Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Sigara Kullanan Tüketicilerin Kullandıkları Sigara Markasının İmajına Yönelik Algılarına Göre Gruplandırılması

Pages
29–50
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A sample of 600 smokers from different parts of Istanbul has been questioned by face to face interview technique during the data collection of the project.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:According to their individual experience with the brand, customer's perception of brand image varies dynamically and plays an important role on the brand's market share.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research smokers, according to their perceptions towards cigarette's brand image has been determined and variables which identify these consumer segments has been found.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A sample of 600 smokers from different parts of Istanbul has been questioned by face to face interview technique during the data collection of the project.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

According to their individual experience with the brand, customer's perception of brand image varies dynamically and plays an important role on the brand's market share. In this research smokers, according to their perceptions towards cigarette's brand image has been determined and variables which identify these consumer segments has been found. First, smokers' consumption patterns, characters tics of their preferred brand, their socio economic and cultural level has been measured. Cluster Analysis is used to observe these key variables, which has an influence on consumer segmentation in the tobacco industry. Then, Analysis of variance is used to observe variables which have an effect to make up consumers sub segment. A sample of 600 smokers from different parts of Istanbul has been questioned by face to face interview technique during the data collection of the project.

Özet

Tüketicilerin edinmiş oldukları tecrübeler çerçevesince, kendilerine sunulan marka imajları karşısındaki algıları her geçen gün farklılaşmakta ve markaların pazar payları üzerinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Araştırmamızda, sözü edilen etkileşimin görüldüğü sigara sektörü temel alınmış olup, kullandıkları sigara marka imajlarjna yönelik algılarına göre tüketici grupları incelenmiştir. İlk aşamada; tüketicilerin kullanım alışkanlıkları, tercih ettikleri sigara markalarının özellikleri, sosyallik seviyeleri, demografik ve sosyo-kültürel özellikleri ölçümlenmiştir. Araştırmamızda, tüketicilerin kullandıkları sigara markasının imajına yönelik algıları temel alınarak, alt hedef tüketici grupları (kümeler) altında toplanması incelenmiştir. Araştırınamızın ilk aşamasında Kümeleme analizi (Cluster Analysis) kullanılmıştır. İkinci aşamada ise; Anova Analizi kullanılarak, alt hedef tüketici gruplarını temsil eden kümelerin oluşumunda etkili olan değişkenler incelenmiştir. Araştırmamız veri ve bilgileri; İstanbul'un farklı semtlerinde ikamet eden 600 cevaplayıcıdan; tesadüfi olmayan kotalara göre örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak temin edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKERKAYA, A. (2022). Sigara Kullanan Tüketicilerin Kullandıkları Sigara Markasının İmajına Yönelik Algılarına Göre Gruplandırılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 29–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/554072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ALLIANCE-UNICHEM Plc., 2003, http://www.alliance-unichem.com, (Mayıs 2003).
  2. BARNIR Anat, Ken A. Smith, 2002, "Inter-firm Alliances in the Small Business the Role of Social Networks", Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), s: 219-232.
  3. BUCKLIN Louis P., Sanjit Sengupta, 1993, "Organizing Successful Co-Marketing Alliances'", Journal of Mattering, Vol.57, No.2, s:32-46.
  4. CHAN Su Han, John W. Kesinger ve dig. 1997, "Do Strategic Alliances Create Value?" Journal of Financial Economics, 46, s:199-221. CHEN Chung- Jen, 2003, "The Effects of Environment and Partner Characteristics on The Choice of Alliance Forms", International Journal O f Project Management, 21, s:115-124.
  5. CHEN Homin, Tain-Jy Chen, 2003, "Governance Structures in Strategic Alliances: Transaction Cost Versus Resource- Based Perspective", Journal of World Business, 38, s:1-14.
  6. CHILD John, David Faulkner, 1998, Strategies of Co-operation: Managing Alliances, Networks and Joint Ventures, Oxford University Press,
  7. Oxford. CUI C. Chi, Derrick F. Ball, John Coyne, 2002, "Working Effectively in Strategic Alliances Through Managerial Fit Between Partners: Some Evidence From Sino-British Joint Ventures and The Implications for R&D Professionals", R&D Management, 32,4, s:343-357.
  8. DAS T.K., Bing-Shen Teng, 2001 (a), "A Risk Perception Model of Alliance Structuring", Journal Of International Management, 7, s:1-29.
  9. DAS T.K., Bing-Shen Teng, 200 l(b), "Relational Risk and Its Personal Correlates in Strategic Alliances", Journal Of Business And Psychology, Vol. 15, No.3, s:449-465.
  10. DAS T.K., Bing-Shen Teng, 2000, "A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances", Journal OfManagement, Vol: 26, No: 1, s:31-36.
  11. DOUMA Marc U., Jan Bilderbeek, Peter J. Idenburg, Jan Kees Looise, 2000, "Strategic Alliances, Managing the Dynamics of Fit", Long Range Planning, 33,579- 598. DRAULANS Johan, ve dig. 2003, "Building Alliance Capability: Management Techniques For Superior Alliance Performance", Long Range Planning, 36, s:151-166.
  12. ELMUTI Dean, Yunus Kathawala, 2001, "An Overview of Strategic Alliance", Management Decision, 39/3, s:205-217.
  13. GEBREKIDAN D. Abraha, G. Baffour Awuah, 2002, "Inter-organizational Cooperation: A New View of Strategic Alliances", Industrial Marketing Management, Vol, I. 8, s:679-693.
  14. GLAISTER Keith W., Peter J. Buckley, 1998a, "Measures o f Performance in UK International Alliances", Organization Studies, Vol.19,I:1, s:89-118.
  15. GLAISTER Keith W., Peter J. Buckley, 1998b, "Management Performance Re