Journals / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

How much are Academics at Faculties of Education Ready for Multicultural Education

Pages
966–987
Publication Date
2019-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study demonstrated that the variables of gender, age, ethnic origin, and mother language variables cause significant differences in perceptions of the academics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The purpose of this study is to identify perceptions of academics who work in education faculties on Critical Multicultural Education –Teacher Competences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group of the descriptive study consisted of academics who work in education faculties of 93 universities in the academic year of 2016-2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study demonstrated that the variables of gender, age, ethnic origin, and mother language variables cause significant differences in perceptions of the academics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Teacher training · multicultural education · Social justice

Özet

Öz The purpose of this study is to identify perceptions of academics who work in education faculties on Critical Multicultural Education –Teacher Competences. The study group of the descriptive study consisted of academics who work in education faculties of 93 universities in the academic year of 2016-2017. The research study included 328 academics. The research data were collected through the “Critical Multicultural Education Teacher Competences Scale” (CMETCS). The Critical Multicultural Education Teacher Competences Scale consists of 4 sub-dimensions as awareness, knowledge, skill and attitude. The scale had a .85 reliability coefficient. The scale development study was carried out in the province of İstanbul with 421 teachers who worked at different levels and branches. The reliability analysis which was performed to determine the appropriateness of the scale for this study demonstrated that reliability coefficients of the sub-dimensions ranged between (α) 0,724 and 0,896, and the reliability coefficient for the scale was 0,815 in general. The findings of the study revealed that the academics perceive themselves as competent in terms of the general scale, and partially competent in terms of knowledge and awareness dimensions. The study demonstrated that the variables of gender, age, ethnic origin, and mother language variables cause significant differences in perceptions of the academics.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTÇİ, Y. A. (2019). How much are Academics at Faculties of Education Ready for Multicultural Education. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 966–987. https://ajindex.com/articles/55326

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Banks, J.A. (1993). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education 19 (p. 3–49).
  2. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Banks, J.A., Suárez-Orozco, M.M., & Ben-Peretz, M. (Eds) (2016).
  3. Global Migration, Diversity, and Civic Education: Improving Policy and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  4. Başbay, A., ve Kağnıcı, Y. (2011). Çokkültürlü Yeterlik Algıları Ölçeği: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması * Eğitim ve Bilim 2011, Cilt 36, Sayı 161 Perceptions of Multicultural Competence Scale: A Scale Development Study Education and Science, 36(161). Demir, S., (2012). Demir S., "Çok Kültürlü Eğitimin Erciyes Üniversitesi Öğretim Elemanları İçin Önem Derecesi", Turkish Studies, vol.7, pp.1453-1475.
  5. Erdem, M. D., Kaya I. ve Yilmaz, A. (2017). Örgün Eğitim Kapsamındaki Suriyeli Çocukların Eğitimleri Ve Okul Yaşantıları Hakkında Öğretmen Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, Volume 5 Issue 3, p. 463-476. Doi: 10.18298/ijlet.2071.
  6. Freire, P. (1970).
  7. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum Intl. Giroux, H.A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Westport: Bergin & Garvey Publishers Inc. GİGM, İçişleri Bakanlığı Göç İdaresi Başkanlığı,(2015). Göç Tarihi. http://www.goc.gov.tr/icerik/goc-tarihi_363_380
  8. Günay, R., Aydın, H., Koç Damgacı, F. (2015). Eğitim Fakültelerinde Görev Yapan Akademisyenlerin Çokkültürlü Eğitim Kavramına İlişkin Metaforik Algıları Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences Cankiri Karatekin University / Cankiri Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi. 2015, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p291-312. 22p. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. NY: Routledge., İnal, K. (2009).
  9. Kültür, Kimlik Ve Dil, Pedagojide ötekinin dilsel hakları. Gazi Üniversitesi, İletişim Fakültesi Istanbul Bilgi University Child Studies Unit Report (2015, 2-13 September). Suriyeli mülteci çocukların Türkiye devlet okullarındaki durumu: Politika ve uygulama önerileri. Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri (2. baskı). Ankara:
  10. Asil. Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel Arastırma Yöntemi, 15. Basım Nobel Yayın Dagıtım, Ankara.
  11. Kardeş, S., & Akman, B. (2018). Suriyeli sığınmacıların eğitimine yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. İlköğretim Online, 17(3), 1224-1237.
  12. Koç-Damgacı, F. ve Aydın, H. (2013). Türkiye’dek