Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 52

TÜRKİYE'DE E-DEVLETİN KAZANIMI

Pages
11–34
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In Turkey, e-governmentcould achieve more gains in regard to meeting expectations for efficiency and effectiveness of public organizations .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Use of information and communication technologies in public administration to provide e-services, increase public management effectiveness, improve democratic values and mechanicm, support innovatiness and socio-economic development could help public organizations development and enhance the knowledge society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The interaction between tecnology, processes, social and cultural aspects, and public management function should be taken into account.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In Turkey, e-governmentcould achieve more gains in regard to meeting expectations for efficiency and effectiveness of public organizations .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Use of information and communication technologies in public administration to provide e-services, increase public management effectiveness, improve democratic values and mechanicm, support innovatiness and socio-economic development could help public organizations development and enhance the knowledge society. The interaction between tecnology, processes, social and cultural aspects, and public management function should be taken into account. In Turkey, e-governmentcould achieve more gains in regard to meeting expectations for efficiency and effectiveness of public organizations .

Özet

Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin, kamu hizmetleri sunmak, yönetsel etkililiği artırmak, demokratik değerleri ve yapıları geliştirmek, yenilikçiliği ve ülke kalkınmasını desteklemek üzere kamu yönetimi uygulamalarına konu olması, kurumsal gelişimi ve bilgi toplumunu da güçlendirebilir. Kamu yönetiminde, teknoloji, süreçler, toplumsal ve kültürel boyutlar ile yönetim işlevinin etkileşimi değerlendirilebilirse, Türkiyede e-devlet kazanımlarından beklentileri sağlama düzeyi gelişebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖKTEM, K. M. (2022). TÜRKİYE'DE E-DEVLETİN KAZANIMI. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 52, 11–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/554749

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. • ABD e-devlet sayfası (2010), “Government made easy”, (Er ş m 26.2.2010) (www. USA.gov). • Adema, W. and M. Ladaique (2009), “How Expens ve is the Welfare State?: Gross and Net Ind cators in the OECD Social Expenditure Database (SOCX)”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 92, OECD Publishing. • Abu–Shanab, E. A., Harb, Y. A., & Al–Zoubi, S. Y. (2013). E–government as an ant –corrupt on Tool: Citizens Perceptions. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6, 3: 232-248. • Adams, Carl and Peter Millard (2014) “The Evolution of State, People and Corporate Relationship in e-Government“, Proceedings of The 14th European Conference one-Government ECEG 2014, Romaina: 10-14. •Ağaoğlu, A. (2010), “Brezilya’da IMF kaçıncı defa alınmış?”, Vatan, 13.1.2010. •Alkahtani, M.M. ve A.J. Meadows (1999), “Management Automat on in Saudi Arabia – A Case-Study of a Developing-Country”, Journal of Information Science, 25, 5: 418-422. • Bayazıt, T. (2010), “Ucuz Krediye Şöhretli Değil Şeffaf Şirketler Kolay Ulaşacak”,Vatan, 13.1.2010. • Berkman, M.A. (2010), “Yerli Yatırımcı İçinde Bir Ajans Kurulsun”, Vatan, 12.1.2010. •Boswell, W. (2010), “The Top Ten Best Web Sites of the Decade: The sites that made a difference in how we use the Web”, _____http://websearch.about.com/od/webd rector1/tp/best-web-s tes-of-the-decade.htm>, 4.1.2010. •Braun, S., C. Kunzmann ve A. Schm dt (2010), “People Tagging & Ontology Ma- turing: Towards Collaborative Competence Management”, n: David Randall and Pascal Salembier (eds.): From CSCW to Web2.0: European Developments in Collaborative Design Selected Papers from COOP08, Computer Supported Cooperat ve Work vol., Spr nger, pp.133-154. •Capgemini (2007), “The user challenge: Benchmarking the supply of online public services”, 7th measurement, September 2007, _____http://ec.europa.eu/ information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/benchmarking/egov_benchmark_2007.pdf>, 20.3.2009. •Davutoğlu, A. (2009), Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu, İs- tanbul: Küre Yayınları, Stratejik Araştırmalar 1 (2001; 38. Baskı 2009). •Doğan, Y. (2010), “Don Kişot Yel Değirmenler ne Türkiye İnternete”, Hürriyet, 7.7.2010. •Downing, C.E. (1999), “System Usage Behavior as a Proxy for User Satisfaction – An Emprical-Investigation”, Information & Management, 35, 4: 203-216. •DPT (2007),
  2. OECD e-Devlet Çalışmaları Türkiye, Ankara (OECD 2006). •Economist (2010), “A special report on social networking: Yammering away at the office - A distract