Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi Seri B / 2008 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1

Landscape aesthetic and visual quality assessment

Peyzaj estetiği ve görsel kalite değerlendirmesi

Pages
39–51
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, according to the literature, it is viewed that, Aesthetic paradigms in landscape has been changed related with current conditions; it is insufficient for landscape being analyzed only by design elements and principles, also it is necessary for use aesthetic sense that sustainability related wit landscape ecology must be concerned as an essential principle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Measuring the landscape aesthetics, in other words determination of visual quality value that can be considered as new matter for our country has been one of the main subjects for the disciplines studying on the environment for a long time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For better understanding the landscape aesthetics concept and visual quality assessment approaches, first it is necessary to examine the studies realized on these topics.In this study, considering the implementation areas of the related studies, approaches on visual quality measuring and assessment was investigated by an extensive literature review.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, according to the literature, it is viewed that, Aesthetic paradigms in landscape has been changed related with current conditions; it is insufficient for landscape being analyzed only by design elements and principles, also it is necessary for use aesthetic sense that sustainability related wit landscape ecology must be concerned as an essential principle.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Measuring the landscape aesthetics, in other words determination of visual quality value that can be considered as new matter for our country has been one of the main subjects for the disciplines studying on the environment for a long time. For better understanding the landscape aesthetics concept and visual quality assessment approaches, first it is necessary to examine the studies realized on these topics.In this study, considering the implementation areas of the related studies, approaches on visual quality measuring and assessment was investigated by an extensive literature review. In this way, the study aims to guide about visual quality measuring and assessment for further studies. In conclusion, according to the literature, it is viewed that, Aesthetic paradigms in landscape has been changed related with current conditions; it is insufficient for landscape being analyzed only by design elements and principles, also it is necessary for use aesthetic sense that sustainability related wit landscape ecology must be concerned as an essential principle.

Özet

Peyzaj estetiğinin ölçülmesi, diğer bir deyişle görsel kalite değerinin saptanması, ülkemiz için yeni sayılmasına karşın, uzun yıllar boyunca çevre ile ilgili çalışan disiplinlerin vazgeçilmez konularından biri olmuştur. Peyzaj estetiği kavramım ve görsel kalite değerlendirme yaklaşımlarım daha iyi anlayabilmek için öncelikle, bu konularda yapılan çalışmaları incelemek gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada, görsel kalite ölçme ve değerlendirme yaklaşımları, ilgili çalışmaların uygulama alanları da dikkate alınarak, geniş bir literatür araştırması doğrultusunda irdelenmiştir ve böylelikle, görsel kalite değerlendirmesi ve ölçümü konularında daha sonra yapılacak çalışmalara yol gösterici olmak amaçlanmıştır. Sonuçta elde edilen bilgiler ışığında estetik kavramının günümüz koşullarında değiştiği gözlemlenmiş, peyzajın sadece tasarım öğe ve ilkeleri açısından değerlendirilmesinin yetersiz olduğu, kullanıcı beğenisi için peyzajın ekolojik anlamda da sürdürülebilirliliğinin temel alınması gerekliliği ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDÖNMEZ, İ. M. Ö., KAPTANOĞLU, A. Y. Ç. (2022). Landscape aesthetic and visual quality assessment. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi Seri B, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1, 39–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/554613

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acar, C. ve Ç. K. Kurdoğlu, 2005. Kaçkar Dağları milli parkında görsel kalite değerlendirmesi. Korunan Doğal Alanlar Sempozyumu, 8-10
  2. Eylül, Sözlü Bildiriler Kitabı. s:219-226.
  3. İsparta. Akın, E. 1995. Mimarlıkta estetik değerlendirmeye bir yaklaşım. Gazi Üniversitesi,Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 10(1): 19-57.
  4. Appleyard, D., K. Lynch, J.R. Myer, 1966.
  5. The View from the Road. MIT. Arriaza, M., J.F. Canas-Ortega, J.A. Canas-Madueno, P. Ruiz-Aviles, 2004. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning. 69:115-125.
  6. Arthur, L., R. Boster, 1976. Measuring scenic beauty: a selected bibliography, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-25. Arthur, L.M., 1977. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments: some empirical tests. Forest Science. 23(2). ASLA (American Society Of Landscape Architects), 1999. What landscape architects do?, http://198.82.207.19/va-asla/ulapr2.html
  7. Bayley, M., B. Curtis, K. Lupton and C. Wright, 2004. Vehicle aesthetics and their impact on the pedestrian environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 9(6): 437-450.
  8. Bergen, S., R.J. McGaughey and J. Fridley, 1998. Data-driven simulation, dimensional accuracy and realism in a landscape visualization tool. Landscape and Urban Planning. 40(4): 283-293. BCMF (British Colombia Ministry of Forests), 1997. Visual Landscape Inventory: Procedures and Standards Manual, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Forest Practices Branch for the Culture Task Force, Resources Inventory Committee. CALS (College of Agricultural and Life Sciences), 1999. Visual Resource, http://www.wiso.edu/pubs/ug/04 cals/landarch.html Ceylan, T.M., 2003.
  9. Fotoğraf, Estetik ve Görüntü Üzerine, IFSAK Clarke, M.L., and J.D., Martas, 1999. Visual resource management.http://www.sfrc.ufl.edu/Extension/pubtxt/cl020f.html
  10. Clay, G. R., Daniel T.C., (2000). Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning. 49(1-2): 1-13.
  11. Craik, K.H., 1968. The Comprehension of The Everyday Physical Environment. Journal of the. American Institute of Planners. 34:29-37.
  12. Craik, K. 1972. Psychological factors in landscape appraisal. Environment and Behavior. 4: 255-266.
  13. Craik, K.H. 1975. Individual variations in landscape descriptions, p: 130-150. In Landscape Assessment: Value, Perceptions and Resources (Ed:Zube, E.H. et al). Stroudsburg. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross. Çepel, N., 1990. Ekoloji Terimleri S