M., 2009a. Risk factors for bacteriological quality of bulk tank milk in Prince Edward Island dairy herds. Part 1. Overall risk factors. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2634- 2643. Elmoslemany, A.M., Keefe, G.P., Dohoo, I.R., Jayarao, B.M., 2009b. Risk factors for bacter