Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

Soil fauna: Classification and status in soil food web

Toprak faunası: Sınıflandırılması ve besin ağındaki yeri

Pages
139–152
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Soil food web studies try to figure out the relations amongthese functional groups connected with each other’s.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil ecology; deals with primary production in soil, soil fauna and flora, litter decomposition,nutrient cycle, soil food web, soil biodiversity, and interrelations with soil processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Soil ecologists who are specially working on these processes separate the organisms in two simpleunits as “guild” and “functional groups” according to their roles on ecosystem processes such as foodresource, dietary specializations, reproductive rates and defense strategies against predators ordistribution in soil profile.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Soil food web studies try to figure out the relations amongthese functional groups connected with each other’s.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Soil ecology; deals with primary production in soil, soil fauna and flora, litter decomposition,nutrient cycle, soil food web, soil biodiversity, and interrelations with soil processes. Organisms living insoil have vital importance on these processes, however, estimation of the impact of each organism is toodifficult. Soil ecologists who are specially working on these processes separate the organisms in two simpleunits as “guild” and “functional groups” according to their roles on ecosystem processes such as foodresource, dietary specializations, reproductive rates and defense strategies against predators ordistribution in soil profile. Communities within functional groups connected each other’s with therelations such as competition and hunting. Soil food web studies try to figure out the relations amongthese functional groups connected with each other’s.

Özet

Toprak ekolojisi; toprak içerisindeki primer üretim, toprak flora ve faunası, ölüörtü ayrışması,besin döngüsü, toprak besin ağı, toprak biyoçeşitliliği ve bunların toprak süreçleriyle arasındaki ilişkileriaraştırmaktadır. Toprak içerisinde yaşayan canlılar bu süreçlerde hayati rol oynarlar, ancak bucanlıların tek başlarına etkilerinin hesaplanması çok zordur. Bu süreçleri çalışan toprak ekologları,canlıları birlik ve fonksiyonel grup olarak iki basit birime ayırmaktadır. Toprak canlılarının oluşturduğubirlikler birimlere bölünür. Bu birimler beslenme kaynakları, beslenme şekilleri, üreme oranları, avcılarakarşı savunma yöntemleri veya toprak profilindeki dağılımları gibi ekosistem süreçlerindeki rollerinegöre fonksiyonel gruplara ayrılırlar. Fonksiyonel gruplar içerisindeki komüniteler rekabet ve avlanmagibi ilişkiler ile birbirlerine bağlıdır. Toprak besin ağı çalışmaları birbirine bağlı olan bu fonksiyonelgruplar arasındaki ilişkileri ortaya koymaya çalışmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, M., MAKİNECİ, E. (2022). Soil fauna: Classification and status in soil food web. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 139–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/554368

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. André, H. M., Ducarme, X., and Lebrun, P., 2002. Soil biodiversity: myth, reality or conning? Oikos. 96: 3-24.
  2. Ashwini, K.M. and K.R. Sridhar, 2005. Leaf litter preference and conversion by a saprophagous tropical pill millipede, Arthrosphaera magna Attems. Pedobiologia. 49: 307-316.
  3. Bardgett, R.D., 2005. The Biology of Soils: A Community and Ecosystem Approach. Oxford University Press,
  4. Oxford. Bardgett, R.D., W.D. Bowman, R. Kaufmann, and S.K. Schmidt, 2005. A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution. 20: 634-641.
  5. Barros, E., P. Curmi, V. Hallaire, A. Chauvel, and P. Lavelle, 2001. The role of macrofauna in the transformation and reversibility of soil structure of an oxisol in the process of forest to pasture conversion. Geoderma. 100: 193-213.
  6. Berg, B. and R. Laskowski, 2006. Litter Decomposition: a Guide to Carbon and Nutrient Turnover. Academic Press,
  7. USA. Berg, B. and McClaugherty, 2008.
  8. Plant Litter, Decomposition, Humus Formation, Carbon Sequestration. 2.ed. Springer. Berlin. Bird, S.B., R.N. Coulson, and R.F. Fisher, 2004. Changes in soil and litter arthropod abundance following tree harvesting and site preparation in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation.Forest Ecology and Management. 202: 195-208.
  9. Blomqvist, M.M., H. Olff, M.B. Blaauw, T. Bongers, and W.H. van der Putten, 2000. Interactions between above- and belowground biota: importance for small- scale vegetation mosaics in a grassland ecosystem. Oikos. 90: 582-598.
  10. Brussaard, L., M.M. Pulleman, E. Ouedraogo, A. Mando and J. Six, 2007. Soil fauna and soil in the fabric of the food web. Pedobiologia. 50: 447-462. Brussaard. L., 1998. Soil fauna, guilds, functional groups and ecosystem precesses. Applied soil Ecology. 9: 123-135.
  11. Cardon, Z.G. and J.L. Whitbeck, 2007. The The Rhizosphere An Ecological Perspective, Elsevier Inc., USA. Chamberlain, P.M., N.P. McNamara, J. Chaplow, A.W. Stott and H.IJ. Black, 2006. Translocation of surface litter carbon into soil by Collembola. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 38: 2655-2664.
  12. Chapin, F.S., P.A. Matson and H.A. Mooney, 2002. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer. New York. Cole, L. and R.D. Bardgett, 2002. Soil animals, microbial interactions and nutrient cycling. In: Lal, R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Soil Science. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 72-75.
  13. Cole, L., M.A. Bradford, P.J.A. Shaw and R.D. Bardgett, 2006. The abundance, richness and functional role of soil meso and macrofaun